Surprise!!! Obama's Team Clears Obama...(?), page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 18 times


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 08:31 AM by heather65
reply to post by antar



you must have skimmed the article because it stated that a generator was being sent to the obama house.
for security reasons, i see the urgency in having the generator.
now unless obama had access to a teleportation device to bring the generator to his home within a second after the outage, then i'd co-sign on your indignation. because i'd want a teleporter for my home.
alas, he didn't.
you seem to have twisted the article's words to suit your tastes.


[edit on 27-12-2008 by heather65]


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 08:33 AM by emsed1
reply to post by pluckynoonez



HAHAHHA!!! The ship's been towed beyond the environment... perfect!


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 08:44 AM by heather65
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic




i think it may be in their manual titled "How To Deflect Criticism".
to put it kindly, i find it amusing.


[edit on 27-12-2008 by heather65]



reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 08:57 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Fact is - when people who used to be smart and used to be able to see through a typical politician suddenly start giving him a free pass on everything - even when his actions are those of a typical politician - then something serious has happened to that persons thought process. They have become disciples or sheeple or blind followers ... take your pick. It all fits.




I don't give him a free pass on ANYTHING.

When Obama sent out a letter asking for money to pay off Hillary’s debt:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I also sent him a letter disapproving of his Wall St. bailout position.

When he voted for FISA:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

On gun control:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I have disagreed with him and strongly disapproved of him and have said so here and TO HIM, but that fact doesn't mean anything when people want to play the "disciple" card.

I can PROVE that I have not blindly followed him, but it means nothing to those would would attack me for my support of him.

Truth is, I can't even post in a thread about Obama without the same people coming out of nowhere to criticize ME for "defending" him and call me a hypocrite, when all I did was ask clarification questions. Fortunately, I know it's because people want to shut me up, which gives me more power. I will not shut up.

So, even though this type of internal investigation is done ALL THE TIME, when Obama does it, it's some kind of ironic joke... Who's making blind judgments here?


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:12 AM by jd140
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Originally posted by LiquidMirage
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to
post by jd140



Ohh look, a liberal playing the race card AGAIN!

Imagine that!

I thought this discussion was about o-boy being cleared of any wrong doing by his own people.

I think it is about time you people rub your skulls together and come up with some new material. The civilized world is sick of your 50 year old routine!


No evidence...investigation concludes no connection! No evidence...now what are we left with?? He's guilty anyway right?

He was cleared of wrongdoing by Federal Authorties and cursed vehemently by Blago himself for only offering thanks instead of Chicago style pay for play!

So Mr. Conservative if there is not a shread of evidence is he guilty then?? Why is guilty?? Because ??????????????


He isn't guilty..............Wait a minute I'm supposed to be a racist so I can't possibly think this now can I?

Answer this question if you can.

Why do you accuse all that oppose Obama a racist? Did you take one look at him and say "I'm going to vote for him because he is black"?

Obamas team did an investigation and found him innocent. That in itself is comical because it is his team. Forget for a moment that others found him innocent. His team isn't going to say "we did an investigation on our boss and we have concluded that he is guilty". That would be career suicide.

Once again, I do not think he is guilty. Yes, you heard right, a racist believes Obama won the election out right and is free of any guilt that he is involved with that moron.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:23 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by FlyersFan
THE POINT IS - it is dirty politics as usual when everyone else does it. When Obama does it, it is not only dirty politics as usual but ALSO an ironic joke because his entire campaign theme was 'change' ... and obviously this isn't change. It is nothing more than politics as usual.


I understand your opinion. I just disagree with it.

What I DON'T understand is why we cannot disagree without you and others calling names like hypocrite, disciple, sheeple and so on. That DETRACTS and DEFLECTS from the issue we are supposed to be discussing.

On topic:

I don't see "dirty politics" just because someone conducts an internal investigation. That, IN ITSELF, is not indicative of dirty politics or anything else. That's your assumption.

Churches, businesses, charity organizations, all conduct internal investigations. Maybe because there's been a complaint, or because someone got hurt, or they became involved in a lawsuit or someone broke the law. Internal Investigation DOES NOT equal "dirty politics". An internal investigation cannot absolve someone of guilt. That's ridiculous.

Obama and his team are associated with Blagojevich. That doesn't mean they are guilty of anything, just that there's an association via Obama's Senate seat. So, naturally, they are being investigated by the FBI and the federal prosecutor to ascertain their level of association and involvement (if any) in Blago's scandal.

In addition, Obama has conducted an Internal Investigation to ascertain that level of association and involvement to report his finding to the people, because he has promised transparency. That's the change. NOT to absolve himself! He cannot do that. But to tell us what he found.

I don't expect you to see change because you are so set against the man, or to agree with me on my opinion, but to resort to name calling because we disagree is nothing but deflection.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:35 AM by jd140
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic




Hmm you can't agree with Obama without being called sheeple or disciple? You feel a little mistreated? Look how Bush opposers treated his supporters for the past 8 years. Now that Obama is the next President you want everyone to calm down and have intelligent conversations without the name calling?

I have been told that I should feel ashamed for voting for Bush.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for agreeing with the war.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for not thinking Bush is a war mongor.

Shoes on the other foot and you don't like it. Get used to it, you reap what you sow.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:52 AM by pteridine
reply to post by jd140



You said: "Now that Obama is the next President you want everyone to calm down and have intelligent conversations without the name calling?"

Yes. I thought that the idea of ATS was to have intelligent conversation without name calling.
You should note that Obama is not yet the next president and President Bush will remain in power for another 3+ weeks.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:54 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by jd140
Now that Obama is the next President you want everyone to calm down and have intelligent conversations without the name calling?


Well, I've always wanted intelligent discussion. And frankly, I don't care if you call Obama names. I may debate with you about it, but I have nothing against you criticizing Obama. It's healthy. He's government. I'm talking about calling OTHER MEMBERS names. I'm AGAINST that.

I'm sure Semper will find some posts of mine where I criticized Bush, because I did my part and MORE, but only after he did something in office that I disagreed with. In fact, hopefully Semper will find some of my posts where I talked about supporting the war AND Bush before I found out about the lies he told us to take us to war. Because I flew my flag every day and teared up at Bush's patriotic speeches and argued with my family because they were all against the war and Bush.

So, you're barking up the wrong tree.


I have been told that I should feel ashamed for voting for Bush.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for agreeing with the war.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for not thinking Bush is a war mongor.


Not by me.

And I'll take it. I AM taking it. I CAN TAKE IT! I could leave these threads and not post again and ignore them, but I come back in the hopes of decent discussion. I have stuff to say! AND when people call me and other members names, I will speak out against it, just as I have spoken out against calling Obama critics "racist". Feel free to carry on. And so will I.

[edit on 27-12-2008 by Benevolent Heretic]


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 11:00 AM by jd140
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by jd140
Now that Obama is the next President you want everyone to calm down and have intelligent conversations without the name calling?


Well, I've always wanted intelligent discussion. And frankly, I don't care if you call Obama names. I may debate with you about it, but I have nothing against you criticizing Obama. It's healthy. He's government. I'm talking about calling OTHER MEMBERS names. I'm AGAINST that.

I'm sure Semper will find some posts of mine where I criticized Bush, because I did my part and MORE, but only after he did something in office that I disagreed with. In fact, hopefully Semper will find some of my posts where I talked about supporting the war AND Bush before I found out about the lies he told us to take us to war. Because I flew my flag every day and teared up at Bush's patriotic speeches and argued with my family because they were all against the war and Bush.

So, you're barking up the wrong tree.


I have been told that I should feel ashamed for voting for Bush.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for agreeing with the war.
I have been told that I was a mindless sheeple for not thinking Bush is a war mongor.


Not by me.

And I'll take it. I AM taking it. I CAN TAKE IT! I could leave these threads and not post again and ignore them, but I come back in the hopes of decent discussion. I have stuff to say! AND when people call me and other members names, I will speak out against it. Feel free to carry on. And so will I.


Shoe is on the other foot, Obama supporters have a long 4 years. I wonder how blindly they will follow him and support him. Watch the hypocrites will start flooding this board. Not saying you. Just watch though, it is already starting. If you are against Obama it is because you are racist.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 12 days ago with 79 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 13 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 4 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 9 days ago with 18 member flags
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Posted 2 days ago with 16 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 13 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 7 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags