Originally posted by spacevisitor
Well waveguide3, I must admit that you done really a great job.
But there still is a big difference with the Stevenville video, and I mean the figures or Symbols so to speak.
You produce again and again almost the same sort of figures which ends each time also with the abrupt stop, but that is because of your movement with the telescope.

The 'symbols' created in this experiment are controlled by the way the telescope/camera rig vibrates. It's quite massive, as I said in the write up. It tends to vibrate the same way no matter where to thump it. It also stops quickly because it's heavy. It's not the same as a hand-held camera which will jiggle every which way according to your stance and heatbeats. The original video is taken at high power/zoom, so the field is small and the slightest bodily movement is exaggerated. It can't be controlled if there's any bodily contact with the camera. Conclusive proof would come from anyone with a similar camcorder taking a simple 'closeup' video of Sirius. It's that easy and I can't understand why nobody's taken the trouble to do it. All the theoretical arguments in the world will never beat a practical demonstration.

WG3

Originally posted by waveguide3
Perhaps it says more about them than of the event which triggered the flap.

Agreed. Aside from the distraction of this video, the event itself is still quite a puzzle. It's not every day that huge weird airships fly around so that a bunch of different people can see and describe them in pretty good detail. It would have been nice if somebody got a good image of the thing(s). But such is the world of UFO spotting. We never quite get the good evidence we'd like.

Isn't there one good clip or video of the object? I thought I saw something in a news video, but it could have just been something they added randomly.

The video is a hoax and i can prove it! think im a lier email me wtf69696969@yahoo.com and ill send you three or four still frames from the video i made in fla and ill explain the prosses he used to create his video. I hope no one paid him anything for this lmao. they ought to pay me for explainning how he did it . Nice job though , he put some thought and time into it .
CJ

If you can prove it, then prove it here.

I think the "strobing" was caused by lights on the UFO. So this really is the UFO on film, but not quite how it looks at all. The camera mode screwed it up A LOT.

Good to hear they figured it out...I try watching that show in hopes that they will get a case that has some meat on it. I don't know the guys name...but the lead investigator drives me up the wall. He makes it sound like every case is going to end with proof, when we all know at the end of the show there will be nothing. Not a great show IMO. They're getting payed.

I think people should be more critical of videos that have no reference point to judge size or distance of objects. A video that stays zoomed in where its all black or all blue/white except the object should always be assumed a hoax or misconception before trying to prove it right.

I have filmed something very similar to this about 2 years ago.. I will have to see if i still have it on tape.

What i filmed turned out to be a normal star, but due to me not having the cam on a tripod ( though i did have it held very steady ) i got the exact same swirling lights effect.

The tapes are coming out, ill post as soon as i find it.