It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
Considering the worst case scenario, could this be a NWO conspiracy, or just a political one, to secure general power over the people just to make them vote for certain parties. I don't know what to think about who might be behind this movement if there is someone.
Originally posted by deepred
Creation and evolution are only seperated in a time line, first it is created then it evolves.
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by Horza
so people that believe that creationism is not anti-intellectual shouldn't say so?
strange point of view, why should skeptics be excluded from this discussion in particular?
[edit on 30/10/08 by pieman]
Originally posted by BluegrassRevolutionary
reply to post by Good Wolf
I could not agree more.
And people wonder why the US is falling way behind in the areas of math and science. We as a society should not tolerate such non-sense. Creationism is a BELIEF, evolution is a SCIENCE...there is a big difference.
Originally posted by HooHaa
Evolutionists claim that before the big bang there was nothing
reply to post by HooHaa
i'm sure evolutionary scientists claim nothing about the big bang, or if they do, it's not a professional opinion, only personal. i'm also sure that physicists either say they don't know or they think there was something, or they think there was nothing because.....they can't say there was nothing, full stop, because they haven't a shred of evidence for it.
[edit on 30/10/08 by pieman]
Originally posted by HooHaa
I know change takes place over time but evolution doesnt explain origins.
Originally posted by pieman
excuse me, i misunderstood, deepest apologies.
Originally posted by donhuangenaro
scientists BELIEVE in so many things without proof, like big bang, dark matter, red shift, black holes... etc, etc
to me both sides look the same: unintelligent
both sides have so many dogmas which they hold but in the same time The Truth evades them
Originally posted by Horza
Originally posted by pieman
reply to post by Horza
so people that believe that creationism is not anti-intellectual shouldn't say so?
strange point of view, why should skeptics be excluded from this discussion in particular?
[edit on 30/10/08 by pieman]
You also misunderstand pieman
deepred was talking about creation ... as in the creation of everything ... we are not debating creation being anti-intellectual, because creation cannot even be defined in those terms.
The OP is talking about Creationism ... the movement of Creationism ... any Creationist that wants to debate that Creationism is not anti-intellectual is, in fact by the definition of this format, warmly welcomed to put forward their side of the argument.
Originally posted by Horza
A scientist may believe something because to them, the evidence that they have seen, thus far (and that is the important bit) shows them that their belief is fact.
If evidence is presented to them that proves that evidence and therefore their belief, incorrect, then the vast majority of scientists will change their minds or adjust their beliefs to fit the evidence that is considered to be fact.