posted on May, 16 2006 @ 01:21 PM
Originally posted by jtma508
A lot could have been accomplished in that time.
If the Government did 911, they'd've prepared such a video before hand. They said its being withheld because of the moussaoui trial, that trial is
over, now its being realased.
Besides the fact that people actually SAW the plane hit the pentagon, that there is plane debris at the pentagon, and that a plane was hijacked.
Hmmm. So only footage from one of those possible camera angles is to be released?
And what of it? If they did it, then 5 years down the road, they could've faked the video from every angle. Hell, 5 years down the road we'd've
'found' a tourist who got the whole thing on his video camera, with the plane's wing going right over him and sparks flying with arab terrorirsts
giving him the finger from the cockpit.
Is that possibility really so far fetched?
Is it really so immpossible for arab hijackers to hit a giant building?????
This only proves an airplane hit the Pentagon.
Which is precisely what people claim didn't happen.
How do we know its real? Because THEY say so???
How do you know the footage of the WTC hits were real? If they can manufacture a vid of something hitting the Pentagon, why not the WTC? How do we
know that anything is really real?
Am i supposed to change my mind about something???
I'd say that, if there is a video showing a plane hitting the pentagon, and also people who saw a plane hit it, and debris from a plane, and planes
hijacked that day, and planes that hit other buildings that day, then, you should probably be thinking 'looks like a plane hit the pentagon' at
least, no? Regardless of whether or not it was a false flag operation.