It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Siddharta
Sean, you are either part of the hoax, or you are the worst researcher in this case, having such experience and still doubting every other expert, who says, it is a hoax.
I only know one, who has the capabilities and is on the believer's side: NicLev.
As I understand you, you are still undecisive after more than a year... That is your expertise, as you present it.
Originally posted by spf33
correct. depends on the day though. some days 50\50, some days 51/50, some days 50/51.
Originally posted by spf33maybe you should stop and think for a moment that my expertise is what allows me to see the alternate possibilities far more than the average person?
Originally posted by Sys_Config
One thing for sure, after looking at your photo and flowers , is that what all trainees do, same perspectives and flowers?,
Just t don't quit your day job for photography, stick to cgi and animation and ad art .
You stuck to it here for a year, because thats what it is and you feel comfortable with that.
Thats what Diebny did, however he has more experitse than you, and helped author photoshop, and that still weighs more, than what you say here, and I think that is what agravates you more.
how in your right mind could fault Diebny and the others for doing what could only logically be done, skip a report on worthless photos, and EYEBALL it
Originally posted by Siddharta
The latter is, what I am missing in all your attacks against CGI experts and - as you seem to do, since you are the guy with those nice pictures - the words of the "witnesses".
I also had the impression, that you always used models, which were initially created by others. Correct me, if I am wrong.Why would that be?
Originally posted by spf33
anyone want to talk about the legality of forging us government and military documents, making them available online and claiming they are real re:isaac's docs?
are we not 3 letter alphabet investigational territory?
anyone want to talk about how i am being publicly accused on abovetopesecret.com of breaking a potential federal law?
[edit on 25-6-2008 by spf33]
Originally posted by Siddharta
I have some respect for you - if hoaxer or not (but in the moment your defence seems rather bad) but this stupid "law" crap really is not necessary.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
You claim you saw one as a child would you care to share that experience, and is that experience the basis for your bias.
Originally posted by spf33
Originally posted by Siddharta
I have some respect for you - if hoaxer or not (but in the moment your defence seems rather bad) but this stupid "law" crap really is not necessary.
why?
i'm composing a letter to the fbi and the department of homeland security right now, thanks.
Originally posted by Sys_Config
Thats why one of the links in that Young site specializes in government documents and certificates...You know darn well, based on my previous posts you can even purchase watermarked look alike papers.
Your whole business is based on fantasy and art and creating buzz.