It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
reply to post by Annee
Who are we to determine - the qualities of the homosexual makeup - were not by design?
Problem is you have to prove that there is a design and a god. From the perspective of nature, there is no design being as how variation and therefore all evolution is driven by 'mistakes' or mutations. In point of fact, every single last gene in your body is a mutation of an older version, ever single one. Reproduction is pretty fickle, so many things can go awry and it seems non-heterosexuality is one of them.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
To God, fornication is equal to homosexuality as a sin.
But most people don't accept that, either way. The bible is what, what it is. You can disagree with it all you want. God expects most to disagree with it anyway, no big surprise here.
But I do agree there is a double standard as to how churches and most people of faith look at sin.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10 (New International Version)
"9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."
According 1 Corinthians 6:9 & 10 a drunkard is just as bad as homosexual, or a thief or a fornicator. Is the bible being prejudice against fornicators too?
The standard is what the majority of society accepts, that's not the bible standard anyway.
Fornication=Sin.
Homosexuality=Sin.
Fornication=Homosexuality.
Thus most human perception of major sin is different from the reality as God see's it, and he see's it, as it is written in the book of Corinthians.
please try to rise above medevil thinking.. the word didnt even exsist then.. this is another attempt by a dogmatic church to vilifie another group.. but then again they have a long history of that, dont they
Originally posted by scorand
my point is that the claim of homosexuality being a sin is bogus..
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by Annee
Gays can reproduce by having heterosexual sex. I've yet to see homosexual sex result in a pregnancy.
Scientists suspect a genetic factor partly responsible for turning men gay also boosts fertility when inherited by women.
For that reason it has been preserved by nature, it is claimed. Normally such a trait, which acts to prevent offspring being born, would be weeded out through natural selection.
The Italian researchers say the theory ties in with other work pointing to a genetic link to homosexuality carried on the female X chromosome.
Homosexuality in males may be caused in part by genes that can increase fertility in females, according to a new study.
The findings may help solve the puzzle of why, if homosexuality is hereditary, it hasn't already disappeared from the gene pool, since gay people are less likely to reproduce than heterosexuals.
A team of researchers found that some female relatives of gay men tend to have more children than average.