posted on Aug, 30 2008 @ 08:52 PM
Originally posted by mtmouse32
Some states? Do you happen to see a children's hospital of ANY sort in every state / major city? No. From what it looks, they do have hospitals in a
lot of major cities and Canada all over the US. And granted, they cater to children, what's the point? The initial statement was that the hospitals
were for the rich. Now its a bash against just children. How about picking on Jerry's kids, Miracle Network ( which has only children hospitals
throughout the US )
Its like an endless rant. Always going to be something wrong with them, even if its not wrong. There are dozens of specific hospitals for children.
There are hospitals specific for different causes. Doesn't make them or the people who run them bad.
You brought kids hospitals into this, not me, I was talking about hospitals in general that "help everyone" not a specific age bracket and even
then; kids with certain sicknesses.
You're the one ranting not me...lol
Since : 1.) I live in the US and 2) I have worked in the health care field ( and was in an ambulance that transported a terminally ill child to the
nearest children's hospital ... the house we picked him up at certainly wasn't the governors mansion - and the town wasn't upper ( or upper-middle
Granted, rich may get the better rooms, better drugs ... but I would certainly think that these children's hospitals that do fundraisers would be
sued and in the news if it was known for a fact that the rich get first dibs of help before another child with the same illness.
Did they have health insurance?
How'd they handle that huge medical bill.
My cousin had to pay 300 to 400 just for a ambulance to pick her up.
Hospitals are a momentary help and screw people afterwards...the thing is people need that momentary help...which falls in to the exploitation of
people that I said I was against.
Seems like your agreeing they do, then a defense shield goes up.
[edit on 30-8-2008 by Shawn B.]