Some people do not need guns, why would deadly force decisions police use be more stringent than one that a civilian can excercise that has absolutely
no training beyond knowing how to aim and shoot ? I had to give this one a hard look, I believe the only right this man had to do what he did was if
his life was in imminent danger or if he himself was not able to premeditate and decide to confront or avoid and keep his own self safe and removed
from harm or they were actually entering or was in his home, he introduced himself into the situation after notifying police and he was in absolutely
no danger, this in itself should be considered criminal.
It is pitiful to think that Mr. Horn must have at least observed these activities of breaking and entering for some time before calling the police and
recognized it as such and possibly assessed if they were even armed or not, for one he saw some people that were apparently stealing which it does
turn out they were doing, but to put one situation out there such as suppose these were relatives or someone simply breaking in to get their own
property back or clothes after some family dispute, Mr. Horn's judgement and observations quickly arrived at they were robbers.
Mr. Horn from what I heard on the 911 tape was looking for an endorsement or atta boy of sorts for committing murder, he was in his own home, he was
in contact with 911 and police were on the scene within minutes, this allows a non professional to make a professional decision in some ways is a hand
off especially he was only a witness to the robbery, this leaves a huge window of error, not that police do not make mistakes.
If you listen to this idiot on the phone the 911 operator clearly explains to him the common sense approach to the situation and repeatedly warned him
to stay in his house since the police have now been contacted and dispatched, to me I hope that justice is somehow served to this individual through
either a higher court or legal proceeding, there is absolutely no excuse for what he did regardless of the weak, old west hang em high law that exists
there.
He seems like a trigger happy individual by his responses and defiant tone that was itching for any opportunity to take advantage of the law. I like
my neighbors and some I do not like, but I do not love my neighbors enough to kill someone stealing after I have notified 911 and especially do not
feel I would confront them after I know full well the police are on their way and I am in my house out of harms way, these guys were fleeing the house
they weren't holding the neighbor hostage, or harmed anyone, Mr. Horn actually knew the neighbor was not home also.
I am not endorsing the wrong actions of the burlars neither am I endorsing the judge juror and execution role Mr. Horn played when he chose to
introduce himself to the situation and actually we really don't know the real facts of what he mentioned about them coming onto his property that
could have been his excuse, for all we know did he drag them back to his property ? and why were they shot in the back? he told them don't move after
the first shot, we know they were illegal immigrants, did they understand him? i do not believe his story offered to cover for himself because he
already stated knowledge of the newly passed law and knew that would be the only way he could ambush the robbers and murder them.
[edit on 2-7-2008 by phinubian]