It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jritzmann
I hate to be the one to break it to everyone, but ufowatchdog is a highly respected site by those who want the real answers.
UFOwatchdog makes people accountable for their claims, and therefore aids greatly in the UFO field. The man doesnt sit on his armchair, he truly researches claims and the people behind them. I would encourage you to actually read the site, and the collected research. He deals in facts, not heresay and rumor, like the rest of this field.
Had dinner with CIA Director and spun tale of having briefed CIA Director about ETs for hours. Hosted press conference with credible UFO witnesses on Capitol Hill - ruined it and his own credibility by selling the work of others with his name on it and using bogus witnesses
Originally posted by Musclor
hello jritzmann
Originally posted by jritzmann
I hate to be the one to break it to everyone, but ufowatchdog is a highly respected site by those who want the real answers.
UFOwatchdog makes people accountable for their claims, and therefore aids greatly in the UFO field. The man doesnt sit on his armchair, he truly researches claims and the people behind them. I would encourage you to actually read the site, and the collected research. He deals in facts, not heresay and rumor, like the rest of this field.
Just an example : Quoted from Ufowatchdog, about Steven Greer :
Had dinner with CIA Director and spun tale of having briefed CIA Director about ETs for hours. Hosted press conference with credible UFO witnesses on Capitol Hill - ruined it and his own credibility by selling the work of others with his name on it and using bogus witnesses
So, you call that fact ? Does the person calling the briefing with CIA director a "tale" have something solid to back up its claim ? What about the so called "bogus witnesses" ? Does he have facts to prove this ?
To me this is just someone sharing his OWN opinion about something, his OWN "truth". But certainly not FACTS.
Originally posted by jritzmann
And you need to answer the questions I asked you. I dont see any answers here, just more supposition.
So, you call that fact ? Does the person calling the briefing with CIA director a "tale" have something solid to back up its claim ? What about the so called "bogus witnesses" ? Does he have facts to prove this ?
To me this is just someone sharing his OWN opinion about something, his OWN "truth". But certainly not FACTS.
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
Ok It seems like people didnt even visit UFOwatchdog to read Maussan's profile. I will copy and paste them here for you Maussan's supporters to refute:
Promoter and supporter of various UFO hoaxes. Constantly claims to have scientific proof, but nevers seems able to produce it when asked. Claimed to have radar tapes confirming UFOs in Mexico airspace. Was reportedly asked for the tapes - the tapes never came to fruition. Supported Hale-Bopp UFO hoax made infamous via Art Bell and Courtney Brown. Told people at a 1996 UFO conference that stars in the sky were actually giant UFOs hovering in space above the planet. Said this was reason stars shifted position in sky! Sold infamous tape of daylight UFO to a television network for a reported $120,000 - the tape was proven to be a hoax. Maussan has also supported the Billy Meier UFO fraud. Maussan is now best known for his promotion of the shameless Reed UFO Fraud. Maussan claims to have scientific proof of the Reed UFO Fraud - again, he has yet to produce it. Is reported to be selling a TV series to Telemundo in L.A. - one episode is on the Reed UFO Fraud except that Maussan is pushing it as real. Beware of journalists that don't report all of the facts...
www.ufowatchdog.com...
So this tells me that this guy is not only gullable, but he'll push and spin anything that supports alien presence on this planet as long as he can get some form of gain from it. He also made 120,000 off that video(alot of money). That alone tells you not to trust this guy.
The fact that some of the information listed there is flatout wrong but stays on there ridiculing people tells me they are NOT there to "watch" anything but to discredit them every chance they get.
Billy Meier fraud? Well congratulations, you're the first to discover that.
Who knows what else is wrong, and who is ufowatchdog to say who's right or wrong?
It's funny people need a site like UFOwatchdog, "well I can't take his word for it, but I believe HIS word because I'm a skeptic and he's being skeptic too".
It's moorewatch all over again. Lets bitch at the people who're trying to find the truth with their own money. And god forbid if they make money doing what they like!! Hipocrites..
Like $120.000 is alot of money, for all you know that could be the first sum of money in 5 years.. maybe even 20. Ofcourse, the site doesn't mention that.
All I see is hearsay and not alot of sources to back it up.
And you accuse people of being gullable based on reading 5 lines on a website!? I think we have a new example for the schoolbooks depicting irony.
Originally posted by TrappedSoul
And i'll bet someone will soon tell us these are just ice particles
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
Well thats what we have to consider. What information that they have posted is FLAT OUT WRONG? I posted Maussan's case from Ufowatchdog and Bolded the important issues that you cant dodge. And I put them up for some people to verifty whether those statements were true or not. However, I say they are becuase UFOWatchDog has hard working people who have been following alot of these UFO phonies.
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
UFOWatchDog is believed becuase they try to resort to factual information that indicates that someone is a fraud. If UFOwatchdog just starting spitting out claims of "this person is wrong becuase I say so," then people would take them less seriously. So it goes back to what I said before, if there is a particular issue you want to dispute on Maussan's credibility, then feel free to do so.
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
I dont have a problem with credible people. My beef comes with frauds who hurt this profession and those frauds need to be hunted down like a hungry tiger(unfed for 7 days) who has just spotted a baby buffalo.
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
Umm..... I think you forgot to replace the period(.) with a comma(,) thus making it $ 120,000 and NOT $ 120.000. A $120,000 is ALOT of money. That alone tells you how much of a con-artist this guy is.
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
How do you know that what was said against Maussan was not true?
Originally posted by kyateLaBoca
That website provides a good warning label. If you havent noticed by now, this field is full of frauds. Here is another scam www.starshipcapricorn.org which is related to the fraud of NESARA.
Originally posted by Shroomery
Originally posted by jritzmann
And you need to answer the questions I asked you. I dont see any answers here, just more supposition.
Oh really? You're the one "supposing" the pope let up his balloons that day. And what question did you ask really?
Weither or not I contacted a weatherman? Do you really think that is a question that should be answered to explain the video?
Or maybe you wanted me to figure out the height?
Tell me, what use would that be?
Do I need the height to see that they are in formation? No
Do I need the height to see that they are moving fast? No
I think it is you who's avoiding the questions. Maybe you could explain us at what height balloons fly in formation at those speeds. I'm really interested to know. Oh and please back your pope tale with a statement of a theology professor, cause I don't buy it!
Originally posted by jritzmann
You dont "buy" much of anything I have to say anyway, so stop following me post to post.