It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

page: 75
164
<< 72  73  74    76  77  78 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 11:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by sleeper

welcome back John!!! I feel a surge in the “Force”---



Thanks sleeper. There is defintely a surge in the 'Force'. In the past few weeks I have come across tons of information of our preparation to mine the moon. There must be upwards of 10 websites with information related to mining the moon. This includes the massive cargo operations to and from Antarctica where I think the main operation is based. The joke is, we are already there and have been for 45 years. Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, SpaceLab, the Shuttle, ISS were all 'cover' projects.

Apparently 'someone' or 'something' or 'some force' wants this information exposed.

I read your blog and it was fascinating. There is no doubt in my mind that your story comes from true facts.

There are those that will profit from your story and those that will still be stuck in denial. Those stuck in denial will complain the loudest.




posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 11:18 PM
link   
This is awesome.


Welcome back on here, John.



Thank you, to the powers that be.



posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 11:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by UnstoppableForce
This is awesome.


Welcome back on here, John.



Thank you, to the powers that be.



I second that. Thank you, to the powers that be, they are great guys.



posted on Jan, 16 2007 @ 11:29 PM
link   
Hey John !

Glad to have you back. We've missed you my friend. You better check Dulce's threads.

Again, nice seeing you here.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 01:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Denied



Various people at NASA, STSCI, The Planetary Society and other organisations have insisted that Hubble can't photograph the moon because it's surface is so bright that it would damage Hubble's optics.



Hmmm interesting... good excuse... so why not take pictures when its in earthshine then?
or indirest sunlight?


ABOUT THIS IMAGE:
A closeup view of Copernicus' terraced walls. Hubble can resolve features as small as 280 feet across.


Says they CAN resolve an image as small as 280 ft, yet they DON'T... certainly not in the images you provided and none that I have seen so far...



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 01:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by VladTheImpaler
but I don’t understand how you people leap to these incredible conclusions based on these horrible images!


Not knowing how you are viewing these "horrible" images makes it impossible to understand why you CAN'T see anything. It has been stated that you must download and view them in a graphic program not in the browser, especially if one is using AOL Netzero or Juno compressed dial up. In any decent graphics editor like photoshop or paintshop pro there is no problem seeing the anomalies, unless you don't want to



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 02:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Zarniwoop
EDIT: to add... I just think there should be two distinct areas of focus on this whole moon subject; One dedicated to documenting the evidence (hopefully the content pages) and then another inviting healthy debate(threads)


LOL I need a staff of web designers and graphic editors

TOO MUCH INPUT to process... exploding computers don't help either...



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 08:09 AM
link   
Sorry for being late. Ive been reading these post from page one all the way to 35 before I started skipping to see how far it got. That is too much. Unfortunetly I forgot to listen to John Lears C2C show which make me mad cause I was really looking forward to it. Due to me skipping I missed out on alot of info but I did find a website that interested me. It was posted around page 25 or 26. Cant really remember. english.pravda.ru... It has a very interesting read about NASA finding man made objects on the moon. Dont know if anyone has read it or not as it was from along time ago and no one really responded to it. Just a short paragraph to get you interested.

Here is an extract from the official press-release: “NASA scientists and engineers participating in exploration of Mars and the Moon reported the results of their discoveries at a briefing at the Washington National Press Club on March 21, 1996. It was announced for the first time that man-made structures and objects have been discovered on the Moon.” The scientists spoke rather cautiously and evasively about these objects, with the exception of an UFO. They always mentioned that the man-made objects are possible, and stated the information was still under study and official results will be published later.

It was mentioned at the briefing as well that the Soviet Union used to own some photo materials proving the presence of such activity on the Moon. And, although it wasn’t identified what kind of activity it was, thousands of photo- and video materials from the Apollos and the Clementine space station showed many parts on the lunar surface where this activity and its traces were perfectly evident. The video films and photos made by US astronauts during the Apollo program were demonstrated at the briefing. People were extremely surprised why the materials hadn’t been presented to the public earlier. NASA specialists answered: “It was difficult to forecast the reaction of people to information that some creatures had been or still are on the Moon. In addition, there were some other reasons to it, which were beyond the control of NASA.”

Do let me know what you guys think. I guess Ill have to read the transcripts for the show now



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 08:33 AM
link   
Is it possible to view the transcript of last nights show without being a subscriber to C2C? If anyone has any information on this, could you please let me know?
I really would like to read it.
thanks



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 09:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Turlis Unfortunetly I forgot to listen to John Lears C2C show which make me mad cause I was really looking forward to it.



Turlis, the show is tonight, Wednesday night. George starts up at 10pm and usually the guest comes on at 11pm.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by Turlis Unfortunetly I forgot to listen to John Lears C2C show which make me mad cause I was really looking forward to it.



Turlis, the show is tonight, Wednesday night. George starts up at 10pm and usually the guest comes on at 11pm.



Welcome back JL... on the c2z site, is it free to listen and / or do I have to register or anything?

Looking forward to the show.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:12 AM
link   
john will you be talking about the dulce base tonight



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:17 AM
link   
Nice pictures! Maybe with this proof, we can find another planet or better, a galaxy!



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:27 AM
link   
I'd love to hear about Dulce base tonight.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:41 AM
link   
Oh, ok. I thought the show was tonight... great that I didn't miss it.

A one month subscription to C2C is only $7 so that's not too bad and it's worth that price to hear what JL's saying about those artifacts that were erased by NASA from those moon photo's. Plus Greg Braden's going to be on tomorrow night and I'm looking forward to hearing him too.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 10:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by elevatedone

Welcome back JL... on the c2z site, is it free to listen and / or do I have to register or anything?

Looking forward to the show.



I just go to the 640KFI website and press "Listen Now". There is no subscription and no fee. That method is good for any radio station that has a website and offers C2C programming.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 11:06 AM
link   
Thanks John! I would have paid for the subscription but if I can listen to it for free that great!

Thanks for the information and looking forward to tonight's program!



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 11:31 AM
link   
John, great to have you back!


But darn, you still haven't answered my question which is almost four months overdue!!
Nothing to do with the Moon, but Saturn. Does it ring a bell??


Cheers!!



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by mikesingh
John, great to have you back!


But darn, you still haven't answered my question which is almost four months overdue!!
Nothing to do with the Moon, but Saturn. Does it ring a bell??


Cheers!!



I can't remember what the question is but if its "What does Saturn really look like?" I don't know, I haven't been there...but sleeper has. C'mon sleeper give us a hint.



posted on Jan, 17 2007 @ 12:58 PM
link   
John Lear = Doer.



new topics

top topics



 
164
<< 72  73  74    76  77  78 >>

log in

join