NASA Admits to Storms and Dust Clouds on the Moon, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 03:17 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by zorgon



Here's loads of info on the Apollo "Pressure Garment Assemblies" and their "Extravehicular Mobility Units."

From a Japanese "fansite":
ApolloManiacs | Apollo Space Suit

From a NASA pdf, which also covers shuttle suits:
Space Suit Evolution | From Custom Tailored To Off-The-Rack


But, according to this site, they just left the backpacks or EMUs, behind:
The space suits had to meet all the astronauts' life-support needs. Backpacks (left on the Moon) provided oxygen, temperature and humidity control, suit pressure, and power for their communications and data display systems.
Emphasis mine
Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum | APOLLO LUNAR SUIT


[edit on 9-12-2007 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 03:52 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by tep200377
Look at page 22
www.hq.nasa.gov...
Not exactly what you where looking for, but anyways ..


Yup thanks pretty good list of the litter we left behind I will look it over tonight and see if it has what I am seeking

Thanks


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 05:27 PM by IgnoreTheFacts
Originally posted by zorgon

Actually NO I was showing clouds long before John told me about the possibility of a "breathable atmosphere" and the comments all were there are no clouds... there are no dust storms...


I don't recall those conversations, but I wasn't around and didn't know you when you were not with John, so I just related any of this to the atmosphere discussion out of habit, lol.

I don't find it at all surprising to find you now stating "Oh yeah it makes sense... we have know about this effect for some time..."

To be quite frank... its really ridiculous... If you knew so much about this dust phenomena then please explain to me why you did not present this as a counter argument before?


Sorry, didn't mean to come across in the manner you obviously took this. The times you have brought this up before when I was involved you were trying to use it in a thread (or part of a thread, can't remember) to support the atmosphere argument on the moon. Since this known (albeit not fully understood) phenomenon in no way contributed to you and John's conclusions of a breathable atmosphere, I ignored (ha, ha...me ignore something) for obvious reasons. You brining it up before did not serve but to confuse and obfuscate, and I didn't want to bother. But I must apologize, here is a different thread about it, and if you would like to discuss this natural phenomenon without the context of supporting some of you and John's absurd conclusions then I say move it to space exploration or another forum, as you mentioned in another thread recently, what does this have to do with a conspiracy? I mean, your not using it to back up any wild claims, just want to discuss the science and technical nature of the phenomenon, right? What's good for the goose is good for the gander.


you guys are really something Where in this presentation on Levitating dust storms did I mention "breathable atmosphere"? Thats why I put this in a separate thread... This thread is about CLOUDS


I apologize, I seem to have a knee jerk reaction when someone mention clouds to go straight to the breathable atmosphere subject, as I recell the whole clouds thing comoing up during multiple discuss of a breathable atmosphere. I am wrong to assume, or try to read between the lines.

... seems YOU on the other hand are not as smart as I gave you credit for...


Sorry to disappoint you, lol. I have been pretty sick the last couple of days, can I use that as an excuse? (and I do mean really sick) Also, please excuse any grammatical or spelling errors, head is a little cloudy (mmmmmm...morphine)

I have a feeling no matter what I present you would gain nothing... despite what you claim you know...


Ha, gotcha. Your wrong on that one. I am pretty stubborn, but I do keep an open mind. There have been several important things you have posted that I followed up that changed my outlook on two key discussions in this forum. Naturally, I would never give you credit or normally never acknowledge it aloud, as your head is probably to big to fit in the door already. I wonder, though, if there is anything the we post that you absorb as well?


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 06:00 PM by pepsi78
Not only that but apollo missions coincided not only with storms but solar flaers that give out imense radiation busts from the sun.
Such event ocured betwen 1960 and 1974.
Today astonauts don't even go in orbit when such events are taking place.

April 17,1972 one of the bigest solar flares of the century and nasa was mooning the moon on the exact same date.
adsabs.harvard.edu...
Just as a reminder , Apollo 16 launched on 16 April 1972 at 17:54:00
They would of fried on the moon, with a radiation storm and of course they allegedly spent nearly 20 hours outside the LEM in
the searing sunlight during the solar flare and took about 250 degrees F.
of heat with out any problems at all.






[edit on 9-12-2007 by pepsi78]


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 06:08 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
There have been several important things you have posted that I followed up that changed my outlook on two key discussions in this forum.


Granted I will give you that...


Naturally, I would never give you credit or normally never acknowledge it aloud, as your head is probably to big to fit in the door already.


Hmmm Its not so bad if I take the crown off first... but your reasons are more likely to do with 'repercussions' than any sense of inflating my ego


I wonder, though, if there is anything the we post that you absorb as well?


Naturally, I would never give you credit or normally never acknowledge it aloud, as your head is probably to big to fit in the door already.



But seriously if you could prove to me that there are no secret space stations I would concede...

If you could prove to me there is atmosphere or clouds on the moon.. I would concede...

Problem is the Skeptic view generally believes "you cannot prove a negative" so they don't have to do anything to prove it LOL

Now take the other thread for a second... the one "Lear expertice needed!(or anyone else)" Lots of good info came out of that one seems I touched a few nerves there alright

Same in the Nasa Scientist thread 39,000 views 104 flags 56 stars in less than 6 hours AND a personal appearance by James Oberg

Yup touched some nerves there too...

Skeptics told us ... "Just wait the Chinese and Japanese ships wil prove you wrong... but I bet you will just say its all fake..."

Well look at the current snaffu with China's 'image' Within hours the fuss spread like wild fire and the Chinese hit the world press with a defense...

I didn't have to say a word just sit back and watch the "I told you so" unfold

ArMaP is a skeptic and has made many points I have agreed with. but he works hard to present his case... not just scream insults and indignation

I have said many times I don't have all the answers that is why I am here looking for them. But I have found enough evidence to convince me that main stream science doesn't have them either and is changing them faster than I can pull up my socks

We often get accused of "If you don't know then don't present it" Well 'scientists' do exactly the same thing and they write and submit papers to support it and get paid...
Here is a prime example of what I mean... about the Core of Neptune....

www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 9-12-2007 @ 08:38 PM by Gorman91
reply to post by zorgon



Moon dusts has always been known about I thought. I mean, it's just crystalline structures that float like mist.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



"My God, its full of stars!"
  Posted 19 days ago with 83 member flags
Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 8 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 2 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 16 days ago with 28 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 12 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 9 days ago with 19 member flags