Originally posted by Jim Scott
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by Jim Scott
Perverted behavior? Can you please define that?
Is the act of love a perverted behavior?
Def. of perverse: willfully determined not to do what is expected or desired; contrary. Turned away from what is right, good, or proper; wicked.
This thread is not judging the perverse acts, it is suggesting the equal reverse of boycotting and demonstrating against gays as they are doing to
non-gays.
If this is the case, why do
you keep bringing up and quoting the Christian propaganda used for the last few decades as your defense?
And I think we have all agreed that people can act as they wish as long as it harms none (oh how I wish that were true across this entire discussion,
then we wouldn't need to be having it).
Straights can boycott gay businesses, and I'm sure some are. Gay people can boycott businesses that support the denial of their rights as American
citizens, and I am sure they are.
As for who will be hurt the most?
It's hard to tell, but one thing I do know, gay people are great at showing support for their friends.
I was there when the Admiral Duncan Pub in London was reopened after a Nazi sicko bombed it, it took two hours to get through the crowd to the bar.
What was supposed to be nothing more than a reopening turned into a street party with thousands there.
Gay people will support businesses who respect their rights, and they combine in great numbers to boost their own economy when it's needed.
Hence, other businesses will loose out as gay people will only trust gay operated/owned businesses.
Rightly so, I would do exactly the same thing.
The state started this by opening up equality rights to a public vote based on religious belief.
It is only fair that those businesses suffer the consequences of their actions, and the state leadership in turn faces the ridicule of the nation.
As for straight people boycotting gay businesses, no harm done there I'm afraid. They'll happily support themselves where needed.