Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by Jezus
The evidence isn't new, we just see it differently.
Then, probably, that means that the evidence is not that strong.
This is the difference I'm speaking of...
Originally posted by ArMaP
Extraterrestrial presence on Earth (not as well documented as hallucinations) may also be an explanation, although always less likely to be the right explanation, like all other explanations for which we don't have strong evidences.
This is your initial statement.
It is illogical because you are extrapolating your view of some specific cases and applying it to all cases in general.
The blanket statement that extraterrestrials is "always less likely to be the right explanation" is fundamentally illogical.
gets people thinking.
