Alien Spaceships Around Stargate/Time Portal? Take Out Your Telescopes Now!, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 45 times


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 12:20 AM by ShatteredSkies
reply to post by mikesingh



Just trying to bring realistic reasoning and logic to the table is all.

We need to look at how this can't be possible before we look at how it is possible.

At least then we got the bases covered.

Shattered OUT...


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 03:34 AM by Anonymous ATS
I hate to say it, but the quality of images in Google Sky is awful. Their compression is choppy, with whole chunks missing and the wrong color. If you want to see good images, there are real tools like SkyView ( skyview.gsfc.nasa.gov... ) and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ( www.sdss.org... ) and the research-grade Aladin Sky Atlas ( aladin.u-strasbg.fr... ). Seriously. I was excited when I heard about Google Sky, only to zoom around and see garbage in almost every field of view. I don't know how they can let this image set sit there for month after month when better images have been available on the web for years now -- it's embarrassing.

Anyone who is cataloging the image errors in Google Sky is wasting their time. They use the same image sources as the other sites I mentioned, they just mangle them all. Check out the good stuff and see how it compares.

Also, if an object is in medium Earth orbit, its location on the sky depends on the observer's location on earth, due to simple triangulation. Any exact position given could vary by a few degrees if you're on the other side of the globe.

And the guy who claims that space junk shows up in every space image has obviously never seen good astrophotography. Aircraft lights do foul up a lot of photos, but space junk, no. It is absolutely false that as you focus on a distant star you're imaging "a huge part of the sky". Most sky photos cover only a few arcminutes -- less than a millionth of the sky. Even the simplest reckoning says you'd need over a million chunks of BRIGHT space junk before one will "always" be in shot. I know of very very few ground-based images of even the brightest objects in orbit. Though the shape of the Space Station can just barely be made out from a mid-range telescope on the ground.

Have fun exploring the sky, but quit talking rubbish, folks.

Sorry for the anonymous post, but I'm really tired of signing up for new websites & forums. If you're going to flame me (because you always flame anyone who actually knows something), you can call me ScottV.


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 04:31 AM by free-energy
Originally posted by free-energy
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Can anyone tell me why there is a RED SQUARE where the portal by Arcturus is suppose to be? It was on Google Sky and looks a lot like the "blank" areas on Google earth when they dont want you to see something......

link


This is where Google used an image from a second source to complete the picture...

[edit on 22-6-2008 by free-energy]


I found a discussion between the astronomers working on the project. There was a problem processing the colors and some of the images look bad. The last post was on July 09 2008. they were discussing how the algorithms for red were not working right.

I didn't mark the link and now I can't find it again.

Astronomers work with glass plates and large negatives and digitizing them causes some of the anomalies. You can see the edges of the plates in the red rectangle.

It's hard honest work. That doesn't mean I trust NASA.
I'm still new here and will try to be more diligent in bringing proof.

"That's a completely reliable figure Dave" - HAL


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 11:39 AM by Flux8
reply to post by Anonymous ATS



Doesn't take an astronomer to realize the object I watched in late 2007, slightly above and to the right of the triangle of stars was inside our solar system. The first time I saw it, it was a reddish haze. The next time I saw it (~2 weeks later) it was a red dot and inside the triangle (it had moved and changed shape).

This doesn't mean it's "alien spaceships/stargates", it could still be a natural event. But to state infatically that it is a celestial phenomenon (supernova?) without providing proof of your claim is just as falacious a claim as alien spaceships.

On a side note: I don't want to come off as rude or attacking but instead of using one account for several people you should create your own accounts individually. After reading your responses you come off as a schizophrenic with multiple personality disorder. It's hard to follow your collective reasoning. Seriously... get your own accounts.


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 01:14 PM by skywatch
i want to share this with you and i want to share it in this thread.

last years sumnmer i once was tracking a sattelite when just beside another lit up, moved at 90 degress angle away from the sattelites path and turned off (turned its light off) as quickly again..

well this year is somewhat very different

i've seen these starts moving very close to earth and shining very brightly, i mean big and easy to spot in a rural area.
they are not flickering at all.. shining sometimes as bright as venus, they are not moving in constant speed or direction and most of all
they turn off after like 20-100 seconds, as if their cloaking is sometimes not perfect.

in start of may i saw one (at least) every night for around 10 days... EVERY NIGHT... sometimes multiple objects where seen, but most interesting of all i could feel when they were out there... i just knew and looked up and found them..

some of then were near the big dipper, but all of them were moving fast as if cruising very near to earth.
it was not possible to tell how near because of the bright light, the light were somewhat changing and when turning on the cloaking they dimmered for half a second then turned off or stayed dimmered for 10 secs slowly going away..

THIS was seen above sealand, and above copenhagen in Denmark.

im not joking, it continued to the end of last month..
this month i have "only" seen one U.F.O

GO OUTSIDE PEOPLE, look with your eyes, It only takes a minut and somehow in this minute you will hit one in a million...
or otherwise im very special..

i've been watching the night sky everytime im under it for the last year, when i walk, or just when im going out with the trash..

its easy to spot movement and also movement of shimmering objects.


and apologizations for the spelling (o;



reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 01:30 PM by iesus_freak
reply to post by mikesingh

dont yout think others would have found out about this already and why would we believe him if hes for some strange reason the only person who can find out about it im kinda skeptical


reply posted on 22-6-2008 @ 01:54 PM by skywatch
reply to post by iesus_freak



yes, some of time ive got my girlfriend out in the night to see it, so i have a witness.
but others must have witnessed this or maybe its like when nobody looks a whole country is not seeing by accident.
but i had my first of these sights by accident...

or nearly i looked at the starts... maybe nobody likes to look at stars anymore
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags