It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dallas
China v US: Your right its a no win scenario. Perhaps the answer lies between the orders of Pakistan, India and China, three nuclear countries possibly being told about universal regulations by others not from here?
Dallas
Originally posted by blackSt33L
And by the way give China afew more decades and allow her rapid growth to continue and we`ll have a new police nation amongst us besides the US.
Note that China is indeed already a superpower.
Originally posted by Broadsword20068
Where do you people come up with this crazy stuff? The Chinese DO NOT have more experience, that is my whole point. They've been invaded, yes, but they have no experience with modern aerial warfare or modern naval warfare.
And yes they are behind technologically a good deal, though the gap is closing.
And no, the U.S. owuld not be invaded. An invasion requires a fleet coming across the ocean. China does not have a blue-water navy. They'd need aircraft carriers, which they don't have, and when they do eventually get any, they have no experience operating them in battle.
If they tried to send a fleet across the ocean, it would get bombed back to the stoneage by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy.
And no, the Chinese do not make up with wisdom at all. That is why they were invaded by the West in the first place, because they were so narrow-minded, that they refused to upgrade their military.
Originally posted by Broadsword20068
Democrats believe me are just as narrow-minded as Republicans in many, many areas.
And to think the U.S. could be invaded is crazy right now, as it is impossible. What you seem to miss the point on is EXPERIENCE. You have to know HOW to operate a carrier in a war situation, HOW to operate submarine in a war situation.
First China must acquire these items for a blue-water navy. They then must learn how to use them. What China at the moment more wants to do is create a navy with enough threatening force to deter the U.S. Navy, so that if in the event the U.S. and China go to conflict over Taiwan, the Chinese would give the U.S. Navy a real challenge theoretically; technically, the U.S. Navy would most likely beat them due to superior training and tactics, and a lot more experience (50+ years naval experience, China 0 years essentially).
So the idea would be to hope that the U.S. public would fear losing their loved ones and thus say, even though the U.S. would win, that it would cost too many lives and thus to he** with it.
7.If you factor in chinese terrorists(funny idea haha) and a racially divided America(china only has 1 main people, 50% of America is minorities), America will lose.
Originally posted by thejackal
why would the us and china have a war theres no oil in aids ridden china
Originally posted by tomcat ha
US is better now but in 20 years from now that situation could be very different. China is advancing faster than the US but for now they are still behind in aircrat naval tech. Infantry and tanks are i think on par.