Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
AboveTopSecret.com is a professional "COINTELPRO" operation using secret black-operations funding to publish and promote disinformation as part
of the U.S. Government's agenda to deflect and discredit conspiracy theorists.
Well, there's a big difference between being a democratic forum allowing all free speech and being a totally owned and operated lie-factory.
I don't believe the admins of this board are being paid by any shadowy, nefarious investors with the intention of bribing them to supply us (their
audience) with lies.
I do know, however, there are a preponderance of "trolls" on this forum nowadays, many of whom are being covertly defended in their "flaming" of
"noobs" by the forum mods who choose to side with them, or who are afraid of their influence, and who take a liberal interpretaton of the T&S
agreement to abuse their authority to censor and threaten to ban newer members, even if their posts are made on topic and in good faith.
Let's remember that two criminals who act together are only "accomplices," but that as soon as a third becomes involved, it becomes a
"conspiracy." I've been doggedly trolled by three forum posters (I'll omit their screen-names for fear of my account, but I feel sure they'll
reveal themselves presently), and harassed on their behalf by no more than three moderators (I'm definitely not mentioning their screen-names). This
implies, at least to me, the presence of two separate "conspiracies" on ATS:
1) the "conspiracy" among "trolls" to "triangulate" their "flaming" and (again, using "delphi strategy") provoke their victim until their
victim blames themselves, admits defeat and either leaves or is allowed to stay on condition of becoming one of the "troll's" fans. This is the
equivalent of the violent blood-letting ceremonies of gang "quoting," used in frats like S&B and cults like Jonestown. The idea is to take turns
sarcastically complimenting and crudely insulting anything the poster reveals about themselves. They do this and call it, among themselves, "denying
ignorance." (I'll return to this motif in a moment.)
2) the "conspiracy" among "mods" to "look the other way" and to "wash their hands" both before, during and after troll attacks on new members.
For this to be a legitimate "conspiracy," per se, by definition, it would require the mods to have discussed and agreed on this strategy with one
another before having implimented it in any case. The "mods" on a forum are the same in that form of "community" as are police in cities. Whenever
they allow "trolls" to use ad hominem, and censor the defenses of these trolls' targets, they are engaging in the same form of crime IA of a PD
would consider "racketeering." In this case, cops or mods cease to be civil-servants and become an organised, criminal "protection racket."
"DENY IGNORANCE" :: What Does This Mean?
This forum is dedicated to research and speculation on organized disinformation and deflection efforts by governments, covert agencies, and
organizations. Discussion topics and follow-up responses in this forum will likely tend to lean in favor of conspiracies, scandals, and cover-ups.
Members who would seek to refute such theories should be mindful of AboveTopSecret.com\'s tradition of focusing on conspiracy theory, cover-ups, and
Now, I've been called a "fraud" by trolls on this forum for sharing my own original ideas, and I've been accused of "hawking my wares" by mods
on this forum for posting links to books I've written which are free. I am not a corporation claiming "personhood." I am not a spam-bot. I am a
human being, attempting to communicate my own internal ideas in fair and legal ways. I have been brutally libeled and had my name, reputation and
professional standing mudded, tarred and feathered here on this public forum, probably by people half my age. And why? I was asked once, "Would you
like to be interviewed by Project Camelot?" and I declined. That is my best guess as to their motive for now cyber-stalking me. They believed this
"denial" for an interview was proof of my "ignorance."
However, before I do get banned for "spilling the beans" and "waking the sleeping giant" with these counter-accusations I'm making here, I would
like to add my side of the argument for the record. What does "deny ignorance" mean to me? It does not extend to include as an ideal those who would
use it, champion its title, to defend their own choice to not research or explore new ideas. You cannot "deny ignorance" by loudly "ignoring" new
ideas, then simply "denying" that is your strategy. Currently, the only "ignorance" I would like to "deny" would be the fast, shoot-first /
ask-later, loose-interpretation of the T&S agreement by the mods. I am not "advertising" or "selling" anything here. As far as the 3-part
"conspiracy of trolls'" accusations of me to that effect, you assume a false motive.
To me, to "deny ignorance" means to learn and to create new ideas. And if this definition does not fit your T&S interpretation, you can come to
where I live and personally try to fist fight me. Otherwise, stop abusing your extended authorities to threaten me with "warnings" then ignoring my
requests for guidance and further teaching of how the T&S works. You are all acting like children, given the anonymity to abuse without consequence. I
am only asking you to stop for a moment, and take a look at yourselves. I am not calling anyone a "criminal" or "troll" by name, so if that is
what you see in the mirror, don't blame me.
Beware these "conspiracies of trolls," I am serious. Who knows who might be paying them to be here and to say the things they say? All I know is
their strategy: "blame the victim of their own worst crimes," has revealed quite alot about them. They belong to a "cult" (probalby OTO) and are
"recruiting" new-members from this forum to "advertise" their idealogy. If they read those words, they will accuse me of being guilty of them, and
deny they are themselves. Then you will know who they are.