It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wig
Your simple mind does not see my points
Originally posted by Wig
1. If they could not forsee it, how can they expect their employer to forsee it?
Originally posted by Wig
2.The point is not everyone can forsee sexual abuse at a gay pride parade - You just agreed to that. No-one could forsee that without a fully functional crystal ball. Which is why your example does not even come close.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Keep it cool, Wig. Let's not start with the barbs, OK?
Also, the "reasonable person" test applies. What would a reasonable person know, or be expected to know, about the situation.
Once again: there is no requirement to foresee any action. But past experience with this parade had resulted in objectionable behavior, so there was precedent. The supervisors should have known that sexual harassment was a possibility.
The supervisors should have known that sexual harassment was a possibility.
Originally posted by jsobecky
This is what happens when someone jumps into a debate without knowing anything at all about the case.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Not so. If I allow a 3 year old child to ride an ATV without a helmet, and he gets hurt, simply saying "I didn't know he would get hurt" isn't a valid defense.
Originally posted by jsobecky
The supervisors should have known that sexual harassment was a possibility.
Originally posted by Wig
In anycase it is for the court to decide, I think they will lose, you think they might win, I would like to know the final outcome, but I don't suppose I will ever findout. Arguing any further here on what the court will or will not decide is not going to interest me any further, so I'll say goodbye, or see you later.
Originally posted by Regenmacher
You mean this is what happens when you dine on too many IHateU TV dinners and then post replies. So lots of luck chuckles...shallow debates are readily transparent, so go fool yourself.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Well, check in here from time to time, and if there's an update I'll post it for you to read.
Adios.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Be a man and get out there and DO YOUR JOB. And stop being a baby and ??? questioning your sexuality.
Originally posted by dgtempe
If i saw a bunch of firefighters at a Gay Parade, i wouldnt think the firefighters were Gay. This is my morning Editorial.
Originally posted by jsobecky
Sexual harassment. The antagonists just happen to be gay.
Originally posted by jsobecky
And it's not about homophobia.
Originally posted by jsobecky
You guys still don't get it. It's a case of sexual harassment. The antagonists just happen to be gay.
What I mean is that the sexual instinct is one of the strongest. Society has never accepted homosexuality 100%, and it never will, simply because of the strength of that instinct.
It will be tolerated to varying levels of degrees, but never accepted.
Pederasty has also been accepted by some societies, but never by all societies. I feel comfortable making the same prediction about it.