ok, i have experience in image manipulation and have during a 30min analysis found some inconsistencies within copernicus-5.gif , I need to know whether or not the original orbital moon picture had liquid spilt onto it... as i have found objects in the photo that could be persistant with a fleet of ufo's, i need to rule out the possibility of adulteration... I am sure that due care was taken to ensure the original was kept clean.... I also note that the moon looks strikingly like .... a manufactured object, man-made and very unnatural... there are far too many inconsistencies to list, even within the 30minute window of analysis thaving taken place on the 30th of january 2009.... Contact me for a duplicate of the 'fleet of coffeespill (unidentifiable objects)'.


Yours in the pursuit of integrity,

J.B

- The universe is not as strange as we suppose, it is stranger than we can suppose-

[edit on 31-1-2009 by thetruthisindistinguishab]

[edit on 30-1-2009 by thetruthisindistinguishab]

Originally posted by thetruthisindistinguishabI am sure that due care was taken to ensure the original was kept clean...

Actually no... the originals crashed on the moon with the spacecraft.

The images were processed on board and only a video signal was sent back to Earth

If this is so, these pictures can not be used to prove any kindve existance of structures upon the moon, the skeptical mind could always easily disregard them due to the quality of such pictures. Also, i am aware that john lear recieved the original negatives from nasa archives, and was unable to even process the negatives in nevada for a longgg while after recieval..... Project camelot john lear interviews speak about these orbital photos.... I do think the photo anomaly found was probably from the handling of the printout that was scanned and sent to the ats board..... even so, it is quite possible to find many 'anomalies' simply because of the array and mixture of black and white within this black-and-white orbital photo, a lot of the photo could be analysed as having odd structures due to the shadows on the moon and the black-white colour orientation of the orbital pictures....

Yours in the pursuit of truth,

J.B

[edit on 1-2-2009 by thetruthisindistinguishab]

Originally posted by thetruthisindistinguishab
If this is so, these pictures can not be used to prove any kindve existance of structures upon the moon, the skeptical mind could always easily disregard them due to the quality of such pictures.

The fact that some photos have some noticeable and known problems does not mean that all findings could be considered part of those problems, it just means that we should be aware that those problems exist, in the same way we should be aware that JPEG compression changes the images and not the best format for a good analysis.

Also, i am aware that john lear recieved the original negatives from nasa archives, and was unable to even process the negatives in nevada for a longgg while after recieval.....

I don't know if he got negatives or positives, as far as I remember the negatives were only used once, all other copies were made from positives, but I could be wrong.

I just posted a whole list and lost it.

Okay, re-typed!

Pic1:

second from top: floating orb?

third from top: strange angular objects

long block: possible roadway behind the ridge

bottom: possible footprint

Pic2:

Second block from the left, note a large dark pyramid shape

block on right: buried object with some curvy tubes

bottom: buried cross shape

Pic3: left to right

buried satellite (note the cylinder in the middle and the symmetrical shapes protruding from both sides)

flat objects curving upwards?

a flat object with a dome on top

Pic5:

Some of the objects look like cables

Some strangle flat triangular shapes

Three-sided pyramids (note the angular shadows)

Some smudging middle-left

Bottom-left: grey area has shadows running down indicating a possible triangular roof

Cut away landscape at the top, like a quarry or strip mine

Weird flat object protruding from the surface, top-left

An eagle shape (move in from bottom right)

Far right side in the middle: flat objects buried at an angle with a cylinder on top

Middle, slightly off-centre to the left: a cylinder is lying there

[edit on 3-2-2009 by DieterRabbit]

Hey there
I was listening to the John Lear interview last week on Veritas. I was wondering if Hoagland also now believes that the lunar manned missions never happened as well?
also if no manned missions, how were all the large size film images taken? forgive me if already answered in the threads.

TF

Originally posted by andolin
Go ask John.

He (or she?) should ask Hoagland, not John.

Since we cant share this stuff openly without being censored.

He was never censored, I even think he was given more liberty than most ATS members.

And that is not this thread's subject.

Armap or anyone else:

There is one image in particular that I occasionally search for without success. It was one of a crater with two aliens barely visible crouched down near the rim. I had to format a while back and would appreciate any help in locating that jewel.

In return, I will tell you the secret of how I hailed a spaceship at the age of 13. Ah hell if anyones interested U2U me indiscreminately.