posted on Jan, 30 2007 @ 03:22 PM
Hey its possible there is a 'floating tea pot' around the sun, but do you actually think it is probable?
What is the probability factor here?
The probability factor approached zero when she claimed 'contacts' at the FBI. For day's she is supposedly in communication with these
Then on the morning of Aug-12, what did she do? She calls the main number.
Then you have to face the fact, that in order for her story to be true, everyone else and I mean everyone else connected to this is LYING.
Occam's Razor, take the simpliest answer without making it more complicated holds true here.
Not only is everyone else except for herself LYING, people and organizations are not behaving in ways that most people here and elsewhere have
Throughout this thread, people have said that they dealt with the FBI and the way their behaving with Leslie is not even close to how they dealt with
Is it really believable that the FBI just rushed in? Based on a Sea-Horse on a site? Or a Known Alias?
Do you believe the FBI did this in such short notice, then had Al'Qaeda just fold up and die?
Do you believe that the FBI wouldn't think that "HEY ITS STRANGE HE IS HERE, MAYBE HE HAS THE BOMB"!
Do you believe that the FBI could find a way to silence everyone, that they would be sure, Al'Qaeda wouldn't speak, that Pakistani Intelligence
wouldn't speak, that their own members wouldn't speak.
Thats a lot of mouths the FBI silenced, how did they manage this?
Do you believe the FBI didn't worry about the POLICE STATION near-by if they intended all along to keep this one big secret?
Earlier I asked about based on what is Leslie claiming Bin Laden is guilty, since she doesn't believe anything in terms of video tapes, or messages
Now if the answer is...She came to this conclusion afterward, the same question still remains.
It doesn't answer the question. She still speaks of Him being caught, and glorifying the fact that New Yorkers did it on 'their own turf' as she
says in her blog.
It is obvious then, she still holds him guilty. But she doesn't believe anything about him in terms of video's etc, this is the product of very
So to summarize, the probability factor is at zero, Leslie talks about catching a guilty person, whom she can't even prove is guilty!
Why isn't she doubting her own evidence? If she has discovered all these lies about him, then how did she know that truly was an alias?
Then she would know nothing about him, then now she should feel guilty since she didn't catch a 'guilty' person. But she doesn't feel guilty does
If that isnt' self-defeating then I don't know what is.
[edit on 30-1-2007 by talisman]