Animated Child Pornography - Allow It Or Ban It?, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 05:40 PM by jmdewey60
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
It should not be ALLOWED at all!!! By allowing it, they allow the sickos to get their fix, and that SHOULD NOT HAPPEN!! If someone has even animated child porn, they should be strung up and killed.

I suppose all the kids playing violent video games are going to become mass murderers, too.
If someone can get there "fix" in a way that does not hurt anyone, would that not be a good thing?
Kids who, back in the day, could take out their hostile feelings by old style contact sports, have to stay indoors and do it on video games.
People who back in the day had normal interactions with kids, could now, at least be able to live it out with some cartoons.
I guess murdering people is the right answer, to some people.
Too much to ask to allow people to satisfy themselves, alone, at home.
I hope none of the people here, calling out for blood, are judges.
Amazingly foolish, to me.
The cases that I know about in Florida, where kids were murdered, had nothing to do with pornography.
I guess everyone who smokes marijuana is going to end up as heroin addicts, too, according to your logic.
How about all the people driving cars, the need for speed that takes over as soon as you get moving?
You just can not take your foot off the gas pedal until you are going 120 mph.
Things do not work the way you imagine it.

[edit on 29-6-2008 by jmdewey60]



reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 05:41 PM by gekko
reply to post by OhZone

Producers? Illustrators you mean.

You to sir makes me think of certain muslim extremists.




reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 05:53 PM by gekko
reply to post by pikypiky

Thats an interesting thought.

I think subliminal advertising has been pretty much debunked. Some sort of aversive therapy perhaps?


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:01 PM by gekko
reply to post by OhZone

Oh you are so clever!! Such well thought trough arguments.

Sure I watch porn, never known a lad that didn't.

Not what were talking about here though. Please stay on topic.

Edit to ad: I happen to work in advertising, and you're full of crap.

[edit on 29/6/08 by gekko]



reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:16 PM by Anti-Tyrant
reply to post by gekko



Perhaps i have been approaching the argument in a illogical fashion.

You speak of the benefits that this "art", if you would call it that, can bring to society - that people can find it within themselves to suppress their 'habitual' thoughts when nessecary.

No doubt people can.

Unfortunately, i can't shake this idea that i must've picked up from somewhere that makes me think that this "art" and the other types of "art" also allow people to revel in their devolved obssessions.

It would seem that we are simply looking at a coin from either side, so to speak.

Perhaps we're both right, and pornography leads to both positive and negative effects.

Somewhat chaotically, i might add.


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:26 PM by pikypiky
reply to post by gekko



I am just now looking up 'aversion therapy' and a bunch of other thoughts came to my mind. I was thinking about how prisoners could be utilized as random samples in a study on the effectiveness of this 'aversion therapy'. But I don't know about torture from electric shock. Maybe this is the only way to make sure those who end up being released from prison from sexually deviant acts won't pursue their 'bad', habitual behavior from re-occurring later on. I dunno. It's worth a try for the benefit of society.

[edit on 2008-6-29 by pikypiky]


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:39 PM by jmdewey60
reply to post by pikypiky



Have you ever seen the movie, The Clockwork Orange?
Aversion Therapy is not a long term solution.
This case north of where I live, in Florida, this sicko kept a ten year old, for like eight days, in a single wide trailer with his sister and three other people living there.
How could they not have known she was there?
The authorities (prosecutor) decided not to question them after they dug the girl's body out of the yard.
I think the problem is with law enforcement, and not the cops necessarily, but the judges and government attorneys, who let repeat offenders (he was,and was allowed to live next door to his victim) run wild over the population.


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:46 PM by alienj
reply to post by ImaginaryReality1984



You are naive to think pedophiles are going to stop at animated child porn or even listening to a pedaphile. Did you know the recidivism rate of pedphiles that have undergone treatment is like 80 percent return to abuse another child. After animated porn comes real porn come the child.... I tend to wonder why you even brought this conversation up. Anything that could lead to harming the most vunerable among us should not be allowed. Children in my eyes is a national treasure we should do everything in out power to protect. My advise to you is to never believe the criminal....he is always innocent.


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:52 PM by gekko
reply to post by Anti-Tyrant

I don't call it art. I suppose it could be, but as I haven't seen any I don't really know.

It might be as you say that it works both ways, but I have not once heard of serious research confirming the old "porn leads to more extreme porn" myth.

WARNING EXPLIT CONTENT:

From my own experience; I can easily use drawn erotic graphic novels to "relieve" myself and keep women off my mind, so I presume it would be the same for paedos with drawings of kids.

reply to post by pikypiky and post by jmdewey60



I thought of Clockwork to, but it might work without being that extreme. I have no idea.


reply posted on 29-6-2008 @ 06:58 PM by _Phoenix_
Originally posted by alienj
reply to
post by ImaginaryReality1984



You are naive to think pedophiles are going to stop at animated child porn

Well that depends on wether they are good or bad. Being a pedophile is simply the fact that they are attracted to preteen humans, from that fact alone we can assume 99% of pedophiles do not go out and "abuse" children, because of course most know it's wrong, and would never hurt a child.

There is a difference from fantasy and reality. I'm pretty sure most videogamers fantasise about killing when playing games, but they would never do it in real life and if they did they would probably throw up, haha.

Thinking logically, that is how it is. Pedophile/fantasies and a child molester are two totally different things.



[edit on 29-6-2008 by _Phoenix_]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags
pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags