Pending US air strike on Iran: Dutch intel agents withdrawn, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 01:58 PM by Night Watchman
reply to post by pluckynoonez



PLucky, no one is going to nuke Iran. It's never going to happen. I'd suggest worrying about things that might actually happen.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 02:08 PM by chips
reply to post by Night Watchman



This guy would disagree with you:

(Two-minute clip about the U.S. nuking Iran)



(Wikipedia: Scott Ritter)


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 02:17 PM by pluckynoonez
Originally posted by Night Watchman
reply to
post by pluckynoonez



PLucky, no one is going to nuke Iran. It's never going to happen. I'd suggest worrying about things that might actually happen.


infowars picked-up on this:

infowars.net...

Never say never, love, remember this song?

ru.youtube.com...

And this movie?

ru.youtube.com...

The first video is about sex, the second about nuclear warheads, combine them and we are screwed. Don't try to knock my logic because "better to nuke them now for what they might do in the future..." logic is flimsy at best. And I'm not says you support that logic, but come now, to think Bushy/Cheney are not salivating over murdering innocent men, women, and children.

Remember this interview?

ru.youtube.com...

When asked if Cheney was going to attack IRAN he smirked and said "why would I want to do that?" I don't have the exact time mark, but he said it, which means we are doomed. It even says in the Bible it says that "CHENEY...the harbinger of death." Look it up.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 02:26 PM by Night Watchman
reply to post by pluckynoonez



Attacking Iran and nuking them are two different things Plucky. I'm not saying the US won't launch air strikes at some point, though I hope I am wrong. I just don't think an attack will include Nuclear weapons.

That said, while I don't often agree with you, I really enjoy your posts. Keep up the good work!



reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 05:13 PM by bubbles75
I am not sure at this point why the ships are in the Persian Gulf, to attack Iran, to stop Israeli false flags or just positioning as Russia has positioned itself around the US? Anyway an attack on Iran would have 2 possible consequences: either Russia, China, Venezuela, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, India and any other silent (but real) US enemies retaliate and WW3 starts or they let Iran be attacked and if Iran is not brought to its knees will result in a counter attack possibly nuclear or biological in kind against Europe and the US. Either way it is not in the interest of the US, the rest of the world will close its doors indefinitly to the EU and the US causing them to collapse. I don't see it happening because too many countries have stated that it would be totally unacceptable to attack Iran and they would seek to contain the US and the EU and that entails WW3. Another possibility is that the US will attack Iran to give Iran an excuse to attack Israel and possible destroy it. It is hard to try and guess what they will do, either way I think Iran will retaliate either straight away or when it sees fit with biological weapons or smart nukes. What the US needs to understand is that they are antagonizing just about every country in the world and if the world comes to the conclusion that it is either the US or us that will bring about WW3, it goes beyond Iran, but Iran could be the pretext for the rest of the world to stand up and be counted.
Many countries have nuclear weapons including Saudi Arabia, Libya, Indonesia and Brazil, it is just kept hush, hush..in the sense that nuclear inspectors have seized enriched uranium from these countries and is investigating how these countries came to aquire it....wake up, there are more nuclear countries out there than they let us know about, didn't they remove tons or enriched uranium from Iraq? If it is true then I bet you it was Iranian and not Iraqi and if Iran had that much uranium then they have tons of nukes, so go figure what the outcome will be. Don't forget that WW2 was about Jews being oppressed and the outcome of the war was that Jews owned the US and got Palestine on a plate of gold....now Muslims are the opressed, will they get Israel on a plate of gold? You are not going to discern anything from the news, these people are not about to tell you what their plans are and if the dutch intelligence knew about an attack they wouldn't tell the world and Iran about it in advance.


reply posted on 29-8-2008 @ 05:28 PM by sos37
reply to post by pluckynoonez



Infowars? You're citing Infowars as a credible source? Come ON. At least throw us a bone and give us something that's moderately non-biased.

This story doesn't make sense for the following reasons which some other people pointed out:

* Why would anyone release intelligence weeks in advance and tip Iran off?

* Why if anything would the U.S. use unmanned drones to deliver an initial strike on a country, especially if there are widespread, numerous targets?

* Don't you think it's more likely that an attack would come from Israel than from the U.S.?

* Iran did just admit to increasing their number of centrifuges to 4,000 (news.yahoo.com...). Do you think this news story may have had anything to do with the Dutch intel agents clearing out? Maybe they saw this and said, "Hey let's clear out of here before things get hot". Like maybe it's a precaution?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 13 hours ago, 108 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 9 hours ago, 89 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 12 hours ago, 48 replies