It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Do YOU think its making the world any more safe?
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
...........
So the Palestinians send Qassim rockets into Israel? Who invaded and occupied the Palestinian Territories? Even after a ceasfire is declared the Israelis continue to shell Gaza. Were the SOE-backed Maquis terrorists or legitimate resistance fighting an illegal occupation?
You didn't "deny ignorance", you demonstrated your own.
.................
And with Beslan, I guess we can overlook the fact that the Chechyans took that school hostage to get Russian troops out of Chechnya.
Originally posted by Boatphone
The War on Terror is making America more safe, and powerful. And the War on Terror is bringing more freedoms to people around the world.
There were less attacks before the War on Terror, but they were bigger and were treated like crimes instead of acts of war.
UBL, and other terrorists were willing to blame the U.S. and attack us because they felt that America had lost its will and resolve to fight-back.
President Bush, has proved UBL wrong, and shown the world that attacking America is a bad move. And doing so will have great and grave reactions. We now are fighting more terrorists attacks because we have taken the fight deep into terrorist safe-zones.
They attacks are many but they are smaller, and they are far far away from American soil. The War on Terror is working well.
-- Boat
Originally posted by Nakash
So here we have a Muslim (Jamuhn) who says that taking a school full of children and killing them is a legitimate way to protest a war in Chechnya against a bunch of Jihadis.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
there were less attacks before the war on terror, thank you end of story. we haven't made the world safer, but more under watch and scared.
................................
Originally posted by Muaddib
I guess those don't count huh?....
Originally posted by Jamuhn
Of course they count, that's what he said there are more now, as in less then. As in, they happened in the past too just not as much. Right?
[edit on 9-5-2006 by Jamuhn]
Originally posted by MuaddibWhat I understand he is saying is that allowing terrorists to run amok and without restrictions would have made the world safer...
Perhaps we should allow what the government of Sudan has done by declaring a jihad against non-Muslims and exterminating non-Muslims at least since 1983 to this day.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
......................
The fact that in Darfur they are exterminating Muslims right now does not matter to you? Is it only non-Muslims for you that deserve to be spared from terror? I don't think this is what you are saying, but you seem to be trying to skip right over the situation in Darfur.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
*propaganda end*
I would like to address the "freedom around the world" laughable statement, but I think its safe to say the rest of the people on here know better.
there were less attacks before the war on terror, thank you end of story.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
alright fine you want to go in and play the innocent card? yea ok lets go look at the CIA opperation done under CIA director Allen Dulles. Over thowing Irans government, installing a pro US dictatorship? you are found guilty on this one.
Lets see supplying billions of dollars and weapons to sadam, supplying billions of dollars worth in weapons to iran, then lets let the iran-iraq war spark off after we have sold them these billion and billions of dollars in weapons. as one starts to win, we support the other side, then when the table change we switch sides.
pretty much made sure they killed as many as possible in the region to further weaken it. That was for profit, no democracy excuse there. your are found guilty on this one too.
im sure you would like to believe these terrorists just hate freedom
Screw you and your "safe" world
Originally posted by Boatphone
Yes, guilty of a good policy. We needed to have a stable government in Iran that would be friendly with the West. If we had not restored the Shah to power then Iran would have fallen to Soviet influence and force.
By doing this we help avoid a confrontation between the West, and the Soviet Union.
Also, the Shah extended suffrage to women, a good thing!
Saddam's Iraq went to war with Iran on its own. He made that choice because of his greed for power. Yes, we supplied weapons (at times to both, but far more to Iraq) because if either side won a complete victory it would mean trouble for the United States.
If the United States didn't supply weapons to Iraq-Iran then other nations would have. Nations like Russia, France, Italy, Germany.
Those nations went to war with each other, and kept fighting mean after the U.S. tried to end the fighting. In fact, the Ayatollah Khomeini declared that agreeing to end the fighting was like "drinking posion" for him.
No, Iran & Iraq made sure to do that.
I don't see how you can possibly say that they don't hate freedom. All the facts support this...
-- The terrorists in Iraq threatened to kill anyone who took part in voting.
-- The Wahhbists (like bin Laden) teach that voting is a sin.
-- The terrorists teach that allowing women to vote, or show their faces in public is against the law.
-- They teach that all people must conform to Islam or be killed.
Does this sound like a group of "freedom lovers" to you?
Stop making absurd arguments, with no evidence to back up your wild lambasting.
Screw me? You don't even have a basic understanding of the Middle East, if you did then you would be making such a fool of yourself.
-- Boat
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
...........
So the Palestinians send Qassim rockets into Israel? Who invaded and occupied the Palestinian Territories? Even after a ceasfire is declared the Israelis continue to shell Gaza. Were the SOE-backed Maquis terrorists or legitimate resistance fighting an illegal occupation?
You didn't "deny ignorance", you demonstrated your own.
.................
Do you even know where the word "Palestinian" comes from? or what it means? or who lived in that region for thousands of years?
If you are trying to imply that the Israeli people are occupying a region which they never lived in in ancient times, you are wrong, and shows your bias against the Israeli people, as so many others do around here when it comes to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.
BTW, the Arab people were mostly nomadic until Mohammed started uniting tribes.... Most of the Middle East had different ethnic groups which lived in those lands for thousands of years. Until the Muslim crusades began, and they began expanding their territories spreading Islam as they went.
BTW, the Israeli government gave part of it's territory to the Palestinians, and what did they do? Palestinian terrorists are using those areas which are closer to israeli towns and attacking from there.
Now the Palestinian government is ruled by a terrorist organization....and there are people who still want to blame Israel?....
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by Jamuhn
......................
but you seem to be trying to skip right over the situation in Darfur.
Not true, and even in the past I have started threads about what is happening in places like dafur. I have even spoken and given links with photos and videos of what happens to moderate Muslims in regions were Islamic extremism rules.
...
BTW, most of the civilians in Sudan are/were not armed, yet the government backed Arab militias and stopped food and medical shipments to those people that were not Arab.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Lets see supplying billions of dollars and weapons to sadam,
Which countries are owed the most money by Iraq?
Iraq's Gulf state neighbors are owed the most, at $30 billion. Japan is next at $9 billion, Russia at $8 billion, France at $8 billion, and Germany at $4 billion.
China to waive Iraq debt if given greater role in rebuilding
(AFP)
29 February 2004
ABU DHABI - Beijing is ready to forgive a big part of the estimated 5.8 billion dollars owed to it by the previous regime of Saddam Hussein if Chinese companies are allowed into major rebuilding projects in Iraq.
OUTSTANDING CONTRACTS
The odious debt doctrine would also seem to apply to the $57 billion in outstanding contracts, mainly to Russia, France and China. Many of these claims are for questionable contracts for oil exploration and development. As noted, Resolution 1483 sets up a procedure for the evaluation of outstanding contracts. However, it is not clear whether the UN will have ultimate authority to approve or disqualify a contract.
Moscow has important economic assets in Iraq:
A Soviet-era debt of $7 billion to $8 billion, generated by arms sales to Iraq during the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. Adjusted for inflation, that debt is worth from $10 billion to $12 billion today.
Lucrative contracts to develop giant oil fields and wells in Iraq, signed by Russia’s major oil company, LUKoil, and the government-owned Zarubezhneft and other companies. These contracts, worth as much as $30 billion over 20 years, include the Western Qurna oil field and wells already developed by the Russian oil companies Slavneft and Tatneft.
Trade in Russian goods under the U.N.–sponsored oil-for-food program, worth between $530 million and $1 billion for the six months ending in December 2001 (the volume of illegal trade between Russia and Iraq is not known).
Originally posted by grimreaper797
supplying billions of dollars worth in weapons to iran,
Originally posted by grimreaper797
supplying billions of dollar worth in weapons to saudi arabia,
Originally posted by grimreaper797
then the same in israel.
For reactor design and construction, Israel sought the assistance of France. Nuclear cooperation between the two nations dates back as far as early 1950's, when construction began on France's 40MWt heavy water reactor and a chemical reprocessing plant at Marcoule. France was a natural partner for Israel and both governments saw an independent nuclear option as a means by which they could maintain a degree of autonomy in the bipolar environment of the cold war.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
then lets let the iran-iraq war spark off after we have sold them these billion and billions of dollars in weapons. .........
Originally posted by grimreaper797
your are found guilty on this one too.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Lets take a look at all these situations, stop ignoring the real past. you remember the attacks, but not the reason they occured. im sure you would like to believe these terrorists just hate freedom, but apparently you dont hear yourself to realize how stupid and pointless that sounds.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
I love the land that I live in but I despise the people running it, and those people supporting them.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Your fighting and wars, and you call yourselves defenders of peace? You wouldn't know what peace is, your too busy trying to fight everyone.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
I want you to look at each dead soldier, each parents eyes, and if you can still tell me that all that is worth this never ending fight well then I can't even consider you human.