Proof of Ancient Giants?

Ligers are not people

blogs.warwick.ac.uk...
human growth inhibitors are present in both male and female

really just because an animal does something it doesn't neccesarily follow that a human has that ability. Try regenerating a lost limb like a salamander or surviving by eating poisonous berries like a bird

I can't remember the name of the poster now, but whoever pointed out the flaw in my Liger argument - good call. I wasn't aware that was the case.



I doubt Annukai was invented by Sitchen alone, and I doubt that Anua means sun god, as An was a god of the heavens or meant the heavens themselves, and that ki is the sumerian suffix for "from".

Also the sumerian for man is "lu". For example, king is Lugal, which literally means "man" and "big or superior".

ku.li.gu.en silim.sha.za!

(tenner to anyone who translates that!)

Anunaki is a noun used to describe the Babylonian gods of the underworld
it didn't exist in Akkad or Sumer

Sitchin claims they are the gods of heaven when in fact the Gods of heaven were the IGIGI

the Sumerian equivalent of the Babylonian Annunkai were the Anuna

An was the Sumerian sun God, we translate that as Heaven but it really means Sky. The Sumerian concept of heaven was a mountaintop. they had no concept for outer space at all. There is no plural for heaven in Sumerian. It could never be claimed to be heavens.

Lu does not mean man, it is non gender specific and so means person. NA means "man"
the usage of Ki in babylonian Annunaki does not mean "from". Gu means from. Ki in this usage means "Mesopotamia" as this form of Ki is always mentioned in reference to a location in that country.

Anu Na Ki therefore does not mean "those who from heaven to earth came" it means "Men/followers of the Sun God An in Mesopotamia". this is a clear reference to the fact that the Annunaki being cthonic (underworld) deities shouldn't be in mesopotamia at all.

As such they are about the furthest thing you can find in Mesopotamian mythology from Heaven as they are from that other place wooooooh


IGIGI is derived from two words
IGI - eye
GI - Essence of

the essence of the eye
those who watch

source for translations
psd.museum.upenn.edu...

ku - place
li-branch, twig/juniper/oil; fat; cream/to press (oil)"
gu-eat/cord/bird/entirety/force/neck/pulse/square/voice
en-lord/priest
silim-healthy
sha-no translation exists
za-property/man/to close

doesn't make much sense without the indicators as to what form of each sign you used
you're not very fluent are you
still I have fully translated it in accordance with the most definitive sumerian dictionary on earth so thats a tenner you owe me
I have paypal I will send you the details


anyway I thought you claimed before that the Anuna weren't gods
can you tell me what source you are using for all of your claims so far ?


[edit on 3-12-2007 by kerkinana walsky]

Interesting, I was using the www.sumerian.org lexicon; it does not seem to give the same information as the source you use. Where do you know this from?

Also, I applaud your dedication.

John Hallorhan is not a sumerian linguist. I think he's an engineer.
Don't get me wrong he does a great job but because he's not a professional a lot of his sources are outdated as a result.

EPSD (Electronic Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary) is a online resource built by Sumerologists at Pennsylvania university. Pennsylvania university is one of two centres for Sumerian studies in the westrn world (the other is at Oxford). It is as a result constantly updated (every couple of months) and so has the very best information on earth for sumerian linguistics.
Sitchin apparently doesn't use it


psd.museum.upenn.edu...
thankyou for your commendation as to my dedication but wheres my tenner


also you should know that you can't just string together words and expect them to make sense. Sumerian like every other language on earth uses grammar.

Thanks for the link, that'll be one of the first things I do after work!

You know, I thought I was actually correct with the verb strings and not actually just stringing words together. However, as it appears my source is eager but misguided, I have to re-learn what I thought I knew!

Thanks again for the information, I try never to be too proud to be corrected.

If it helps, when I said "tenner" i actually meant "ten blank sheets of paper".

Also, if you have any good links for a lesson on how sumerian grammar works (as I'm obviously mistaken!) they would go down a treat, cheers!

Carl

The bottom line is there were giants, they all died because they were evil cannibals. They were descendents of what ever came down here from the "heavens". Nuff said..... I don't care about brow ridges or their occular circumference and depth...... different species have different anatomy and no one ever said they were human. They said they were anakim, nephalim, giants..... a different genus altogether.

To the closed minded out there....... Open your mind!!!!

It doesn't matter that s8nt is a christian website. I have found the information at other sources. Mostly in old books not on the net.

-Euclid

reply to post by runetang

---

yes giants do exist they were the annunaki and the titans and egyptian gods etc

reply to post by Marduk

---

most of the "evidence"" you displayed was fraud and couldnt be proved but couldnt be disproved either!

reply to post by kerkinana walsky

---

you are really smart