Proof of Ancient Giants?, page 2

There is some proof "Giants" exsisted back then. But there not described as Gods in Egyptian or other literature of the time. This link may help.

Originally posted by usaforever
There is some proof "Giants" exsisted back then. But there not described as Gods in Egyptian or other literature of the time. This link may help.

Usaforever,

Thanks for the link to one of the "giants" of Egyptology, though his (Henri Edouard Naville's) methods were lamentable, we must remember that he was a product of his time and hence should not be judged by today's standards.

In the old days before archaeology became an established science, with a general methodology and standard procedures to follow, many such "fortune hunters" conducted searches for relics of the ancient past, in Egypt as well as in other countries. This was true in paleontology as well, by the way. No doubt much detail was lost from rich archaeological (and paleontological) sites due to the crude methods used and the lack of care for the minutiae at a site that such scientists today are so trained to consider.

In any case, it was an interesting profile of a person that helped increase our knowledge of the Egyptians. Though what it has to do with real "giants," I haven't a clue.

Harte

I found a site with plenty of unusual, large skeletons. Here it is.

Originally posted by Patrick_D
I found a site with plenty of unusual, large skeletons. Here it is.

Only because of poor research, I'm afraid. They keep stating "These types of skulls are bordering on biological impossibility" but they show no evidence that they know much about anatomy or the practice of binding limbs and bones to cause deformation.

This one is one we're all familiar with. :
www.tracone.com...

It's Peruvian, and they bound the heads of their children to shape them that way.

Another bound skull. Note that these aren't "giant skulls" as the site is claiming. They're the same size as your skull:
www.tracone.com...

This one's an example of trepanation... the individual actually survived having that much of the bony matter removed, as you can see from the growth on the edges of the hole. Again, it's a known specimen in a museum. You could go see it for yourself and see that it's a normal-sized skull. This one WAS bound, by the way. :
www.tracone.com...

Interesting skull, possibly hydrocephaly. Again, not gigantic. The skull appears to be that of someone who died about age 24. :
www.tracone.com...

The web page is getting tiresome with the same claims. Another bound skull, and a very famous one:
www.tracone.com...

Now they get sneaky. They show you the side view of the skull in #4. Now you can see that the deformation is caused by binding:
www.tracone.com...

Another one of the bound skulls from the same group:
www.tracone.com...

More bound skulls from the museum visit:
www.tracone.com...

Hydrocephaly, child, about 6 years old:
www.tracone.com...

This one is actually a sculpture and not a real skull. A closer look (larger photos are out there on the web) shows that the item is actually sculpted in one piece and is not a real skull (which would show the joints where the facial bones grew together) :
www.tracone.com...

And none of them are giants... sorry.

If you want to see real giant bones, ask the Smithsonian Intistute to open their vaults and show what they have been hiding there for years. But I doubt they will do it. It was one of the greatest American archaelogical cover-ups to hide skeletons of extraordinary size.

The Smithsonian's Board of Regents still refuses to open its meetings to the news media or the public. If Americans were ever allowed inside the 'nation's attic', as the Smithsonian has been called, what skeletons might they find?
From: Archaeological Coverups

Here are some pics of giants
If you are interested in learning more about giants
Steve Quale
and
Burlington News
have plenty of info an the subject.

well what can i say
I expect that life is wonderful and full of surprises for you
"wowow look the sun came up again"
or
"hey look things are growing in that ground over there"
basically buddy if you havent got the intelligence to work out when Childress is lying then you probably haven't got the intelligence to post at this forum anyway
so yeah
Bye
have a nice life
for those of you who do care that Childress regularly lies to his readership

However many people ignore this warning, and the story has a sinister aspect. The belief in this lost Egyptian/Tibetan temple has consequences today. Ever since unorthodox researcher David Hatcher Childress published the newspaper hoax as fact in his book Lost Cities of North and Central America, the story took on the trappings of truth, without regard for actual facts.

jcolavito.tripod.com...

The above individuals are claimed to represent a "new breed" of
scientific investigators. When their statements are subjected to
critical examination, however, it becomes evident that their ideas are
neither new nor scientific, as we shall see.
David Hatcher Childress, described as an "author researcher," claimed
that the geologic time scale had been compressed by cataclysmic events
so that what appears to have taken place over millions of years actually
occurred over the last several thousand years. Of course, this claim is
contradicted by the detailed historical records of the ancient Egyptians
and others, which go back 5000 years
Childress also claimed that dinosaurs are still alive today
www.xmission.com...

in this link read the section entitled
ANCIENT ATOM BOMBS
jcolavito.tripod.com...
It reveals the sources that Childress uses to acquire his information

I could post links l;ike this about Childress all day
but I'm sure the intelligent posters here already know hes a bigger fraud than Hancock
ce la vie

And for all of those who are interested in reading about how the Smithsonian Intitute covered up giant skeletons, I suggest to read
Holocaust of Giants: The Great Smithsonian Cover-up
Exerpt from Professor Vine Deloria personal communication

here is the link:
www.freerepublic.com...

Orthodox scientists have been lying for long about a number of things.

It is a well-known fact the Smithsonian did hide giant skeletons.
The archaelogical findings were listed by the Smithsonian Institute itself.
So what are they lying to themselves??? hehehe

12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to
the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891
(published in 1894)
(mounds at Dunleith, Illinois)

Mound Group, Dunleith, Illinois.
"Near the original surface, 10 or 12 feet from the
center, on the lower side, lying at full length on its
back, was one of the largest skeletons discovered by
the Bureau agents, the length as proved by actual
measurement being between 7 and 8 feet."

12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to
the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891
(published in 1894)
(Pike County, Illinois)

No. 11 is now 35 by 40 feet at the base and 4 feet
high. In the center, 3 feet below the surface, was a
vault 8 feet long and 3 feet wide. In the bottom of
this, among the decayed fragments of bark wrappings,
lay a skeleton fully seven feet long, extended at full
length on the back, head west. Lying in a circle above
the hips were fifty-two perforated shell disks about
an inch in diameter and one-eighth of an inch thick.

12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to
the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891
(published in 1894)
(Kanawha County, West Virginia)


Spring Hill Inclosure, Kanawha County, West Virginia.
In the bottom of Mound 11 (upper left) was found a
skeleton "fully seven feet long."

12th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology to
the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution 1890-1891
(published in 1894)
(Kanawha County, West Virginia)

A Section of the Great Smith Mound, Kanawha County,
West Virginia.
This cone-shaped mound rose 35 feet high and measured
175 feet in diameter at its base. The interior of the
mound contained a vault made of timber measuring 12
feet by 13 feet. It was positioned within the mound 20
feet above surface level.
Holocaust of Giants: The Great Smithsonian Cover-up

and so it goes on and on. It is a huge list... and the document is written by a recognized Professor.

I came across this article a few months ago not sure how real it is but check it out

An article from Strand magazine (December,1895) reprinted in Traces of the Elder Faiths of Ireland by W.G. Wood-Martin mentions this fossilized giant discovered during mining operations in County Antrim, Ireland:

Ancient Walled City, Older than Egypt\'s Pyramids, Unearthed off US Georgia Coast
  Posted 13 days ago with 102 member flags

Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 8 days ago with 96 member flags

12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags

The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 16 days ago with 70 member flags

Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 6 days ago with 45 member flags

Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 18 days ago with 29 member flags

42,000-year-old paintings : \'The oldest work of art ever\' discovered
  Posted 5 days ago with 26 member flags

R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 12 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: