posted on Nov, 13 2008 @ 12:22 PM
reply to post by Irish M1ck
First, I have not posted anything linking to either of those sites so direct your anger elsewhere.
Second, I was not justifying your actions. If they need justified, you can do it yourself.
Third, I was not providing back up for you. I was merely directing attention to the fact that others in this thread have already questioned the
validity of anything posted on that site and that you are not the only one to notice the fact that they are the only source for the information.
And quite frankly, if you feel the need to be rude find someone else to be rude to. I was nothing but polite in my last post to you and I would expect
someone who claims to know so much more than everyone else to at least be civil when speaking to others. You don't have to like me or my opinions,
and frankly I don't care if you do or not. But your attitude is uncalled for, find someone else to put up with it.
reply to post by HunkaHunka
I have no problems admitting when things are hogwash, which again this most likely is since no one can find this story anywhere that doesn't use API
as the source. Even if they were the first to have the story, but now other news sites would have verified the information through somewhere besides
API. That they haven't leaves this article looking extremely suspicious.
And yes there are those who believe it and those who don't, but I would say that there is also a third group who thinks that while it is
hypothetically possible that the article is at least based on fact it is highly unlikely to be true if every single news site that has the story
running is using API when they are suspicious even without this particular article.