Nibirus approach Clear Image, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 28-6-2007 @ 01:53 PM by TheSonOfMan
Originally posted by biggie smalls


Niburu's tail. It is essentially a giant red comet. Picture a Jupiter (I don't know its exact size) sized planet with about 20 moons following it and trailing red dust. I am not sure if this is its atmosphere or particles that are left behind as it travels.

There was a link on this forum I believe showing a red trail in our galaxy of dark matter. I don't know if this is significant, but here it is:

astsun.astro.virginia.edu...

Picture this, but instead of the whole galaxy just our neighborhood between Sol and the close brown dwarf which name escapes me at the moment.

I believe Niburu follows a great elipitical orbit of about 3600 years between our star and another (our sun's twin- a brown dwarf).

bs



In my opinion the red moon is not caused by Planet X at all, but it will actaully come from an Atomic or Nuclear bomb being dropped in Israel.

This is what jesus refered to as the Abomination of Desolation "standing" in the Holy Place (israel)


[edit on 28-6-2007 by TheSonOfMan]

[edit on 28-6-2007 by TheSonOfMan]


reply posted on 28-6-2007 @ 04:02 PM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by biggie smalls

There was a link on this forum I believe showing a red trail in our galaxy of dark matter. I don't know if this is significant, but here it is:

astsun.astro.virginia.edu...



That's not Dark Matter. That's a computer model of the Sagittarius Dwarf Eleptical Galaxy (SagDEG) that has been merging with our milkyway galaxy for the past millions of years, and will continue to merge with the milky way for many more million years. Some scientists think that SagDEG may contain dark matter because it seems to be holding together better than current computer models would suggest. But that video is not about a "red trail of dark matter" -- it's about the galactic union between SagDEG (shown in red and yellow) and the Milky Way (shown in blue and white).

As I stated, This merger has been taking place for Hundreds of Millions of years, and will continue for another 100,000,000 years -- I don't see how you can relate this eons-old merger with the possibility of a "Planet X" moving into Earth's neighborhood, nor how this is supposedly making our skies red. I don't get the connection.

Edit: Spelling and grammer

[edit on 28-6-2007 by Soylent Green Is People]



reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 04:33 AM by Essan
Originally posted by StellarX

spider.ipac.caltech.edu...


It was never resolved what - if anything - this was. Although given the huge number of dwarf planets since discovered beyond Neptune - including Eris which is larger than Pluto - one might reasonably conclude either it was an early spotting of one such planet (remember the size was only estimated, and the equipment used was pretty proimitive compared to modern telescopes), or, there may be a larger body out there which we have yet to 're-find'. Either way, it's not an inhabited planet on an improbable eliptical orbit and it's not anywhere within the orbit of Neptune. Unless it's one of them invisible planets ......




[edit on 29-6-2007 by Essan]


reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 09:22 AM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by Mogget
spider.ipac.caltech.edu...


Mogget -- I remember reading this "rubuttal" once, but I couldn't find it...Thanks for posting.

and Essan hit the nail right on the head about "cover up". I don't know how many times a good debate has been ruined by one side claiming "oh...it must be a cover-up". If one is a blind believer in Niribu, or ET visitation for that matter, and they are prestented with facts disputing their beliefs, then it's sooo easy for them to say:

"you're debunking doesn't hold water, because your source is NASA (or whomever) -- and they can't be trusted"

or

"It doesn't matter how good you're argument is because you're just a well paid government dis-information agent whose job it is to make good arguments debunking real ET UFO events."


How does someone who wants the ignorance of some of these "blind believers" to be denied compete with the blanket statement "You're just a disinformation agent, so your argument (no matter how scientifically sound) is worthless"? There is no way to defend yourself in a debate when these unfair tactics are used.

and for the record...I am open minded about the possibilty of ET visitation or large bodies beyond Neptune. But I have yet to see any proof of real ET visitation....Or any proof that one of these heavenly bodies is full of reptilians (or whatever), and is headed our way after 3600 years.


reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 01:22 PM by StellarX
Originally posted by Essan
It was never resolved what - if anything - this was.


It seems that it was resolved and i want to thank that contributor for chasing down the rumour i never had the interest to...

Although given the huge number of dwarf planets since discovered beyond Neptune - including Eris which is larger than Pluto - one might reasonably conclude either it was an early spotting of one such planet (remember the size was only estimated, and the equipment used was pretty proimitive compared to modern telescopes), or, there may be a larger body out there which we have yet to 're-find'.


It's interesting how reason should, according to some, always be applied to arrive at the most mundane and establishment serving conclusions possible. Do you have a opinion on why this is so and how 'useful' ( or to be honest not at all) the historic record has proven this notion to be?

Either way, it's not an inhabited planet on an improbable eliptical


According to the other sources that seems to be accurate...

orbit and it's not anywhere within the orbit of Neptune.


Such astuteness( yes, it's a word)! You scientific people are such a smart bunch....

Unless it's one of them invisible planets ......


I reckon that if geologist can deny continental drift for almost sixty years planetary scientist might very well 'overlook' a planet that would require trash bins for a large number of their prized theories. It's just surprising how unobservant, in it's mildest form, people become when the observations stops corresponding with what they have chosen to see. I don't really care about Nibiru ( or whatever they are calling it these days) unless it's real, and coming this way, but since i am not sure if NASA can hide entire planets i will not be losing any sleep just yet.

Stellar


reply posted on 29-6-2007 @ 08:37 PM by carnival_of_souls2047
Originally posted by sostyles
link

Do you think that if Nasa knows its nibiru they would let us all know...... seriously! Especially since the sumerian tablets tell us that that is the planet of the gods, home to the Annunaki.
This would cause mass histeria not to mention unrest in the serious religions.


I concur with sostyles wholeheartedly. Even if the military industrial complex knew that this transneptunian body was Nibiru you'd have to be kidding yourself if you think they would let you in on the biggest find in the history of mankind. In their opinion, telling the public would serve no purpose. To me, this could be the biggest conspiracy of ALL TIME.

[edit on 29-6-2007 by carnival_of_souls2047]


reply posted on 30-6-2007 @ 01:22 AM by biggie smalls
As I don't really feel its necessary to waste bandwidth or space on the 3 amigo's server I will direct your attention to a few posts I made in another thread about the pole shift and Nibiru/Niburu.

www.abovetopsecret.com... (scroll down to the bottom)

I still have to find more sources relating to the existence of the planet, its tough finding real sources when the media is owned...The truth will only be shown on noname sites and even then people are often discredited by "scientists" (not saying they're doing it on purpose always, but often misinformed merely trying to help others out sadly).


SonofMan, here is what I was talking about in regards to the red dust:



[edit on 30-6-2007 by biggie smalls]


reply posted on 30-6-2007 @ 03:38 AM by biggie smalls
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
Is this Nibirus stuff I am seeing another Heavens Gate deal? What is with all the talk about flying away on a planet?


No its another hale bopp episode and I'm about to drink the cool aid.


Unless you think some alien invasion force is on it and gonna jump off and get us when we aint looking. Could you give me one good reason that NASA would hide a planet? They have always told us about their discoveries in the past concerning planet discoveries.


Yeah I'm so terrified of aliens invading that as we speak I have my tinfoil hat on. I don't want them to read my mind! HELP!

Please, NASA is part of the US government. When's the last time our government lied to us? Oh yeah, never. Sorry I forgot.


The earth will not be hit by this 10th planet if it exists, and this one will get ya. The Bible would have told us that if it were so.


I didn't mention anything about it colliding with the Earth. I don't know where you're getting your information from. It may come very close to us, but I don't think its going to hit us.

More likely cause a magnetic polar reversal.

The bible has every single piece of history written down? Next you're gonna tell me that God wrote it word for word and it was never edited to fit the need of the Romans or priests.

The bible just like everything else man has created is infallible. It doesn't have every little piece of history written in it whether you want to admit that or not.

[edit on 30-6-2007 by biggie smalls]


reply posted on 30-6-2007 @ 07:02 AM by Karilla
Um, Biggie? I'm afraid that there is a flaw in your thinking concerning this planet causing a magnetic field flip. Tis planet has undergone many field reversals in its history. As rock cools from a molten state the polarity of the Earth's magnetosphere is locked into it's structure, and geologists have been looking at a lot of rocks.

The fact is that the North pole is currently winding its circuitous path over the plant on its way to the next reversal. This will happen, sooner or later.

I rely rather heavily on the use of nautical charts. If you look at one (second image down on this link:
www.nmm.ac.uk...) you will see that, along the North cardinal line, is a series of figures (in this case 2 degrees, 15 minutes West, and the year 2001) that show the magnetic variation and when it was measured. The variation is the amount that the North pole (as readable on a compass) has deviated from "true" North (the orientation of the chart) for that area. In some parts of the US the variation is up to 11 degrees.

Updated charts will have a slightly different variation, because the North pole is moving constantly.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags