It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
Alrighty people. Looks like we've all gotten past discussing theory and it only took 12 pages. No lets get back to the deal at hand, the conspiracy of spreading anti-intellectualism. Considering the worst case scenario, could this be a NWO conspiracy, or just a political one, to secure general power over the people just to make them vote for certain parties. I don't know what to think about who might be behind this movement if there is someone.
Originally posted by Good Wolf
AndI believe that guy on youtube is venomfangx. He's well nutz.
This is one of the most provocative books I have read in years. In the first few chapters Mr. Talbot describes the emerging holographic paradigm in science, drawing on David Bohm's work in quantum physics and Karl Pribam's work in neuroscience. I found both descriptions to be fascinating, and especially enjoyed the historical context for the work of these two seminal thinkers. As a person with a master's degree in neuroscience and chaos/complexity theory, I found a couple of his simplifications misleading, but would give him high marks for his overall comprehension of the conclusions of Pribam and his followers.
The remaining 2/3 of the book is a discussion of how the holographic paradigm may provide a rational basis for interpreting a wide variety of phenomenon located around the fringes of established science. He looks at everything from strange historical "miracles" like stigmata and appearances of the Virgin Mary to modern psychic abilities and '___' experiences, from out-of-body and near-death-experiences to UFO abductions. In addition, he compares language used in the modern scientific discussion of holography with the language used by ancient mystical traditions.
Mr. Talbot's writing style is unusually clear and lucid. All of this makes for a highly engaging book. It kept me up late every night for more than a week. I am a person who has had an OBE/NDE (out-of-body, near-death-experience), and can tell you that his description of such events is an astoundingly accurate portrayal of what I experienced.
I am also a scientist, and know that most of my highly rational, empirical colleages would have trouble accepting a majority of Mr. Talbot's conclusions. This work addresses something so completely out of the realm of everyday experience for most people, and probes a world that is normally invisible to the five senses. Hence, objective, empirical science -- as defined by a conventional theorist or practicing technician -- simply cannot address these experiences. They are outside the range of focus of the tool that Western minds currently rely on. I believe there is an extraordinary synthesis happening among the realms of human experience, one that can validate each individual's story, however unusual, and also one that honors all the different ways of knowing. I see Mr. Talbot's work as one of the more important bridges yet constructed between traditional science and spirituality, between rational discourse about repeatable, empirically verifiable phenomenon and the quirky, esoteric or mythological elements of personal experience that actually define most people's experience of reality. This book is a "must read" for any passionate seeker of truth.
Originally posted by lifeform
so you agree yourself evolution dos'nt explain how life started or that there is'nt a god.
so why are you against teaching creation in school? it would be no different to teaching the lightning striking 'soup' theory. creation dos'nt threaten evolution and visa versa, you would'nt be unteaching children about evolution is you taught creation.
they don't mix, they both try to explain different occurences.
people keep saying "but we are talking about evolution" so why was creationism even mentioned, or why was evolution offered as a better theory, when both explain different things.
creation theories are overlooked due to people like yourself not seeing past the bible explaination. if anyone mentions a creation theory you instantly assume they are religous.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Good Wolf
AndI believe that guy on youtube is venomfangx. He's well nutz.
Oh God....
Venomfangx
Yikes!
He is nuts, but he is also very Christian
Originally posted by Horza
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
Originally posted by Good Wolf
AndI believe that guy on youtube is venomfangx. He's well nutz.
Oh God....
Venomfangx
Yikes!
He is nuts, but he is also very Christian
Man ... that guys scares the crap outs me ... look into his eyes when he rants ... he really really really means and believes all that he says.
He also deletes or bans any comments on his vids that don't praise him or agree with him.
Poor form that ...
The Islamic empire held these values too, up until fundamentalists rose to power.
[Answers in Genesis] (Bold added by me)
No apparent, perceived, or claimed interpretation of evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.
Originally posted by solomons path
reply to post by Horza
Great post!
You can see it in politics, as well. Look at how the GOP has portrayed every dem candidate since Clinton . . . They always pull the "intellectual elitist" card. They consider it a smear and matter of trust that the "leftist" went to Ivy League Schools and had Rhodes scholarships, yet the Rep candidate went to Ivy League schools and yadda yadda . . . AND, the "reds" fall for it every time. Unfortunately, it furthers along this perception that being smart and accomplished, at some point, becomes a negative. The smart guy doesn't like you and can't be trusted. What's the old saying . . . "there's such a thing as being too smart"?