It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by golemina
You seem to have fallen off the needle head you were dancing on...
'The statistic' I am 'most likely to latch on to' would be the one where you declared smallpox eradicated in 1977...
Suddenly, your 'saving lives' (presumeably using innoculations ) for an outbreak that doesn't exist?
Originally posted by Long Lance
Now, the original issue remains: is controlled natural exposure more hazardous than the commercial edition or not? is it totally out of whack or just a bit loony, is it barely defensible or maybe even useful practice if used with caution ??
thoughts?
Originally posted by golemina
- MDs are CAUSING the autism.
- MDs have NO interest in researching the true root causes of autism.
- MDs block ANY attempts by ANYONE ELSE to do ANY independent research.
- MDs engage in MASSIVE dinsinformation campaigns to attack any who even thinks about this type research.
- The ENTIRE medical community systematically attacks ANY treatments/ideas for the relief/cure of autism that demonstrate ANY efficacy.
Just last week on NBC Dateline Stone Phillips (Stone "I'm SO pretty. I'm SO pretty" Phillips you are a TOTAL hack. ) did a piece supposedly about a 'controversial' treatment technique... But is was the most blantant of attack pieces...
www.whale.to...
[/quoted]
THAT link, Golemina, sums up why I think you're a joke.
Whale.to ? Really? This is the same website that claims measles can be miraculously cured via a vitamin A and C injection.
Are you seriously trying to tell me no one ever ingests vitamin A or C while they have measles? No kid in the 1920s who came down with measles ever ate an orange or drank milk or ate eggs? Seriously?
Mariella
Originally posted by golemina
mastering that quote feature.
Maybe it's just me... but it just seems like someone that is supposed to be a healer would be more concerned about the horror of what is being reported...
With your usual attention to detail Bls4doc... Maybe you missed that it is a 'reprint'.
The irony is just too delicious... I'm standing here accusing MDs who knowingly inject children with innoculations containing mercury of basically being murderers. And I'm the one being 'ridiculed'...
Originally posted by Long Lance
Now, the original issue remains: is controlled natural exposure more hazardous than the commercial edition or not? is it totally out of whack or just a bit loony, is it barely defensible or maybe even useful practice if used with caution ??
thoughts?
The irony is just too delicious... I'm standing here accusing MDs who knowingly inject children with innoculations containing mercury of basically being murderers. And I'm the one being 'ridiculed'...
Originally posted by Byrd
I'm horrified, actually. This "controlled natural exposure" is a very dangerous and very stupid tactic.
..
After that people simply stopped believing what medical staff says.
Now doctors are pleading with parents to trust their word.
Originally posted by Byrd
Discuss issues -- DO NOT SNIPE AT EACH OTHER
I hope this is clear.
If you have counterpoints, bring them forward with links to sites with numbers and cases. Don't start making snarky comments about another's information.
This isn't a flamefest or a brawl. It's a discussion.
Kapish?