It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats a pretty stupid policy for a site that is supposed to offer a place to discuss almost any topic.
BTW, legalizing marijuana and hemp and taxing it seems like a good way to bring in some revenue for the whole country. These plants could save us all. Too bad we cant talk about it.
How does a person go about removing his or her self from this sites' membership? Morons...
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
my .02 on nominations...
First it *has* to be someone who would be reading drug related threads to begin with. Someone with an interest, but someone who is also impartial.
I believe that SD and BH are great members of this site and quite possibly are the most likely to be impartial on this site. Even in heated discussions...
However, as someone who is on a LOT of drug related threads, trying to minimize T&C violations, I have to say that I don't see BH and SD on these threads very often.... it could be that they are not as interested in the subject as I am, or maybe I'm just not paying attention and they really are more involved in that topic. Now I do have to say that they are both very interested in making this a good community for all.
I firmly believe that whoever is nominated MUST have an interest in the subject of Drug Related topics, no matter how tangential to "use" that thread might be, so that it is aligned with their personality and they are inclined to read it.
Originally posted by NW111
I will not talk about drugs.
but you want to hear? ok... lets discuse:
I HATE DRUGS.
DRUGS DESTROY MANY FAMILYS
THEY DESTROY LIFES!
DRUGS ARE B****S****
OPEN THE CHAT HM?
Originally posted by americandingbat
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
what if we left nominations open for a while longer, then did a thread with why we wanted to participate, then the nominees vote from among themselves.
Just a brainstorm.