posted on Jun, 29 2008 @ 08:43 AM
While extremely disturbing to a normal person, no child was harmed in the making of said picture. If, on the other hand, said picture was shown to a
child, I think the regard changes drasticly. (No one should be showing ANY porn to children.)
Don't answer this question but how many people do you know that have a history of taking sexual advantage of a minor?
Almost 100% of females are sexually assaulted before they turn 18 by a male at least 2 years older then them.
In to many cases, the female consented but listen, if a 12 year old girl says yes to a 30 year old man, it's still sexual abuse of a minor.
The first time I had access to porn, I was younger then 5. That was in the early 1970s. Today, a 5 year old can go to google, type in "insert dirty
word here", and presto-10 billion naked images for your child's viewing pleasure.
The powers involved for making the internet function could easily require all pornography to be at a xxx.(website name here).com domain, making it
simple for parents to lock out xxx.*.* access. That would be a start.
But you have certain clothing companies that think it's okay to make thong underware for pre-puberty girls. It takes a number of people to take such
a product from concept to sales rack.
The fact is, many, many people are willing to line up in an effort to exploit minors in any sexual way they can.
Watch just about any Disney movie and notice some of the "subtle" language used that is USUALLY over a child's head, but an adult will understand
the hidden message.
Why is Disney putting overtly subtle messages in it's films?
Again, people will line up in mass to sexually exploit children.
In the olden days, 20 year old men married 13 year old girls because everybody was usually dead before they hit 30.
Thankfully, advances have been made so that we can lighten up on the marry to survive mentality.
However, many are slow to board the train that takes them to a world that frowns on taking sexual advantage of a child.
Heck, look up the CONVICTED predators living in your neighborhood. Remember, those are just your neighbors that got turned in.
How many times did you speed or run a red light before you finally got a ticket? And how many tickets did you have to get before you finally got one
that would not be dismissed with defensive driving?
Apply those same numbers to convicted child abusers. Of the small percentage that get caught, most (and I do mean most) investigations are terminated
due to a lack of evidence or because the statue of limitations has expired.
Now you have an idea of how many adults are in your neighborhood that would like to hop in the sack with your little girl. Or your little boy.
If you can walk past three houses in your neighborhood and not one of those houses has someone in that that wants to take advantage of a child, it's
because at least one of those houses is vacant.
Now, consider all the people that have those impulses and can control them enough not to act on them. Now how many houses can you walk by?
The law will always be soft on child abuse. Now you know why.
My best guess is that 1 out of 3 men would love to see your little girl naked if they thought they could get away with it.
On that note, have a great day!