It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Alien fleet/formation in high altitude pic

page: 3
5
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 01:46 AM
link   
reply to post by mbkennel
 



If you scroll up and check the links I posted showing photos of the Interiors of this particular aircraft, you are more than welcome to try to locate the item(s) that produced the image in the window.

I myself have looked and could not readily see anything at that angle and luminosity that would create such an image. Perhaps you, or others, can.

Good luck




posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 02:05 AM
link   
Taking a photo out of a window of a plane is no good evidence, the wing reflection destroy's any credability of this. Since the object is in front of the wing that destroy's it even more. It is obviously a background reflection of the inside of the cabin ceiling, or a photoshop post processing trick.

[edit on 11/26/2007 by Brainiac]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 02:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Essan
Reflection of internal lights perhaps? In any case, I think you've solved it

Yes. The double image (two contrails, etc.) is probably due to the double layer of glazing in the cabin window.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 02:12 AM
link   
Let's look at it this way: Even if those were 4 Alien spacecrafts headed down to Earth... the picture as a whole STILL isn't good enough to prove anything.

So what are we really looking at here? We're probably looking at some sort of reflection, and if we aren't, then maybe we're looking at some objects falling down near the plane's wing. So if they are objects falling down towards the plane's wing, then what are they? We do not have a ZOOM good enough to see what they are, so what else is there to say?

This picture is inconclusive regardless of what the anomaly is...



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 03:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Diplomat
 


Nice find.

Ill let you in on a secret, Alien craft Do not fly in visable formations with in a planets atmosphere.

Alien formation's and facts.
It has something to do with the fact that

a)Human Tech cannot damage the ships, There go tactical formations are not needed.

b) because if any engagement was to play place, millions of ships would decent on top of them, or the weapons of a warship.

C) ships are never seen in more then 2 or 3 at a time, Unless there is some sort of communication going on, And example of this, is that they are trying to contact someone, or something to that effect. Often, there will be one, with a second cloaked near by.

[edit on 26-11-2007 by Uhmari]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 03:14 AM
link   

Originally posted by Uhmari
ships are never seen in more then 2 or 3 at a time, Unless there is some sort of communication going on, And example of this, is that they are trying to contact someone, or something to that effect. Often, there will be one, with a second cloaked near by.

[edit on 26-11-2007 by Uhmari]


Thanks for your reply, but I honestly think you are full of you know what. Where are your sources for such incredible information? You seem to know all about Alien crafts. Please enlighten us...



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 04:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by Uhmari

Nice find.

Ill let you in on a secret, Alien craft Do not fly in visable formations with in a planets atmosphere.


From the Big Book of UFO Secrets for Dummies?

I must order my copy !



That statement puts a lot of alleged sightings right into the haox/misinfo category right there. I've heard of many reports of 'formations' visible in the atmosphere.


Alien formation's and facts.
It has something to do with the fact that

a)Human Tech cannot damage the ships, There go tactical formations are not needed.


I'm not disagreeing with you, but I'd love to know how this fact has been verified, or infact how it is infact, a fact?


b) because if any engagement was to play place, millions of ships would decent on top of them, or the weapons of a warship.


Can you tell us the source of this information? You seem pretty sure of your claims. I wish I were so confident to make such claims.


C) ships are never seen in more then 2 or 3 at a time, Unless there is some sort of communication going on, And example of this, is that they are trying to contact someone, or something to that effect. Often, there will be one, with a second cloaked near by.




How do you know this.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 05:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Uhmari

I’ll let you in on a secret, Alien craft Do not fly in visable formations with in a planets atmosphere.

a)Human Tech cannot damage the ships, There go tactical formations are not needed.

b) because if any engagement was to play place, millions of ships would decent on top of them, or the weapons of a warship.

C) ships are never seen in more then 2 or 3 at a time, Unless there is some sort of communication going on, And example of this, is that they are trying to contact someone, or something to that effect. Often, there will be one, with a second cloaked near by.


Oh? And how do you know all this? Where did you get all this info from? Are you the Chief Operations Officer of the 3rd Solar Planetary Alien Space Fleet?



[edit on 26-11-2007 by mikesingh]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 05:52 AM
link   
My main question is whether the objects in the picture were the focus of the photograph and the reason the photo was taken. Why is the area forward of the wing the center of the picture and not the objects and if it was from a digital camera (assumed from the quality of the picture) were other, zoomed in pictures taken? The background of the scenario that these pics were would be helpful. I can understand that these objects might have been moving at a rate that a single photo (this one) be all that was able to be taken.

Right off the back I will say the the contrails alone are a give away that this is not the stereotypical 'ufo' (gravity distorting vehicle) people want to see. The contrails are an sign of atmospheric interaction and show that the crafts (if actually there) are of a variety that flies in a fashion of a convention aircraft.

The best hopes for these vehicles, if real, is an 'aurora' type craft that can leave the atmosphere but take off and land like a conventional aircraft. I think that there are four crafts in this picture (again, if real) flying in formation that could possibly be that of a bomb squadron.

These again are just an observation of a picture I saw on the internet. I can't swing either way.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 06:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Spoodily

Right off the back I will say the the contrails alone are a give away that this is not the stereotypical 'ufo' (gravity distorting vehicle) people want to see. The contrails are an sign of atmospheric interaction and show that the crafts (if actually there) are of a variety that flies in a fashion of a convention aircraft.


Spot on! A contrail is formed when the ambient air mixes with the hot, humid exhaust because of turbulence generated by the exhaust flow. If that mixture happens to be saturated or supersaturated with moisture, a contrail will form.

Now where UFOs of the alien kind are concerned, in all probability they operate with a concept known as 'gravity shielding' and 'anti gravity' which has nothing to do with conventional jet propulsion. What is seen in the pic is therefore nothing but contrails from jet aircraft flying in formation.

Cheers!



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 06:23 AM
link   
reply to post by mikesingh
 


www.abovetopsecret.com...

Have you read this thread? I've personally seen what I would call the 'real deal' while I was delivering pizzas back in 2002. If there is a contrail, it must a plane in some context. That means it must land somewhere on Earth and is meant for close range operations.

The 'real deal' goes so fast it lands anywhere it wants. Once I had my sighting the idea of moon bases became alot more believable to me.

These objects in the photo (if real) could be a type of plane that uses the ability to go into upper/outer atmposphere to position themselves quickly over targets that are a distance away without being noticed. Just a suggestion...



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Spoodily
 


Ok. Check this out. Thought you might be interested....

www.drboylan.com...

Cheers!



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 08:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Uhmari
b) because if any engagement was to play place, millions of ships would decent on top of them, or the weapons of a warship.


This supports the near gridlock theory. With millions of ships, not including the millions of ships from the other races, the area surrounding Earth is only a dozen craft away from gridlock.

May be that's why it takes the shuttle 44 hours to dock at ISS. They shuttle has to dodge thousands of ships on the way there. Could it be that the newest satellites going up are actually parking meters?

[edit on 11/26/2007 by roadgravel]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Uhmari
reply to post by Diplomat
 



C) ships are never seen in more then 2 or 3 at a time, Unless there is some sort of communication going on, And example of this, is that they are trying to contact someone, or something to that effect. Often, there will be one, with a second cloaked near by.

[edit on 26-11-2007 by Uhmari]



So when thousands of people in Mexico city see thousands of objects and film them all at the same time they are communicating? because your statement isnt really true if what is witnessed in south american countries is anything to go by..
IMO



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 10:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by Solarskye
I see contrails with two of them so those are most likely jets. Don't know what the other two are unless it's a reflection from the two with contrails somehow? Nice photo by the way Turbohale.
Or was that taken by someone else? Anyway still nice pic.


[edit on 11/25/2007 by Solarskye]


I am in agreement with you on this. The contrails are a dead give away as is the standard flight formation. These are definitely jets and a trick of light photography.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by wrangell76
Now look closely at the tail in this pic....the reflection line comes off the tail...interesting huh? What do you all think?

I think you are 100% right.

This is it. The illuminated leading edge of the wingtip is reflected a few times in the multiple layers of glass and plastic in the window. It is the exact same lenght. The exact same angle. And there is a brighter spot on the bottom. End of story, end of thread.

All the others who are speculating after reading your post are really thick.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by h3akalee
Look's like a reflection if you look at the wingtip you can see how it may be possible.

The reason is i see another reflection the exact same pattern actually on the wingtip if you look very very close you will see it aswell.

Firstly look at the wingtip then you will see a white line like the other's going into the end of the S now follow this down to the C and you will see a brighter ball of light at the end.

Just like the other reflection's.

Now unless these UFO are really small with really small vapour trail's i think this make's me personally beleive this is just reflection nothing more nothing less.

Regard's
Lee


[edit on 25-11-2007 by h3akalee]


After looking at it again i think you've hit the nail on the head.

And if you read the submitters description he says he never saw the 'objects' until he started uploading his pictures which would explain reflection theory.

[edit on 26/11/07 by Liamoville]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Extralien
 


"My initial theory was of something inside the craft that was causing the reflection in th window... Unless anyone else can locate the possible source from inside, then I forward this theory...

The Wings 'tail' tip has a reflective flare of the sun on its leading edge. This, in turn is being reflected onto the wing itself and also onto the outer pane of aircrafts window.

That reflection on the outer window is then reflected onto the crafts inner plastic window nearest the passenger which, in turn, sends a double reflection onto the inside of the outer pane of crafts glass, hence the double image in the sky, but only a single reflected image on wings tail tip.

a bit like the effect you get when placing two mirrors face to face.

The reflected images appear to be almost exactly the same length and distance (top to tail) as the leading edge sun glare." ,By Extralien-

Ding, ding, dign. We have a winnah. (although I'm not sure whether the reflection on the wingtip is bouncing off the wing, I can't see it, I believe it's going directly from wing-tip to window). no matter, same theroy applies.

As far as the anomoly originating from inside the cabin, I don't think that's possible. There's a clear single reflection on the wintip(with contrail), and nothing inside the cabin could cause contrails.

Star for you, and Lee, and the poster who posted the pics with the refelections circled. Good job all.







[edit on 26-11-2007 by Nola213]



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Follow the white rabbit.
Knock knock Neo ...
Adobe tags = fake photo


I would not jump to conclusions that quickly.

Just because there are Adobe tags, does not mean it is a fake.

Photoshop or Elements can be used to alter the image size and resaved. This was more than likely done so it could be uploaded online.

The original is what we would want to see. Most modern digital cameras have high res settings which create large file sizes.

I'd like to see the original uploaded.



posted on Nov, 26 2007 @ 01:10 PM
link   
The trails and bright objects are water droplets more than likely between the doubled layered glass. Next time you take a flight check it out.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join