It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nj2day
reply to post by FSBlueApocalypse
Star and flagged mate I'm thinking along the lines as you are as well.
I got your back in here when the flames start flying
Originally posted by Demandred
*digs a trench and dons helmet*
*grins @ nj2day across no mans land*
im ready
Originally posted by nj2day
I do want to throw out there that Evolution does not need to explain how life began...
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
That is what it has tried to do, though. Quite unsuccessfully I might add.
It is still nothing more than it was when Darwin proposed it, a theory.
It really matters little to me whether it's true or not. It's not going to change what I believe.
As I stated, evolution does not disprove an intelligent design at all... I have always viewed evolution as the mechanism God (Guiding-Organizing Design process) used to create life.
Originally posted by nj2day
Well, if some piece of evidence came along to completely explain beyond a shadow of a doubt, that science can indeed explain the universe from the big bang,
Originally posted by nj2day
Do you believe it atoms? Atomic Theory is still "just a Theory"...
[I have always viewed evolution as the mechanism God (Guiding-Organizing Design process) used to create life.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
There has to be a primal cause of this "bang."
Also, without there being a prime consciousness, nothing exists...
So, really, anything that you throw at me doesn't change my beliefs. I have incorporated so many things into what I believe, I am not very dogmatic, that it would be hard to dissuade me from anything I already believe.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
When you can, then, and only then, will I accept evolution with any degree of certainty. Until then, Evolutionary theory is just that, THEORY.
Thank ya, thank ya very much.
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by scientist
no im not debating a post i used the post as an example of the mindset of evolutionists, you claim science and reason yet science hasnt answered the 2 big question i put forth ... yada yada yada
A theory is a little different than what you are implying here. A theory is a testable observation that not only satisfies all known factual data sets, but also is able to predict future behavior... Do you believe it atoms? Atomic Theory is still "just a Theory"...
Thats a pretty lazy deity IMO... "bammo, here's bacteria... now go forth and create man... its ok... I'll wait a billion years or so... "
here is your flaw in reasoning though, apparently you feel that your theory needs to be "disproven". However, for ID to be entered into the realm of scientific study, you have to provide something we can test using the scientific method. To date, this has not happened...
on atomic theory
There is still debate as to the validity of even that...
on Evolutionary Theory
Until evolutionists can find the missing link between flowering and non flowering plants and that all improtant "golden fleece" of the link between apes and homo sapiens, it will always be questioned. Why most evolutionists just can't accept that is beyond me.
On Intelligent Design[I have always viewed evolution as the mechanism God (Guiding-Organizing Design process) used to create life.
hefty requirements indeed. I will ask you to concede that religion is also just a theory under the same premise.
but again we are debating two different things. To me, science is the process of asking questions, and testing out various doubts, over and over. Religion is the exact opposite, in fact religion is based on just accepting some things, and being willfully ignorant of doubts - literally, ignoring the doubt replaced by faith.
Originally posted by scientist
I will ask you to concede that religion is also just a theory under the same premise.
Originally posted by nj2day
Then why do we need a middle man for this to happen? If life evolved this far, why do we need some all seeing magic man in the sky to accredit it to?
Originally posted by nj2day
do evolution detractors really expect us to find fossils of every generation of every species to prove this correct?
Originally posted by Demandred
ill have to disagree on this point if a theory satisfies all known factual data sets it wouldnt be called a theory it would be called a fact, and the fact is Darwin was well aware of the shortcommings of his theory which is why he constantly tried revising it.
take newtons laws these were taken as absolute fact where as was discovered newtons laws only really apply to earth hence why astrophysics was created, because it was easier to create a new branch than it was to demote Newtons laws back to newtons theories
newtons laws are also a good example of how scientists can make errors because they dont have all known variables as with evolution
considering we dont know how to create life maybe thats just the way it has to be done to create stable multi cellular life forms.
seriously mate, can you really look at this planet and the universe as a whole and marvel about just how perfect everything seems to fit together? just how uniform all these obects are and still seriously believe that its all just random happenstance?
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
You see, to me, you sound almost frightened of such a concept. Why?