John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS, page 163
Pages: <<  160    161    162    163    164    165    166  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 123 times


reply posted on 6-6-2007 @ 03:31 AM by zorgon
Originally posted by housegroove23You guys are awesome and keep em coming.


Why thank you for those kind words...

And in keeping with that request to "keep em coming" I will once again have to take a side trip to Mars... Now I have had this one for some time, and even used it in "The Keep" page to compare to one in Copernicus, (thought the one in Copernicus is much smaller and harder to see...

Well here it is in Copernicus







Now here is the one on Mars... and since Bluebird in the Martian thread found us the original Malin image, this one is a lot clearer and easier to see...





MSSS Image full gif

MSSS Image Page

Just ignore it folkes... its obviously "just anther rock with tricks of light and shadow"



Thanks to Bluebird for locating this one...

The Bluebird Files at Pegasus

PS Still on Leave.... Just "checking my mail"

[edit on 6-6-2007 by zorgon]


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 10:10 AM by undo
READ THIS FIRST:

P.S. Thanks to the person who made this into a globe from the original mercator map. That was a great undertaking, and you did a fine job.

Here's the image in question. It's very big (4506 x 4317) and over 1 megabyte in size, so it will take awhile to completely download in your browser window or to your desktop. "DEMO" is stamped all over it in a regular grid pattern, so don't mistake the stamps for anomalies. The program I used to correct the color/light and so on, is a demo version of Photoflair and it puts the DEMO stamp on the image (and i used Clarity from Paint Shop Pro, afterwards). Apologies, but that was the best I could get Aristarchus, while still being able to see the rest of the detail on the moon. It was a trade off of brightness vs. detail, depth of field, etc. Aristarchus is just too darn bright (This would look great in 3d, btw!)

All I gotta say is wow. The moon is a very unique ...erm planet, satellite, chunk o' colorful rock, whatever it is. Notice how the color continues to be seen, although only faintly, threw the white regolith (the moon dust). In some places, the regolith appears to be rather sheer, almost a cloudy transparency covering the lower lying brown, gold and green areas. The Mares have alot more color in them than I originally noticed. Not just the dark blue, but also browns and various shades of green. Also take special note of how the left side, along the "banks" of the Mare (blue area) , below and to the left of Aristarchus, have areas that are higher elevation and those are the ones covered with what appears to be a white sheet of moon dust and small shiny craters. You can really see the 3d quality of it, especially along one ridge of "cliffs".. Here's the image:

CLICK THIS EVEN IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN THE MOON ANOMALIES, THIS IS A GREAT, BIG BEAUTIFUL PIC OF THE MOON, IN COLOR AND LOTS OF DETAIL.
>>>>
thestargates.com... <<<<

Anyway, this is gonna be my last post on here for awhile. I need to think happier thoughts and all this conspiracy keeps me thinking negatively. Do let me know what you think of the image, however. I see tons of anomalies in it, just everywhere, and the more you zoom in on it, the better it gets. I hope you enjoy it! It took over 2 hours to upload the bugger via FTP. lol I had to keep coaxing it along, as it would just sit there and think rather than upload, clicking on it regularly seemed to remind it it was supposed to be doing something lol 15kbps lol good grief. Then after taking some 40 minutes and only having uploaded 15 % of the file, it decided to terminate the connection and make me start over.


NOTE TO RIK RILEY: Rik, i just realized that program I linked you to doesn't open tiffs. I suggest you try "Photoflair" www.truview.com... it's the program i used to photo correct the image of the moon in this post. they make you give your personal info but its free for the demo versoin. the result of photo correction ends up with DEMO stamped on but it still lets you zoom in and correct images for better viewing and also save them so you can upload them to the internet, if you have the server space to do it.





[edit on 7-6-2007 by undo]


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 10:44 AM by johnlear
Originally posted by ArMaP



The page for that photo is still available,
here.



Thanks ArMaP. I make the same mistake every time I visit MSSS in trying to get past Gallery.


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 07:52 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by Access Denied
So in YOUR opinion “thousands” of people are viewing this thread because of John’s “special” moon picture? No offense but has it ever occurred to you that maybe thousands (in THEIR opinion) simply enjoy watching a train wreck?


No in MY opinion I am saying thousands of people are interested in lunar and Mars anomalies on a great many threads. I can list a whole bunch, but that would be silly as everyone here knows most of the big ones. And not one of those has John on it...

As to the "train wreck" hypothesis, thats not what my U2U's and emails say from those that follow this thread, but chose not to post...even several skeptics have written me complimenting me on my approach...

So laugh all you like... and tell your NASA insiders to chat with their buddies that DO follow anomalies, and are not laughing.


Originally posted by zorgon
The 16x20 inch negatives are created from the raw data from the video feed.



The first thing you should know is the video feed from the spacecraft was recorded in real-time on magnetic tape so the data could be played back at anytime...


RAW DATA...


The second thing you need to know is that for any given Lunar Orbiter frame there could be an untold number of negatives that were made.


NEGATIVES CAN BE CREATED...


Funny, sounds like you are saying precisely what I said only more winded. Besides I have all that data on the first page of the website... the one with the menu... but thank you for confirming this for us


Some of these negatives (copies), were given to scientists, some were archived, and some were given to a contractor for public distribution etc.


Now you just finished telling us NASA could create the negatives ANYTIME they wanted, from the raw data on the Magnetic tapes... therefore EACH NEGATIVE is an "original", certainly as original as you can get seeing the actual negative crashed on the Moon

And one of those given to the contractors was passed on to John


Got it?


Yup we do... and the result is the images that started this thread



[edit on 7-6-2007 by zorgon]


reply posted on 7-6-2007 @ 08:58 PM by JbT
Ive been on the side lines for what seems like the first couple pages myself.

I have made a couple post here and there stating what I feel to be an outside opinion from the "belivers" and the "denyers". Im on the fence, and will admit it.

But, I wanted to post to support the theory that there is "thousands of people watching this thread". I work in a fairly small town, in which there is a very small community of "UFO'ologists" type people who I happen to know one of the top members. He himself knows of the moon anomolys and when I said to him I was watching this thread, he also said to me (with a smile, like its a small world) that he too was watching it.

This is small potatos, we are in a nook and cranny of the world, yet there is still comon people looking at comon sites, and yes. I belive there is lots, maybe thousands of people watching this thread... waiting, hoping, questioning, pondering, ect.

The fact is, there is not too many sites with as much credibility as ATS does, and John Lear is a very intriguing man for those of us with very open minds.

I would love to put up a challenge for all people who are just sitting here and watching this thread to post something like "Iam watching too". But I dont want to promote clutter on the thread that is large enough. But, Im willing to bet there is many, many people watching this thread for their own reasons, what ever that may be.

P.S. Great work to the big names on this thread. I dont have alot to add myself, other than my opinion of what I see from time to time. Which, I hope helps in the way that you get an opinion from someone "on the fence" still.


reply posted on 9-6-2007 @ 10:13 PM by rikriley
Undo and Zorgon, a well deserved rest from the Moon threads, our brains need R and R every now and then.

Undo, I promised you I would tell you what I am seeing in Mike's posting of the Aristarchus Moon photo. At 100% and 200% auto Zoom I personally loose out on detail. I tighten the photos up from a spread of 33% to 75% auto zoom. I see what you are seeing and to me it is one dimensional the colored highlighted rendition.

I see 3D humanoid statues and structures in the open and between the hedges sort of speak. This is how I am visualizing what I am viewing in 3D. If you will take the Zoom to 33% to 50% and take a high quality rectangular glass magnifier Apprx. 3" X 5" you will see the letters / V C X /. on the lower right hand side of photo it is fairly clear and will shock you at first.

Tilt the the Magnifying glass perpendicular at an apprx. 30 to 50 degree angle. Now you will start to see the details of the structures and ultra modern humanoid statues as you scan right to left I call it stretching the anomolies.

Now scan again from top to bottom holding magnifying glass horizontal between 30 and 50 degrees. Again I call this is stretching the anomolies. If you do not already have a bubble magnifier about the size of a nickle embedded in the glass magnifier I suggest you get one because you are missing out on fine detail or I should I say close ups. This is how I see things better using this technique and everyone has their own technique to see anomolies better.

Undo as you know this photo is loaded with incredible anomolies. Instead of the original photo you brought to our attention I liked the middle of the road photo you called different rendition before colorization. I could see things much better once you enhanced the photo by dimming down the brightness. Great work Undo this is terrific. Rik Riley
Pages: <<  160    161    162    163    164    165    166  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 4 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags
China publishes high-resolution full moon map
  Posted 5 days ago with 19 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 93 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies