It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. Can the U.S. invade China in the first place?
2. Are America's technological and firepower advantages helpful in the long run against 1 billion people?
3. How effective would U.S. airpower be?
4. Is it safe to say every Chinese citizen would fight?
5. Can the U.S. hold up against a modern military supported by guerrilla warfare?
6. Any other thoughts?
no problem, we all have our weak points and strong points.
Originally posted by KyleChemist
You kind of missed my point (I'm a Ph.d chemist, so you are right my history is more than a little rusty)
Originally posted by KyleChemistthe top 25% (just a guess, but that number is probably high) of China is a growing power or even a world power, but the rest is is just trying to get by. While China's influence is certainly growing, I don't think they will be a superpower (again I may be wrong).
Originally posted by KyleChemistIt all goes back to the crab analgy, if only the top are growing in influence, sooner or later, the bottom will drag them back down. India and Brazil are in the same situation. Granted we have a situation like that in the US, but not to the extreme as it is in other countries.
Originally posted by KyleChemistI'm basing this on personal accounts from co-workers of mine from China. Again, they are some of the most hard working industrous people I know. But until China can better feed itself, I think it will reach its limits soon.
Originally posted by KyleChemistThere is an excellent frontline documentary called the "The Two Chinas" about the changes going on in China. One out of eight people in the world is a Chinese farmer.
[edit on 3-3-2005 by KyleChemist]
no problem, we all have our weak points and strong points.
China actually has the second largest GNP (purchasing power parity) en.wikipedia.org... and 6th largest over all en.wikipedia.org...
So, it's actually an economic Superpower but unlike America it's reforming its Nation instead of f'n up the Middle East. (My view.)
.
As for Brazil, India, etc, once they sort out their internal conflicts they'll be a SuperPower, where they're already invited to G8 meetings - soon they'll also be members, as they're almost out of debt
As for them being able to feed themselves, they actually could but they export far to much at the moment - give it 5 years or so and that problem will be sorted out after all, they have the land and farmers to feed most of the world.
My main point is, China is a Superpower but 'not' to the scale of America or the E.U. yet. Give it time to reform its Country and push in a lot of reforms, for example; they'll soon be able to own their own property instead of it al being government owned, but until these laws are in place they won't be a leading superpower - so 10/20 years minimum. But it all depends on their relationship with
But soon, this will all change and I personally see china coming fourth as a large power to the point one day (Our life time.) it'll be China, America, Russia, E.U. Japan, India and Brazil - in no order of power.
The Two Chinas was also an economic book, would it be the same one?
.
In reference to post 1226146 (Amur Tiger) take a look at page 48 and read over my post, if you don't mind and pass comment on that. You seem to befairly level headed on the posts
Originally posted by Odium
It would end up like the 'Forgotton War' (Korea), PVA: 390,000 casualties with the U.N. Suffering: 1,093,839, in which 397,543 were Americans, 667293 were ROKs, and 29,003 were others.
They'd not be foolish enough to try another land invasion, remember during this war China had, No NAVY, AIR FORCE, ARTILLARY, TANKS, etc. It had a limited amount of guns and ammunition (only what they could steal or Japan had left after WW2.) and yet still beat the U.N's Forces back.
Originally posted by Megaquad
Originally posted by Odium
It would end up like the 'Forgotton War' (Korea), PVA: 390,000 casualties with the U.N. Suffering: 1,093,839, in which 397,543 were Americans, 667293 were ROKs, and 29,003 were others.
They'd not be foolish enough to try another land invasion, remember during this war China had, No NAVY, AIR FORCE, ARTILLARY, TANKS, etc. It had a limited amount of guns and ammunition (only what they could steal or Japan had left after WW2.) and yet still beat the U.N's Forces back.
Where did you get those numbers? en.wikipedia.org... says that 54,000 were US casualties and 1,5 million Korean and Chinese.
Even this (probably unreliable) site www.centurychina.com... says that China suffered twice casualties as USA.
Originally posted by Odium
My history teacher, actually verified the: www.centurychina.com... as being fairly accurate and the Korean War and Vietnam/Asian Conflicts after 1940 are her main area of teaching. (I went over the statistics with her Friday Morning, as I had a class with her before I used them on this site.)
Also my statistics take into account the fighting that happened during the Peace Process, as a Cease Fire was never signed. A lot of historians stop the record at July the 1st 1951, when in fact it lasted years longer. ( July 1953 and even then a few smaller attacks occured.)