It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Animal
Shameful. Killing over robbery? Shooting people in the back justified? Something about this does not seem very legitimate to me.
"Deadly force" to protect your property seems like a very slippery and dangerous slope.
Shooting someone for stealing my old broken down hibachi grill? What the hell is wrong with people today?
This to me is a perfect example of why state sovereignty should be trumped by the federal government.
Originally posted by Rilence
Society does not punish burglary and theft by imposing the death penalty, so what gives an individual the right to do so ?
This man is a double murderer, plain and simple...He should be charged and found guilty of same, and then placed on death row, like other murderers...
Texas is obviously an antiquated backwater full of neanderthals and redneck numbskulls...
Originally posted by Rilence
Society does not punish burglary and theft by imposing the death penalty, so what gives an individual the right to do so ?
This man is a double murderer, plain and simple...He should be charged and found guilty of same, and then placed on death row, like other murderers...
Texas is obviously an antiquated backwater full of neanderthals and redneck numbskulls...
Originally posted by Zealott
Personally I'd never shoot someone in the back to protect some stuff. But I can see why someone would. I would have no problem with a sort of hunting season on taggers gang bangers and home invaders.