John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS, page 164
Pages: <<  161    162    163    164    165    166    167  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 123 times


reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 07:52 PM by rikriley
Kleverone, I think you have made it clear previously about your feelings and thoughts about these Moon claims and photos not being proven to your satisfaction.

164 pages on this thread, John Lear's Moon pictures on ATS have proven to me there is alot going on up there. This thread is constantly in forward progression showing photos and different angles and views of what individuals think they see. There will be and are new discoveries being made by John's support team made up of many dedicated men and women in search of the truth about what is going on with the Moon.

John Lear also responds to many more of his threads with answers to viewers questions about the Moon that has covered volumes of information about what is going on from his opinion. This in fact is very interesting because of his thousands and thousands of viewers tuning in to view photographs that most have never seen before and his educated interpretation of what he sees. One thing for sure people are coming back to his threads for more because of the hundreds of thousands of documented hits.

As far as the soul catcher I believe John gave an update on his latest belief on whether or not it exists. Go back and read his latest comments on the matter.

As you know most viewers do not or or have the time to read all the pages of information and view all the photos presented in John's threads. So many times the viewers enter into reading conversations in his threads and it would be in comparison to leaving out the first 20 chapters of a book of knowing what is actually going on in the story.

I still hold to the thinking the reason the viewers hold back in not giving input is this is all new to them, they are overwhelmed and it is simple shocking to them from what they have been previously told and sold to believe about what is actually going on with the surface and inside the Moon.

So John and all the support team keep up the incredible hard work because thousands of hits tell me you are on to something great that will change the way generations view and think about the Earth's Moon forever. Rik Riley

[edit on 10-6-2007 by rikriley]


reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 02:10 AM by greatlakes
Originally posted by Cygnific
Originally posted by kleverone
I would love nothing more than to tell you that I see definitive structures in those pictures, but I do not.


So what do you think a structure on Mars would look like? Does it have to have windows or does it have to have a roof with tiles? I'm not saying this picture shows a structure, but i would like to hear your definition of what a structure would/should look like for you to be convinced.


It's a tough conundrum. On one hand, the moon images are mainly from apollo/clementine missions, some earlier, some later. Some of these are not the highest quality to conclusively prove either way, some are possibly tampered with, so it would seem that we should focus on Mars images, since the resolution is higher and the tech. updated it seems...

But then again, what the moon has going for it is that its relatively CLOSE to the Earth, and thus AMATEUR astronomers can image it and we have another pool of information to study.

And of course Mars has this as a strike against it, amateur astronomers at present can provide no detailed images of the planet as compared to the images that can be made of the moon by amateurs...

Its a tough nut (no reference to John Lear intended...) with no easy answer. Some images have come close (closest?) such as the "parking garage" but alas, just not conclusive enough for everyone.

The question of "What exactly conclusively proves the existence of intelligently designed structures, buildings, monuments or constructions?" is not an easy one to answer.

From "How to Achieve Contact: Five Promising Strategies" by Allen Tough, Ph.D., University of Toronto,
ieti.org...

To gain some perspective on what these large numbers mean, it is useful to recall that our civilization is only about 10,000 years old, much less by some definitions. Just 100,000 years ago our ancestors were hunter-gatherers using stone tools and only rudimentary language.

If alien civilizations are 100,000 years ahead of us, then they are quite capable of sending intelligent probes to explore other planetary systems. Each probe could be smarter and more knowledgeable than any human being, yet possibly be smaller than a basketball or baseball (Tough 1998b). Even humankind's adolescent technology will likely become capable of launching interstellar probes within 200 years, much sooner if NASA's current plans pan out. So any civilization 100,000 years beyond us presumably developed an interstellar capacity long ago.


Search for an alien object

Strategy #1: Search the solar system and Earth for physical evidence of an alien object or its effects.

(a) Within the solar system, search for unassailable evidence of an alien object. This object might be a probe or spacecraft, for instance, or its discarded parts. Such a search might focus on the Moon, the asteroid belt, or the Lagrange equilibrium points (Freitas and Valdes, 1980). Alternatively, the alien object might be a building, a monument, or some other artificial structure. Indeed, an alien intelligence may have deliberately left an artifact for us to discover at some special landmark in the solar system, such as the highest point on Mars or the deepest canyon on Venus, or in some carefully chosen spot that we will explore someday because of our scientific curiosity or our appreciation of beauty. Or equipment might have been stored below the surface of some body (perhaps in natural cracks or passages) to protect it from damage by cosmic radiation and micrometeorites.

Baugher (1985, p. 155) has even suggested that an alien probe might, on one of the geologically dead moons in the solar system, "construct a vault filled with information and artifacts.... The vault could contain a description of the civilization that sent the probe, as well as a set of instructions for the initiation of contact."


Simply looking for and finding rectilinear shapes and lines would not be conclusive evidence in itself as these can be made by natural processes, as evidenced here on Earth in numerous examples.

If you look at the Pyramids, this structure I feel gives many examples of what to look for when trying to find intelligently designed structures, the mathematical equations and ratios that are embedded within the pyramids are all signs of intelligent design and if these were found elsewhere in the solar system conclusively, then we would have our evidence.

Has it been found by Richard C. Hoagland in the Cydonia region of Mars and his study of the area? Whole other topic.. and running outa chars


[edit on 6/11/2007 by greatlakes]


reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 02:53 AM by yfxxx
I'm one of the "hundreds of thousands" of lurkers on this thread (I have read large parts of the discussion, and have seen essentially all of the photos). I can safely assume that my general opinion about the thread subject is known to the main drivers of the thread, and therefore I don't see any need to repeat it here (suffice it to say that the supporters of the thread's premise think of me most likely as a complete idiot, jerk or ***hole, and probably all of the three and more ).

Anyway, as for this photo ...

Originally posted by zorgon
so far all the regular skeptics in three threads have totally ignored comment on this one, yet want us to show clear images of anomalies..

Okay THIS one is very clear... no enhancement, no brightness gamma etc... taken straight from the Malin image strip.




... I'd like to know exactly where and what the "clear" anomaly is supposed to be. As much as I look, I only see lighter and darker patches of surface, and my mind apparently interpretes this simply as an effect of different lighting and different surface material. Because this photo is offered as a "clear" example for the fact that the planets (in this case, Mars) are not what "they" tell us they are, I'm really interested what I'm supposed to "clearly" see. Any factual answer will be appreciated (even if it's seasoned with remarks about my personal intelligence and state of mind ).

Regards
yf
Pages: <<  161    162    163    164    165    166    167  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 4 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags
China publishes high-resolution full moon map
  Posted 5 days ago with 19 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 95 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies
Whitney Houston dead at 48
  Breaking General News, Posted 12 hours ago, 26 replies