reply to post by Double_Nought_Spy
Very interesting points raised from both!
Indeed these ideas are compelling about forming arguments that could claim that intelligence both domestics and foreigns could have benefits from such strategies, for example IMO one of them being increased accuracy in future predictions of information flows. Ideas for implementation of said form of strategies could originate in studies about finding ways to minimize damage control if future secret projects are risking some detail of exposure to the public from maybe unwanted occurrences like accidents.
What accidents could happen and what technologies would be risking exposure that they could not be tested in controlled environments and under strict secrecy?
At this part of my post I want to thank Dr.Dill for his very nice ufology blog I read, two different entries in it regarding the death of Arthur Clarke and some thoughts about some sightings of triangle craft and the Aurora project concerning the "pulse detonation" hoop marks appearing in photos made me think what Arthur Clarke would also add in his fabulous documentary I consider still the best UFO documentary ever, if he came across notions or claims about alleged secret projects crafts behaving strangely displaying some of UFO properties that UFO witnesses have been claiming.
If projects like these exist, they would want to mimic proposed UFO potential capabilities of flying between space and time. Since early reports from before the turn of the former century, individuals were seeing UFO shapes that strangely resembled craft that had not been invented yet by mankind but their concept and appearance was soon to follow. Even the most famous Kenneth Arnold case IMO notions out to the later discovery of the stealth technology/stealth aircraft/bombers a few decades later. Strangely if we consider such hypothesis it seems like the military establishment especially in the field of aircraft research might be appearing being led by the nose to certain implementations of designs IMO unknown by whom and for what underlying motives.
Now if we give the idea of UFOs flying through lay lines some thought, for this action to be of a procedure of requirement for some kind of low energy consumption drive technology, for achieving and maintaining space travel, and since lay lines especially at places that form strong energetic vortexes most of times are in non restricted and plainly public areas, although as the theory of the UFO appearance criteria in the UFO Hunters show state: military presence could be always near by, for some reasons unknown to us.
If for some reason that said secret projects exist and whatever establishment decides the research is entering a new level and more open experiments are required to be introduced, then yes, their projects could risk exposure if something goes wrong.
Are we seeing earthly craft alongside with normal UFO activity displaying "subspace"* flight abilities? Who knows!
Do Isaac's drones, an UFO activity that as Double Naught Spy and Sys_Config say it really appears only on the internet and nowhere else in reality, an activity displaying much different characteristics than the norm of the UFO encounters, therefore much easier to be discerned from being mixed and confused with plain UFO activity, therefore could be cataloged differently from UFO cases from anyone concerned, is a test of creating "maps" of information pathways for requirements of future damage control if any such need should arise?
Peace!
[edit on 1-5-2008 by spacebot]
