|
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 08:58 AM by theblunttruth
|
Un-manned black budget bombers have been under development for a long time now, not only with Mach 4+ capability but also stealth tech. They
wouldn't even need UAV's as a dummy sortie, thats if the rumours are to be believed.
Check history:
1st Gulf War - F117 Nighthawk
Kosovo/2nd Gulf War - B2
Iran - ?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 09:10 AM by umbracode
|

You guys watched too many hollywood war movies.
Some of you stated there will be WW3,it's just ridiculous,the strike will be against iran's nuclear facilities where intelligence know they're
eniriching uranium for building nuclear bombs, and no russia or china will cares to much for joining a war with iran a government who based its
constitutiion on the KORAN.There will just be UN security council meeting who will be boicoted by the Us,that's it.
Let's nuke Iran asap and stop them now as we are still in time,othwewise in few years we could really face a REAL threat to world PEACE.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 09:15 AM by theblunttruth
|
Originally posted by umbracode
You guys watched too many hollywood war movies.
Some of you stated there will be WW3,it's just ridiculous,the strike will be against iran's nuclear facilities where intelligence know they're
eniriching uranium for building nuclear bombs, and no russia or china will cares to much for joining a war with iran a government who based its
constitutiion on the KORAN.There will just be UN security council meeting who will be boicoted by the Us,that's it.
Let's nuke Iran asap and stop them now as we are still in time,othwewise in few years we could really face a REAL threat to world PEACE.
Agree 100%, Ideologically Russia and China have more differences with Iran than the US do!! WW3 would not happen, just as it didnt with Iraq, just as
it didn't with Georgia.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 09:41 AM by Spock Shock
|
Holy, he better use some force or hes gonna get B-Slapped by russia at the same time...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:37 AM by jimmyjackblack
|

Originally posted by pluckynoonez
This is all good news. This all fits into Bush's plan for peace and freedom in the Middle East. You just have to imagine looking at it through the
eyes of Jesus...to agree with Bush, it is that simple.
Oh yes I forgot about that verse where Jesus told folks to kill everyone who doesn't agree with Him, oh wait THAT'S NOT TRUE!
seriously, don't try and pin this on Jesus or His teachings, He taught us to love each other and tel help each other, not kill each other, so don't
try and point the finger at religion. After all, Bush and most of the other higher ups sacrifice children to a big stone and metal owl out in the
woods of Cali, that's not very Christian is it?
I find what you said to be offensive and obviously not true at all, the only true thing in what you said is the fact that Christians are being
brainwashed by the government into thinking that killing is a good and that God wants us to kill as long as it's our country doing it.
Back to the issue though, did this come as a suprise to anyone? I mean common, we've known this is in the works for quite some time, Bush wants to go
out with a bang, boy is it going to be a big one too. Bush and every other sleezy politician disgust me.
-Jimmy
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:41 AM by Misfit
|
Originally posted by umbracode
Let's nuke Iran asap and stop them now as we are still in time,othwewise in few years we could really face a REAL threat to world PEACE.
Well thank the gods that you are only an armchair general, that the red button is nowhere within your reach.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 10:47 AM by earthman4
|
None of the right wingers have ever been able to explain to me why Iran cannot have all the nuclear devices they want. Why should they be denied what
all the other bullies have?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:00 AM by Reddupo
|
 
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:04 AM by earthman4
|
Originally posted by Reddupo
reply to post by jimmyjackblack
This is a good example of why sarcasm does not work over the internet.
I'm still not sure it was sarcasm. There are many who would throw out the Jesus is a republican line. I know for a fact that Bin Ladin was a
republican.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:05 AM by daddymax
|
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
This is all good news. This all fits into Bush's plan for peace and freedom in the Middle East. You just have to imagine looking at it through the
eyes of Jesus...to agree with Bush, it is that simple.
WOW!!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:10 AM by Tunedbeats
|
 
Originally posted by earthman4
None of the right wingers have ever been able to explain to me why Iran cannot have all the nuclear devices they want. Why should they be denied what
all the other bullies have?
Excactly. I can't understand why people think they can have nukes, but others shouldnt be allowed too. Sure sure "Because else they could
bomb us".
So you just bomb them first huh? Because they can? Not saying they will but because they have the ability too? Hypocrisy at its best, some of you
posters make me sick. You should be ashamed of yourself. Thats like killing a random dude on the street because he is able and "might" kill you on a
later note.
See the problem there?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:14 AM by earthman4
|
Originally posted by Tunedbeats
Originally posted by earthman4
None of the right wingers have ever been able to explain to me why Iran cannot have all the nuclear devices they want. Why should they be denied what
all the other bullies have?
Excactly. I can't understand why people think they can have nukes, but others shouldnt be allowed too. Sure sure "Because else they could
bomb us".
So you just bomb them first huh? Because they can? Not saying they will but because they have the ability too? Hypocrisy at its best, some of you
posters make me sick. You should be ashamed of yourself. Thats like killing a random dude on the street because he is able and "might" kill you on a
later note.
See the problem there?
I think nukes need to be taken away from the ones that used them. You can carry a gun on the street, but start shooting people and the police should
take it away.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:23 AM by Just-Think
|
I wouldn't take this article to serious. De Telegraaf is know for being a "sensational" newspaper like The Sun..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:30 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
reply to post by FreezeM
What kind of Unmanned Aircraft can carry the two ton Bunker Busters needed to do the job?
This was probably started by the Russians or the Iranians themselves.
ATS rumors usually start out something like this:
ATS Rumor
Bush
Bush
Bush
Bush
Nothing Ever Happens
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 11:53 AM by xtc18
|
Originally posted by Tunedbeats
Originally posted by earthman4
None of the right wingers have ever been able to explain to me why Iran cannot have all the nuclear devices they want. Why should they be denied what
all the other bullies have?
Excactly. I can't understand why people think they can have nukes, but others shouldnt be allowed too. Sure sure "Because else they could
bomb us".
So you just bomb them first huh? Because they can? Not saying they will but because they have the ability too? Hypocrisy at its best, some of you
posters make me sick. You should be ashamed of yourself. Thats like killing a random dude on the street because he is able and "might" kill you on a
later note.
Well the problem with Iran and nukes is that they have already threatened a nation to wipe them off the map, their also known to support terrorists
that they could just give the nukes to use on someone so Iran don't get blamed. If Iran was smart and didn't say anything about wiping Israel or
something they probably could of made it to have nukes but since they have threatened Israel that wont happen, as USA MUST protect the Jews its their
JOB
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:07 PM by earthman4
|
Originally posted by xtc18
Originally posted by Tunedbeats
Originally posted by earthman4
None of the right wingers have ever been able to explain to me why Iran cannot have all the nuclear devices they want. Why should they be denied what
all the other bullies have?
Excactly. I can't understand why people think they can have nukes, but others shouldnt be allowed too. Sure sure "Because else they could
bomb us".
So you just bomb them first huh? Because they can? Not saying they will but because they have the ability too? Hypocrisy at its best, some of you
posters make me sick. You should be ashamed of yourself. Thats like killing a random dude on the street because he is able and "might" kill you on a
later note.
Well the problem with Iran and nukes is that they have already threatened a nation to wipe them off the map, their also known to support terrorists
that they could just give the nukes to use on someone so Iran don't get blamed. If Iran was smart and didn't say anything about wiping Israel or
something they probably could of made it to have nukes but since they have threatened Israel that wont happen, as USA MUST protect the Jews its their
JOB
A few antisemites in Iran have threatened Israel. As a country, Iran has threatened nobody. It is all media lies.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:32 PM by SRTkid86
|
reply to post by earthman4
and the "few antisemites" who threatened them, also happen to be the people with the power to launch the missles.
i don't agree with going to war with Iran, and i agree that they should have the right to have a civil, no MILITARY, nuclear energy program. but
running around threatening to wipe the Iraeli regime off the map is not helping their case any.
they are a known terrorist supporter, and if bombing their nuclear facilities is what is needed to slow them down a bit, then im all for it. there
will be no invasion this time around folks, don't fool yourselves, we are smart enough to understand that, that simply isn't possible. but it would
be literally a small job for out air force, and navy planes to knock out their entire infrastructure and hamstring them
a little off topic, but with all this stuff going on in Georgia between the west and Russia has definately taken the attention off of the Iran issue,
long enough for us to plan,and get things ready for a bombing run on Iran.
i don't like where things are headed these days, but everyone should agree that we definately live in exciting times, that will definately be taught
in history class 20-30 years from now.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:42 PM by johnsky
|
Originally posted by daddymax
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
This is all good news. This all fits into Bush's plan for peace and freedom in the Middle East. You just have to imagine looking at it through the
eyes of Jesus...to agree with Bush, it is that simple.
WOW!!!
No, I'm quite sure that was sarcasm.
If it wasn't, then plucky has certainly had a change of 'faith'. lol.
I mean, "imagine looking at it through the eyes of Jesus"... and you'll agree with Bush? lol. How can that be serious?!
You know... Jesus... that loving character, who wanted peace and understanding. In case you've forgotten the role he played in that book.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:49 PM by pluckynoonez
|

reply to post by johnsky
Jesus likes bombing people, you have some different information or evidence?
Okay, I am kidding, I just like to run-off the Hannity-like party line garbage for the posters here who runn-off the Hannity-like party line garbage.
We are doomed. Nuking IRAN because we "fear what they might do in the future" is ill-fated logic based on murderous intent. Anyone who would want
to bomb women and children in the name of freedom should be strung-up by a testicle/ovary and spat upon by the people.
Sound more like plucky? Yes it does, because I detest old white men killing young people, tis that simple.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |