It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by italkyoulisten
I would definitely allow it. The reason being, I don't think pedophiles choose to be pedophiles, like how gay people don't just one day decide to be gay. Maybe they've liked little kids ever since they were little kids?
So they should allow animated child pornography because it doesn't hurt anyone while at the same time relieving pedophiles. Hopefully this will help keep the pedophiles at bay.
Originally posted by OrangeAlarmClock
Allowed I think.
Pedo's are going to get their rocks off somehow, you can't stop them all. I'd rather have them watching computer generated child porn instead of real child porn, or worse, have them out raping/molesting kids.
[edit on 29-6-2008 by OrangeAlarmClock]
and a newspaper article from the 80s about the White House
www.franklincase.org... and a summary www.franklincase.org...
Originally posted by DemonicAngelZero
Wow... I never expected ANYONE here to say allow it. Pedophiles are pedophiles, end of story. By allowing them lolicon, you feed their sexual desire for children. Ok, it doesn't hurt a real child... yet. You can't say it will prevent them from raping a child. Instead of feeding their screwed up desires, they should be in intensive counseling and kept away from children for the rest of their lives. Allowing them lolicon will NOT fulfill their urges for little kids. Otherwise, pornography would remove our desire for sex. Can you say that's what pornography does to you? Do you lose all interest in real sex because you're so obsessed with Naughty Nurses XVII?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
It does lessen desire for sex, with a lot of people.
After Naughty Nurse, a lot of men are ready to go to sleep, not go out to the club to score.
Originally posted by Incarnated
I'm not sure what it is, but I don't like it.