China Release New Fighter. The J-10., page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 28-5-2003 @ 09:35 PM by SeaBass
Originally posted by mad scientist
Aeroking

Half the facts you have stated above are completely wrong.

  • The Sabre fought the MIG-15 during the Korean war not the MIG-21.

  • Russian cruise missiles aren't the most advanced, they merely travel the fastest. However their accuracy is no where near the Tomahawk Block III.
    One Moskit could damage a carrier but it wouldn't take it out. Fleet defences are easily sufficient to take care of a few Moskit missiles. Considering they were designed to knock down mass attacks by the much faster Soviet AS-4 and AS-6 ASM's.

  • The submarine in The Hunt for Red October is not a diesel Kilo class, but a Typhoon class Russian SSBN. Anyway Kilos are 1970's techology, I believe a Chinese Kilo crew was lost just the other day.

  • Your much vaunted ' Xia ' class SSBN, is the worst design ever to go to see. Extremely noisy and dangerous to the crew. USS SSN's have tracked these submarines in the 3rd convergence ( over 150 km away). The JL-2 ( 'Great Wave') missiles they are armed with are unreliable and suffer from many technical problems.

  • You also seem to forget that while the Chicoms are producing the J-10 the US is beginning it's first production run of the F-22. A plane which could fly rings around the J-10 and Russian Sukhoi's.

  • Almost forgot your beloved Sovremmy's. If they attempted to venture into blue water they would be sunk before getting within 500 km of a CBG.



PS. It always helps to know what your talking about before you post


Couldn't have said it better myself


reply posted on 29-5-2003 @ 09:17 AM by GreatWall
Originally posted by mad scientist

Obviously you don't understand what the EP-3 was doing. I'll explain it one more time. It was flying in international waters collecting EM emmissions from China. Something which has been done around the world for the last 50 years. The only overt threat was your useless Chinese pilot ' Gung Ho ', who crashed into an unarmed plane. These are all undisputed facts.



Mad Scientist:
Tell me if the collection of army intelligence did by EP-3 was a kind of stealling. You are true, you have persued this kind of stealling for 50 years, that means "long period of stealling is not stealling any more???!!!" Actually, because US army is too strong, sometimes, we have no choice but keep silence, but that does not mean you are right. The stealling of my army intelligence put the safe of our whole country and our whole people in deep danger. This is a very serious kind of "stealling".
if you did science, you should understand the importance of any kind of intelligence, especially millitary intelligence. Do not tell me, because US is strong, and any kind of action you did is right, is legal.
Do not tell me, your invasion into Iraq is right, is to libert the people. Your real intention for the war is to control the fuel in Mid-East.
Do not tell me, American Spies all over the world are doing the right thing, the legal thing for the people all over the world.
Everyone has eyes, they can see, they can think......
What the US government and army did, are doing!!!
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 11 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 7 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 16 days ago with 0 member flags