Asteroid 2007 TU24 has NASA concerned., page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 130 times


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 02:51 PM by aaaauroraaaaa
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to
post by aaaauroraaaaa



Please... Feel free to enlighten us about what really happened in Russia In 1908 with the Tunguska meteorite, which didn't actually crash into earth?

How is plasma discharge bunk?


Aasteroid 2007 TU24 will pass roughly 560,000 kilometers (330,000 miles) from the Earth on January 29, 2008. A bit far for a plasma discharge, don't you think?


No, our magnetosphere in front of the earth's orbit extends not more than 100,000km. However, it extends 4,000,000 to 7,000,000km at the rear end of our orbit(the path we come from on the orbit around the sun), which is where TU24 will be crossing.


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 03:17 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by aaaauroraaaaa



Does that mean that we are negatively charged and that is the reason we do not "fall from Earth"?

Or did I misunderstood what you wrote?


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 03:22 PM by aaaauroraaaaa
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to
post by aaaauroraaaaa



Does that mean that we are negatively charged and that is the reason we do not "fall from Earth"?

Or did I misunderstood what you wrote?


The latter.

I meant that if there was 0 charge, there would be no gravity.
If you have a charge, you then have gravity, and one would not "fall" from the earth.


reply posted on 20-1-2008 @ 03:32 PM by ArMaP
reply to post by aaaauroraaaaa

I thought it was a misunderstanding, it's very common with me.

Could you explain it better? It's the first time I have read about this.




reply to post by aaaauroraaaaa

Does that difference in charge affected all the (probably positively charged) probes that were sent from Earth to Mars?

Or I am misuderstanding you again?
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^