Greetings Matyas, I see I touched your nerve and you went a little ballistic in your post:
Originally posted by Matyas
The good doctor BS is a different story. His excuse is ignorance
It is?
for example n another thread he just told me ballistic trajectories (what I call attributes of the atmosphere) of charged particles on the
Moon's surface is without merit.
Wait... Ballistic trajectories of charged particles are somehow an attribute of the atmosphere? That's a non sequitur. Get your logic
straight.
I suspect his claims of expertise is without merit.
This is entirely your right, however you haven't even started an intelligent conversation on the subject of interaction of radiation and media.
How can anyone study the paths of charged particles in a medium with as much significant effort as he says he did and still not have heard of
ballistics?
Oh yes I have heard of ballistics. It has little to nothing to do with interaction of moving charged particles or photons (often referred to as
radiation) with a medium:
Ballistics (gr. ba'llein, "throw") is the science of mechanics that deals with the motion, behavior, and effects of projectiles, especially
bullets, gravity bombs, rockets, or the like
And now to:
And the rest is just downhill. Charged particles cannot bounce on a surface of like charge
They can't?
|
