Ron Paul keeps white supremacist donation , page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 12:42 PM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by geemony
So what he took money from a man who pushes white pride. Whats the difference here, its the same as Al Sharpton taking money from the NAACP a black pride organization.


I kinda agree.

It's the same as OBAMA taking money from his
black power church that blames the white man for everything and talks about being true to their real homeland - Africa.

I'm sure Obama gets money from many of those people. But of course we'd all be racists if we dared to talk about it, right?

Ron Paul can take money from who ever he wants.
Ron Paul can choose to keep the money or give it back, whatever he wants.
Ron Paul will have to live with the fall out from his freely made choices.


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 12:56 PM by xEphon
reply to post by FredT



I can't resist this thread.

Read!

Black said he supports Paul's stance on ending the war in Iraq, securing U.S. borders and his opposition to amnesty for illegal immigrants.
"We know that he's not a white nationalist. He says he isn't and we believe him, but on the issues, there's only one choice," Black said Wednesday.

"We like his stand on tight borders and opposition to a police state," Black told The Palm Beach Post earlier.


Now please enlighten everyone why his personal ideology is even in question regarding the donation?
You talk of ethics and morality concerning a neutral political contribution - in which race has no bearing - and expect people to be offended somehow?
It' amazing how far you have to dig to find dirt on Ron Paul.
Surely your ilk can do better than this.



reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 01:12 PM by geemony
Originally posted by xEphon
Now please enlighten everyone why his personal ideology is even in question regarding the donation?
You talk of ethics and morality concerning a neutral political contribution - in which race has no bearing - and expect people to be offended somehow?
It' amazing how far you have to dig to find dirt on Ron Paul.
Surely your ilk can do better than this.


I think its because Ron Paul has been pretty clean through out his political life, he has every one of those agenda mongers in DC scared to death that the American people might somehow be able to think for themselves and vote their conscience. Paul’s message and plan for America is so far above the others that all they can do is try and link Mr. Black's lame ass donation of 500 dollars, to a racist agenda. Because Mr. Black takes pride in his color, this makes him a bad person. Give me a break, this is all they focus on. I really hope that the American people will see through the smoked glass and concentrate on what Paul’s message and plan means to the future safe guarding of our country.

So many of my fellow members here at ATS claim to hate the government and cry about the lost freedoms and rights. Well get off your arses and vote in Ron Paul. You want a revolution, you want change, you call for the American people to stand up and say we have had enough. Then do something about it and vote in Ron Paul. Do you really want change in America? Then do something about it or quit yer bitchen!!!


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 01:53 PM by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by pai mei



We call that "democracy" here. Special interest pays politician's bills, politician returns the favor. Bribes are illegal, but contributions backed by lobbying is perfectly fine, wink wink nudge nudge.

$500 to Ron Paul from StormFront's founder? Geeze. Guess he didn't want to hamper his beer budget.


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 03:18 PM by Palasheea
Originally posted by FredT
reply to
post by NGC2736



I think it goes beyond a persons rights.

Yes that man no matter how twisted his beliefs are is entitled to "Try" to make a donation. However it is also the right AND responsability of the Paul campaign to look at where his money is comming from.

If he takes money from white supremists, what about NAMBLA? Hizbollah? or any of the other groups most here find repugnant.

He and his campaign can make up whatever reason they want as to why they are going to keep it, but this will cost him in the long run far more than the $500 he got from this guy. It speaks to charecter, ....


I TOTALLY agree with you on this one FredT. At the present time, I can't think of ANY current presidential candidate who would accept a donation from such an individual and it's mind boggling that Ron Paul was willing to accept it. By doing so, he's sending out a message BIG TIME, that he personally has no issues with white supremacists and regardless if that's true or not, his acceptance of that donation is most definitely sending out the message that he supports their ideology.

Heck, even small time local politicians of any stripe stay clear of taking any donations from those guys because by doing so... it's political suicide!

So here we have a presidential candidate accepting such a donation and I can assure anyone here, that as a result of doing that, this donation is going to haunt him for the rest of his campaign.

Too bad because I was willing to read up more on Ron Paul's platform but now that this has happened... I have no interest in doing that any longer.


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 03:37 PM by redmage
Good grief!

I really feel like going out and temporarily joining every single group that's ever been looked down upon, then making piddley donations to each candidate's campaign. Here's the clincher... make sure to take a photograph of one's self, with each check/bill, with the serial number(s) clearly visible. That way, if a candidate decides to send your money back, you can show that they didn't necessarily send your money back, but kept it, and sent someone elses!

Then you can contact the MSM and show that all of these candidates "support" subversive causes!

Lets see. What to join first? Is is wrong to join a "white pride" and a "black pride" group at the same time? What about brown, red, and yellow pride too?

Gotta include the ACLU & Planned Parenthood for my GOP donations, then a NAMBLA member's donation should piss off both sides equally...

Let's here it for the MSM for giving Black a little nationwide coverage, and his 15 minutes of fame!

Come on people! $500 is a mere drop in the bucket, and wouldn't even come close to getting the ear of a candidate for some one on one time, let alone "sway" them regarding their beliefs.

As far as I'm concerned, that's $500 less in hate pamphlets being printed. $500 less ammunition in the hands of a racist. $500 dollars less in materials to build & burn crosses. Do I need to go on?

For all we know, that $500 donation may be the ONLY "good thing" this man has ever done, and people still want to take that away.

If this is the best "mudslinging" that the MSM can come up with (against RP), they're really scraping the bottom of the barrel, in an effort to find any "skeletons" in his closet, and it seems they're coming up pretty empty handed.

Props to RP. I'm confident he'll use the money in a far more responsible manner than that racist would have. And, props to the racist for at least doing one thing right in his life. Let's hope he continues the trend, and changes his racist ways.

[edit on 12/20/07 by redmage]


reply posted on 20-12-2007 @ 03:54 PM by pavil
reply to post by FredT




One could contend that Perot effectively decided the election by running. Perot garnered 18.9% of the vote and Bush only lost to Clinton by 5.7% of the popular vote. Electoral vote wise it would have been different, but Clinton did not have a landslide win in 1992.
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 14 hours ago, 106 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 12 hours ago, 69 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 8 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 replies