It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pepsi78
Maybe because his own filosophy was identical with masonry and there was nothing new to learn?
Reformed in to what?
how can a member come in to a lodge that is not even reconised by all masonic bodies and try to reform the institution?
There is no logic in what you are saying.
Here is what you are saing, this is what I'm reading.
He went 3 times and because he saw he can't reform masonry he left it.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Crowley was a Mason, but a clandestine one. If we say that Crowley was *not* a Mason, that would be the same thing as saying that Prince Hall Masons were not really Masons until the UGLE recognized them.
Obviously, PH Masons *were* already Masons, otherwise they could have not been recognized as such, but instead would have had to have been re-initiated.
Same thing for Crowley's Lodge, which is now a recognized Lodge. Aleister Crowley was a Mason in the same sense that Nat King Cole, Duke Ellington, Count Basie, and Thurgood Marshall were Masons. They were all regularly initiated, passed, and raised, but their Lodges were not at the time recognized by the UGLE.
Originally posted by masonica_esoterica
ML not to be disrespectful, but you took the same oaths as I did.Ones where you state that you will not make or be a part of the making of a clandestine Mason.
A clandestine mason is not a mason,therefore a clandestine degree bestowed upon one does not a mason make.
He tried to recruit Masons to the OTO though and offered a discount to masons that joined if I remember correctly,which in my opinion reaffirms that he was joining his (fake clandestine) lodge for mercenary reasons, IE, he could care less about Freemasonry, it was only a vehicle for him to gain new potential OTO recruits under the guise of having the "real secrets".
Furthermore the way Crowley led his personal life is an affront to all things Masonic.
I would hardly call Crowley a man of high moral rectitude,unless you consider shooting heroin and screwing anything with a hole, in any hole virtuous.
Don't even get me started on his writings on sacrifice and blood.
Look at the Thelemic "cakes of light" ritual wafers thats ingredients were semen and menstural blood.
Originally posted by mmmeat
Which is completely different than what Crowley did; he joined an irregular, clandestine, unrecognized Lodge. Therefore, Crowley was not a Mason.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by mmmeat
Which is completely different than what Crowley did; he joined an irregular, clandestine, unrecognized Lodge. Therefore, Crowley was not a Mason.
It was exactly the same. Duke Ellington joined a clandestine Lodge, and when Duke died it was still clandestine. Today, the Lodge is recognized by the Grand Lodge of NY.
Aleister Crowley joined a clandestine Lodge, and when Aleister died it was still clandestine. Today, Aleister's Lodge is recognized by the UGLE and all 51 US Grand Lodges.
Originally posted by Masonic Light
You seem to think that a Lodge has to be originally regularly chartered in order for it to be legitimate.
(1) He joined a non-recognized Lodge.
(2) He dropped off the rolls shortly thereafter.
(3) He isn't listed as a member of the (irregular) Grand Loge de France
Originally posted by tetsujin420
Wen don't have ancient secrets. The secrecy is half the fun IMO, and it could be called a trust thing. Its not hard to become a Mason, ask on to be one.
[edit on 12-11-2007 by tetsujin420]
Originally posted by sparda4355
I am truly interested in this! and I know people who were lower lever masons
Originally posted by sparda4355
however it is common belief that at some point in order to become a higher level mason you must sacrifice a human! This binds you to your secrecy and is why you don't have a lot of high level masons coming clean!
Originally posted by sparda4355
Although this would make sense in order to keep people quite, just as easily it could be the "secrecy" that causes rumors to be created! I am not saying that I believe these rumors, but it honestly could go either way!
Originally posted by sparda4355
It would be easy for a mason to make a non mason seem like a fool for believing this (which is why it is such a good idea to begin with) and at the same time, it is easy to see how this could simply be made up by somebody because there is really NO WAY to disprove it!
Originally posted by sparda4355
Honestly I have no idea! and even if it was true, I don't necessary think you would know about it nor would you tell me if you did... lol
Originally posted by sparda4355
I am truly interested in this! and I know people who were lower lever masons, however it is common belief that at some point in order to become a higher level mason you must sacrifice a human! This binds you to your secrecy and is why you don't have a lot of high level masons coming clean!
Originally posted by mmmeat
(1) He joined a non-recognized Lodge.
(2) He dropped off the rolls shortly thereafter.
(3) He isn't listed as a member of the (irregular) Grand Loge de France.
It's pretty simple, really.
Originally posted by sparda4355
...however it is common belief that at some point in order to become a higher level mason you must sacrifice a human! This binds you to your secrecy and is why you don't have a lot of high level masons coming clean!
Originally posted by sparda4355
I am truly interested in this! and I know people who were lower lever masons,
however it is common belief that at some point in order to become a higher level mason you must sacrifice a human!
This binds you to your secrecy
and is why you don't have a lot of high level masons coming clean!
Although this would make sense in order to keep people quite, just as easily it could be the "secrecy" that causes rumors to be created! I am not saying that I believe these rumors, but it honestly could go either way!
It would be easy for a mason to make a non mason seem like a fool for believing this
(which is why it is such a good idea to begin with)
and at the same time, it is easy to see how this could simply be made up by somebody because there is really NO WAY to disprove it!
Honestly I have no idea! and even if it was true, I don't necessary think you would know about it nor would you tell me if you did... lol
Originally posted by wu kung
Originally posted by sparda4355
...however it is common belief that at some point in order to become a higher level mason you must sacrifice a human! This binds you to your secrecy and is why you don't have a lot of high level masons coming clean!
Oh boy, here we go again.
I'm so tired of this.
Okay, how about this...
From now on, if anyone is going to post something that they heard about Masonry, please read EVERY SINGLE other post by EVERY ONE else who's ever posted on the subject.
Seriously, people just go on perpetuating these ridiculous stories and I for one am tired of having to deal with it.
Go to my thread (www.abovetopsecret.com...) with any real inquiries.
Originally posted by mmmeat
If I go to that thread, will I have to sacrifice a human?
Just curious, because I one had an uncle who had a friend that knew somebody down the street who owned a motorcycle that was test driven at a dealership where a mechanic worked who knew this girl with a butterfly tattoo whose Dad once dated a striper who once danced for this underaged fella who had a buddy who knew this bus driver who was a Mason, and HE said I'd have to sacrifice a human if I wanted to.
But I don't know for sure, because I just read it offin' a website that knows all the secrets of Masonry. You guys haven't ever seen sites like these before! It totally opened my eyes!
Freemasonrywatch
The Forbidden Knowledge
Your pal,
Meat.