reply to post by budski
I guess this stems from the fact that certain policies which were changed in the West were percieved as a correction of past injustices.
Would you defend slavery if Arabs owned black people in modern times; simply by dismissing it against the West previously owning slaves?
What we in the West percieve as past wrongs are also extrapolated to other countries; and if they still indulge in them then we judge them. Thats
pretty much just the nature of the West.
Child marriage is much the same. I dont think that its malice can simply be dismissed as being another culture and therefore immune from criticism.
Neither can it be dismissed just because it occured at some point in the past in the West.
How about women being barred from driving? Or stoned to death after being raped? Or honour killing? Are these beyond reproach simply because they
occur in another land, under someone else's watch?
Arabia is advanced in some spheres as you rightly say- education, law and order are well maintained in their countries. They are a hospitable,
intelligent people by and large; but some things are still dubious. I have no doubt that Saudi Arabia would be significantly more advanced if they
rejected the Wahhabi sect of Islamic doctrine, and became more moderate.
I look at Arabia and by my moral compass (which is by no means totally in line with the traditional Western morals), and I see a land which is
backward in some respects. Arabia is extremely pragmatic in some respects, but extremely backwards in others. This is my opinion- Im not going to go
over there and force them to comply with what I think.
Nonetheless I will not respect Arabia as a region unless some things change... If you call me prejudiced for that, so be it.