It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IAF101
Fact one, After the US involvment in IRAQ there hasnt been a single act of terrorism in continental USA.
FAct two, There is much more awareness and greater pressure on terrrorists in the world today that ever before.
Fact three, due to the unprecedented levels of policing in the USA it is much much harder for terrorists to operate inside the USA.
Originally posted by infinite
...............................
under Saddam, support suicide bombings in Israel and gave money to their families, but there was no clear link to Al Qaeda.
Originally posted by infinite
Amercia citizens are now targets, more than before, in certain areas of the World due to US involvement in Iraq. Final point, define "terrorism"
Originally posted by infinite
Fact two: It hasn't change. There has always have been, especially in Europe and Israel. Britain, France, Spain etc have had 100 of years of terrorism Britain has had terrorism since the 1800s. Israel has suffered decades of terrorism. Middle East has always suffered from terrorism.
Originally posted by infinite
Fact three: Again, America isn't the world. And you are wrong, America does have a large number of domestic terrorist groups which is very alarming, ranging from Animal threats, Fundo-Christains, Neo-Nazi's, etc. All are active and are worrying the FBI.
Originally posted by infinite
The statement and title of this thread is about the World being a safer place, not the United States of America.[edit on 11-5-2006 by infinite]
Originally posted by marg6043
The world is not safe as long as Bush is in power, sad but true, even our country is in the greatest danger ever and is not due to terrorist.
But from within our own government.
Sad times are coming our way.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Not to mention that even Children in many countries in the Middle East, mostly those who live in Islamic countries ruled by Sharia law, are used to fight also.
Originally posted by Boatphone
House of Bush? What does that even mean?
Are you telling me that you don't think EVERY SINGLE US PRESIDENT SINCE WWI HAS NOT BEEN FRIENDLY WITH SAUDI ARABIA?
And why is that? The strict Islamic law? No, it's because Saudi Arabia is the worlds largest provider of oil. The world needs oil.
Basics Souljah, Basics...
Originally posted by Muaddib
Not to mention that even Children in many countries in the Middle East, mostly those who live in Islamic countries ruled by Sharia law, are used to fight also. Many of these kids first toy are wodden rifles,
Originally posted by Muaddib
Originally posted by infinite
...............................
under Saddam, support suicide bombings in Israel and gave money to their families, but there was no clear link to Al Qaeda.
Wrong....fact 1. There was a clear link between Iraq/Saddam and Al Qaeda, the link that was not clear was if Saddam had any involvement in 9/11....there is a difference.
Originally posted by Souljah
Basics of CAPITALISM - not Basics of Demoracy, Liberty and Justice for ALL...
Originally posted by Souljah
Basics of CAPITALISM - not Basics of Demoracy, Liberty and Justice for ALL...
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
When I was a kid all I wanted for Christmas was a toy rifle, the more realistic the better. I don't remember the Australian government using me to fight.
Originally posted by Boatphone
All systems of government need oil Souljah, and all Presidents have kept up the important and freindly relations with Saudi Arabia.
I agree with you that Saudi Arabia has a bad human rights record with women, that's why I'm so happy that now (thanks to President Bush) that women have the right to vote in Afganistan!
Your argument will always be weak when you try to blame all the world's problems on President Bush.
-- Boat
Originally posted by HowlrunnerIV
You gotta be $hittin' me...Atreidies you've sunk really low with this one, this is just pathetic.
When I was a kid all I wanted for Christmas was a toy rifle, the more realistic the better. I don't remember the Australian government using me to fight.
Iraq's insurgent children learn how to become killers
AQEEL HUSSEIN IN LATIFIYAH AND COLIN FREEMAN
IN BAGHDAD
SITTING cross-legged on the mosque floor, the 12-year-old boys listen avidly as the tough-looking man in front of them holds up a rocket-propelled grenade.
"Be careful of the Americans, but don’t fear their vehicles and technology," he says, turning the diamond-shaped warhead before a dozen pairs of widening eyes. "You see this small bomb? It can destroy any US Army Humvee and all the soldiers inside."
.................
The number of hardcore fighters might now be only about 3,500, a fraction of previous estimates of 20,000.
Iraqi authorities, meanwhile, are already noticing a dramatic drop in the age of attackers.
"The ringleaders are paying kids to do a lot of their attacks now because they have lost a lot of the senior people," said Lieutenant Asif Khamel, a senior officer at a US and Iraqi-run police station in the Sunni Triangle city of Baquba, where a 12-year-old boy was recently arrested during a mortar attack.
"The people attacking us are getting a lot younger. We recently arrested three kids aged 17 or so who killed some police officers."
Hisham Hussein, a policeman in Baghdad’s notorious Haifa Street, added: "I would say we have about 50 children aged 15 to 16 fighting here, and some as young as nine or 10 who are used as spies. Recently we arrested four 13-year-olds during an attack on our forces."
Originally posted by Souljah
Hey - isn't Saudi Arabia; A BIG USA ALLY, and not to mention a BIG BUSH FAN, also a Shari Islamic States? And if I am not mistaken, it is one of the Islamic states with the Hardest form of Sharia. I guess you do not have a problem with them at all.
.............
Members of the Al Saud royal family and Saudi officials, historians, activists and religious leaders
In a rare interview, then-Crown Prince Abdullah, now the king of Saudi Arabia, answers questions about democracy in his kingdom, his 2002 visit with President Bush in Crawford, Texas, and how the struggle today with Al Qaeda and other fundamentalists compares to his father King Abd al-Aziz's confrontation in the 1920s with the fervent Wahhabi Islamists, the Ikhwan. This interview, translated from Arabic, was conducted by producer Martin Smith on Dec. 11, 2004 in Riyadh.
...........
A Saudi attorney, Bassim Alim was among a prominent group of Saudis who in early 2004 petitioned the royal family for reforms, including constitutional changes and a larger role for women. He discusses why young Saudis today are attracted to extremism and why political change is the strongest weapon for combating radical Islamists. "Those extremists who would further confuse society, would be simply exposed for what they are." As for the prospects for change, he says, "… reform is yet being debated by the top people in the ruling family. I would say that some of them are perhaps pushing for some kind of reform; others are resisting it. But nothing concrete is going to be done until we have a consensus." This interview was conducted by producer Martin Smith on Dec. 6, 2004 in Jeddah.
....................
A historian at Riyadh's King Saud Univerity and a crusader for women's rights, Dr. al-Fassi grew up in the '60s and '70s, a time of relative liberalization in the kingdom before the retrenchment in the 1980s. Dr. al-Fassi talks about what an ordinary woman growing up in Saudi Arabia can expect, how religious leaders preach women's inferiority to men, and why she is cautiously hopeful change is coming, but slowly. "It's not coming smoothly. Every time they are coming forward, they are going backward … some more steps." As an example, she cites the country's first elections on Feb. 10, 2005 for half of the municipal councils. So far only men can participate, but she is happy that women joined forces to protest being excluded. "We were very active in the media … This was, from our point of view, a big success, because we made a difference, we didn't stay still." This interview was conducted by producer Martin Smith on Dec. 10, 2004 in Riyadh.
................
Prince Bandar has served as Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the U.S. since 1983 and in this interview speaks candidly about the problems within his own country, about relations between the U.S., Saudi Arabia and other Middle East governments, and about Saudi Arabia's role in the fight against terrorism.
Originally posted by Boatphone
All systems of government need oil Souljah, and all Presidents have kept up the important and freindly relations with Saudi Arabia.
I agree with you that Saudi Arabia has a bad human rights record with women, that's why I'm so happy that now (thanks to President Bush) that women have the right to vote in Afganistan!
AI - Saudi Arabia
The violations were perpetuated by the strictly secretive criminal justice system and the prohibition of political parties, trade unions and independent human rights organizations. Hundreds of suspected religious activists and critics of the state were arrested, and the legal status of most of those held from previous years remained shrouded in secrecy. Women continued to suffer severe discrimination. Torture and ill-treatment remained rife. At least 48 people were executed. Over 5,000 Iraqi refugees continued to live in Rafha camp as virtual prisoners. International non-governmental human rights organizations were denied access to the country and the government failed to respond to any of the concerns raised by AI during the year.
Your argument will always be weak when you try to blame all the world's problems on President Bush.
Originally posted by infinite
Fact one: United States Of America isn't the World. USA is a Union, North America is a continent. Are you saying Iraq was the HQ for all of the terrorist problems of the World?
Iraq did, under Saddam, support suicide bombings in Israel and gave money to their families, but there was no clear link to Al Qaeda. Amercia citizens are now targets, more than before, in certain areas of the World due to US involvement in Iraq.
Fact two: It hasn't change. There has always have been, especially in Europe and Israel.
Fact three: Again, America isn't the world. And you are wrong, America does have a large number of domestic terrorist groups which is very alarming, ranging from Animal threats, Fundo-Christains, Neo-Nazi's, etc. All are active and are worrying the FBI.
The statement and title of this thread is about the World being a safer place, not the United States of America.