It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exopolitico
We keep hearing of dogfights "up there". This may not be as far fetched as it sounds.
Originally posted by Nichiren
reply to post by RFBurns
What surface are you talking about? Is this re video 1 on page 1?
[edit on 23-2-2009 by Nichiren]
Originally posted by RFBurns
Originally posted by Nichiren
reply to post by RFBurns
What surface are you talking about? Is this re video 1 on page 1?
[edit on 23-2-2009 by Nichiren]
Yes the OP video on page 1.
2nd line.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by RFBurns
I am sure the well known debunker regulars are pouring over their notebooks right now to try to come up with a link to lens anomaly or ice particle or debris or some other rediculous explanation, and surround that with big words and indimidating, fancy theories to explain this one.
I say good luck to them.
This cannot be debris from the shuttle. The object is too far away when it enters the frame.
This cannot be a lens anomaly. No lens anomaly brings something into the frame and manuvers as this object does.
This cannot be an ice particle. It would have burned up as it moved closer to the atmosphere and became nothing, plus ice does not do 180 degree turns and move off in another direction with no other outside force nearby to make it move.
This cannot be space junk. Again, it would have begun to burn up as it got closer to the atmosphere. Free falling..or floating in this case, debris or ice does not slow down as it approaches the atmosphere. It will speed up and increase velocity, and then begin to burn up.
Im not sure what to make of it..other than it is not any of the above. It could be either a controlled craft or one of them "space critters". Either way, IMO..it is definately something other than ice, debris, lens anomaly, junk, light refraction, video glitch or whatever else is in the debunker bag o scuses.
I cant wait to hear this one explained away.
Cheers!!!!
Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to post by Phage
If that were the case we would see the lights change orientation on the surface that are shining.
Cmon, the shuttle would have to do a center pivot rotational change for it to be that, yet we do not see the ground lights change orientation.
Originally posted by RFBurns
reply to post by Phage
If that were the case we would see the lights change orientation on the surface that are shining.
[edit on 23-2-2009 by RFBurns]
Originally posted by Nichiren
Are you saying that one of the bright lights is on the surface of planet earth? A city? Sorry for being confused about this.