why would i want it to be secure? I wasn't hiding from them.
That wasn't my question. A cell-phone is NOT SECURE period. I am talking about the FBI. If you had these contacts with the FBI and had passed on
*IMPORTANT* information concerning *NATIONAL SECURITY* previous, then the FBI wouldn't have you calling them with information concerning *NATIONAL
SECURITY* on a cell. That is obvious and can not be denied.
They would have given you a *SECURE* line period/ end of story.
The real question in this and I am now even more convinced is.
What media outlet is Leslie working for?
About a week or so ago, I posted a response talking about my *GUT* feeling on Leslie. Just going over her story, her responses to people here, it
suddenly dawned on me.
Leslie, sounded like an actor. There is something in her response that doesn't sound authentic.
Well, it turns out a BBC producer who did a HIT piece against the 9/11 movement was interviewed on Alex Jones just a couple of days ago.
Near the end of the interview the BBC producer got into how 'myths' and 'conspiracy's' can get easily started on the internet and he suggests
that this is why the 9/11 truth movement is false, because it grew from *MYTHS* that got repeated and picked up on the Internet.
I knew something like this was being thought in the media, I posted that well before that interview happened.
I now believe Leslie is trying to get this 'conspiracy' to 'catch fire' on the internet.
So a program like the BBC or Dateline NBC can do a show and say 'look how easy it is to do'. Then they would show their plant working on the
computer chatting and starting some crazy rumour.
So they came up with some wild story and put it out there, like Bin Laden being captured in Brooklyn N.Y.
Its just like when Dateline NBC does those programs on perverts who get caught chatting with a 'plant' who gets a MYSPACE account.
Doesn't that sound familar?
The reason I think this is the case here, is because Leslie Powers and her story never added up, seemed a little strange for a hoax, however it is a
HOAX but with a twist.
Leslie's answers are *evasive* and non-sensical. Take for example the above quote from her, she must have known what I meant when I spoke of "Cell
Phones as Not secure".
It is obvious, but she tried to twist the meaning to say 'she is secure'.
The point is, she seems to avoid clear examples of the weakness of her story.
If this was involving NATIONAL SECURITY, I am sorry there is NO WAY that Leslie would be calling *TIPS* on a Cell-Phone after she had stopped OTHER
If you came to the FBI and was as good as the best informant with relevant info on National Security, they would give you a proper SECURE LINE TO
Also is her refusall to give a LOGICAL answer to any these questions. And her lack of a real story of why someone in New York is Bin Laden. There is
Another point worth repeating:
If she made these contacts at the FBI previous to Aug-12 why on earth is she calling the main number of the FBI in Houston on the morning of
There are no answers.
And that is why, when you connect the dots. Put it all together, her NON-Evidence, Her evasive answers.
I have concluded this is the MEDIA trying to pull a fast one on us, trying to start some stupid conspiracy rumour.
So they can in the future run a show on T.V and say ''Look how easy it is to start a conspiracy these days".
I ask anyone to visit her Blog, see the absolute lack of any connection to anything, see her responding to me on this thread, look at her quote above
and think about what I said.
[edit on 21-2-2007 by talisman]