It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien fleet/formation in high altitude pic

page: 1
5
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:35 PM
link   
www.coasttocoastam.com...

The above link is to a still picture taken from the window of an aeroplane flying from Phoenix, AZ to Buffalo, NY. It shows four distinct shapes travelling at high altitude but what are they??




posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:43 PM
link   
Definitely unidentified flying objects, as in, I don't know what they are. Could be alien craft in formation.

Good photo in either case.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:46 PM
link   
I just emailed the submitter of the picture and asked him for the original. We'll see if I get a response. I am sure he is getting lots of requests for the original. I will keep everyone updated here.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:49 PM
link   
I see contrails with two of them so those are most likely jets. Don't know what the other two are unless it's a reflection from the two with contrails somehow? Nice photo by the way Turbohale.
Or was that taken by someone else? Anyway still nice pic.


[edit on 11/25/2007 by Solarskye]



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Excellent photo great quality, how long into the flight was the picture taken? if that can be worked out we can tell which part of the US the objects where roughly in, Great find.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:50 PM
link   
Nice one KDIAL hopefully we can get a copy of the original. To me the picture looks 100% genuine but hey you never know lol. The close up is interesting and it definately looks like an alien fleet to me as meteors/comets dont fly in formation (not last time I looked) however have we any aircraft capable of flying in the upper atmosphere??? the blackbird springs to mind but these are silver ha ha.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:53 PM
link   
Very Interesting pic... I want to say that it is pieces of a meteor entering the atmosphere, but they are too aligned. It could be CGI....I am no expert though.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:56 PM
link   
nice pictures.

its rare to find pictures that clear and sharp. good find


star from me



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 02:56 PM
link   
reply to post by Turbohale
 


How do you know what an alien fleet looks like? And to me it still looks like jets. But they're ufo's until identfied.



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:03 PM
link   
Look's like a reflection if you look at the wingtip you can see how it may be possible.

The reason is i see another reflection the exact same pattern actually on the wingtip if you look very very close you will see it aswell.

Firstly look at the wingtip then you will see a white line like the other's going into the end of the S now follow this down to the C and you will see a brighter ball of light at the end.

Just like the other reflection's.

Now unless these UFO are really small with really small vapour trail's i think this make's me personally beleive this is just reflection nothing more nothing less.

Regard's
Lee


[edit on 25-11-2007 by h3akalee]



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Alright everyone, I think I may have debunked these pics...look at this first pic. There is a reflection of what looks like a partial image (of what is in the sky), on the tail.





Now look closely at the tail in this pic....the reflection line comes off the tail...interesting huh? What do you all think?




posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:10 PM
link   
You are asking what they are but yet you create a headline for this thread as if you know what they are? Why would you say "Alien fleet" if you don't even know what that is in the picture?



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:12 PM
link   
reply to post by wrangell76
 


I beat you by 6 minute's muhahaha.

Regard's
Lee




posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by h3akalee
 


Well spotted


Reflection of internal lights perhaps? In any case, I think you've solved it



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:13 PM
link   
Looks like debris falling from space, or some "space trash".

Thanks for sharing!

[edit on 25-11-2007 by TheoOne]



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:18 PM
link   
Another pic of the tail closeup...I hope this one shows up well...if you zoom in you can clearly see the line coming off the tip of the tail...




posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:21 PM
link   
reply to post by h3akalee
 


Yeah, but at least I had the pics...HA HA!



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:23 PM
link   
reply to post by wrangell76
 


You stole my idea and added the pic's now remove your post otherwise i will ring my lawyer.

Regard's
Lee





posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:25 PM
link   
Darn
I got to look closer at images from now on. Good eyes lee and Wrangell
I did say reflection in my first post though, but still good eye's for seeing it on the wing tip.

[edit on 11/25/2007 by Solarskye]



posted on Nov, 25 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   
reply to post by h3akalee
 



LOL!
I do have a good lawyer myself...LOL
And his name is EXIF!!


IPTC

  • Record Version = 2
  • Keywords = Arizona trip 2007

    IPTC Core (Adobe XMP)















    Adobe Photoshop Elements for Windows, version 2.0




    adobe: Docid:photoshop:6fdff000-9938-11dc-944a-d83e3bf0a7bd





    Arizona trip 2007







    Arizona trip 2007







    Exif IFD0

  • Camera Make = Hewlett-Packard
  • Camera Model = Photosmart M525
  • Picture Orientation = normal (1)
  • X-Resolution = 72/1 = 72.00
  • Y-Resolution = 72/1 = 72.00
  • X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
  • Software/Firmware Version = Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0
  • Last Modified Date/Time = 2007:11:22 13:15:23
  • Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) = co-sited / datum point (2)
  • Reference Value of Black/White Point = 0/1,255/1,128/1,255/1,128/1,255/1
    Exif Sub IFD

  • Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 617/1000000 second = 0.00062 second
  • Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 470/100 = F4.70
  • Exposure Program = normal program (2)
  • ISO Speed Ratings = 100
  • Exif Version = 0220
  • Original Date/Time = 2007:10:10 10:12:17
  • Digitization Date/Time = 2007:10:10 10:12:17
  • Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
  • Compressed Bits per Pixel = 320/100 = 3.20
  • Shutter Speed Value (APEX) = 1066/100
    Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/1618.00 second
  • Aperture Value (APEX) = 446/100
    Aperture = F4.69
  • Brightness (APEX) = 9993/1000
    Brightness = 1019.04 foot-lambert
  • Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/10 = 0.00
  • Max Aperture Value (APEX) = 297/100 = 2.97
    Max Aperture = F2.80
  • Metering Mode = center weighted average (2)
  • Light Source / White Balance = daylight (1)
  • Flash = Flash did not fire, auto mode
  • Focal Length = 600/100 mm = 6.00 mm
    # FlashPix Version = 0100
    # Colour Space = sRGB (1)
    # Image Width = 756 pixels
    # Image Height = 575 pixels
    # Exposure Index = 100/1
    # Image Sensing Method = one-chip color area sensor (2)
    # Image Source = digital still camera (DSC)
    # Scene Type = directly photographed image
    # Custom Rendered = normal process (0)
    # Exposure Mode = auto exposure (0)
    # White Balance = auto (0)
    # Digital Zoom Ratio = 0/10 = 0.00
    # Focal Length in 35mm Film = 36
    # Scene Capture Type = standard (0)
    # Gain Control = n/a (0)
    # Contrast = normal (0)
    # Saturation = normal (0)
    # Sharpness = normal (0)
    # Subject Distance Range = unknown (0)

  • Wowee! Look at all those Adobe tags! I think we have officially debunked this one...


    [edit on 25-11-2007 by wrangell76]



    new topics

    top topics



     
    5
    <<   2  3  4 >>

    log in

    join