It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FSBlueApocalypse
reply to post by Demandred
While we haven't gotten a full blown artifical cell yet, we're quite close. Scientists have created artificial DNA and artificial lipid layer already.
Originally posted by Demandred
reply to post by FSBlueApocalypse
if evolutionists dont believe that evolution explains the origins of life then why are they always trying to use it as a cudgel against creationists which does try to explain the origins of life?
Originally posted by scientist
I don't think anyone is overly hostile to Creationists either (codeword for christians most of the time).
Darwin stated doubts concerning evolution. Some were subject to his open expression. He saw the potential—from what he could mentally wrestle and grasp—for unresolveable problems. We should expect no less from an intellect that seeks to coalesce the big picture into a seamless vision.
Conversely, so much seemed to fit the theory and nature seemed to exhibit an order that evolution theory could piece together. After all, natural selection and examples from animal breeding along with the idea of descent from some one or few common ancestral forms was logical, but not entirely reasoned to a final conclusion. Still, there were wrinkles, gaps, and issues left unexplained. And that probably bugged Darwin so much so that he edited his Origin of Species from one edition to the next. Doubts and unresolved issues remained—and with good reason—because evolution was theory and not an established fact. Even today, proof is elusive and perhaps ultimately unobtainable. So, Darwin was right to express doubts and was right to keep on problem solving as best he could.